While solving a case study, a researcher encounters many predictors, possibilities, and interactions. That makes it intricate to select a model. With the help of different criteria for model selection, they can resolve those problems and estimate the precision.
The AIC and BIC are the two such criteria processes for evaluating a model. They consist of selective determinants for the aggregation of the considered variables. In 2002, Burnham and Anderson did a research study on both criteria.
Key Takeaways
- AIC and BIC are both measures used for model selection in statistical analysis.
- AIC stands for Akaike Information Criterion, and BIC stands for Bayesian Information Criterion.
- AIC penalizes model complexity less than BIC, which means that AIC may be preferred for smaller sample sizes, while BIC may be preferred for larger sample sizes.
AIC vs BIC
AIC measures the relative quality of a statistical model for a given set of data. It is based on the likelihood function and the number of parameters in the model. BIC is a similar model based on Bayesian principles on complexity measure but places a greater penalty on models with more parameters.
AIC results in complex traits, whereas BIC has more finite dimensions and consistent attributes. The former is better for negative findings and the latter for positive ones.
Comparison Table
| Parameters of Comparison | AIC | BIC |
|---|---|---|
| Full Forms | The full form of AIC is the Akaike Information Criteria. | The full form of BIC is the Bayesian Information Criteria. |
| Definition | An evaluation of a continual and corresponding interval among the undetermined, accurate, and justified probability of the facts is called Akaike Information Criteria or AIC. | Under a particular Bayesian structure, an accurate evaluation of the purpose of the possibility following the model is called Bayesian Information Criteria or BIC. |
| Formula | To calculate the Akaike information criterion, the formula is: AIC = 2k – 2ln(L^) | To calculate the Bayesian information criterion, the formula is: BIC = k ln(n) – 2ln(L^) |
| Selection Of Model | For false-negative outcomes, AIC is elected in the model. | For false-positive outcomes, BIC is elected in the model. |
| Dimension | The dimension of AIC is infinite and relatively high. | The dimension of BIC is finite and is lower than that of AIC. |
| Penalty Term | Penalty terms are smaller here. | Penalty terms are larger here. |
| Probability | To select the true model in AIC, the probability should be less than 1. | To select the true model in BIC, the probability should be exactly at 1. |
| Results | Here, results are more unpredictable and more complicated than BIC. | Here, results are consistent and easier than AIC. |
| Assumptions | With the help of assumptions, AIC can calculate the most optimal coverage. | With the help of assumptions, BIC can calculate less optimal coverage than that AIC. |
| Risks | Risk is minimized with AIC, as n is much larger than k2. | Risk is maximized with BIC, as n is finite. |
What is AIC?
The model was first announced by statistician ‘Hirotugu Akaike’ in 1971. And the first formal paper was published by Akaike in 1974 and received more than 14,000 citations.
Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) evaluates a continual in addition to the corresponding interval among the facts’ undetermined, accurate, and justified probability.
It is the integrated probability purpose of the model. So that a lower AIC means a model is estimated to be more similar to the accuracy. For false-negative conclusions, it is useful.
Reaching a true model requires a probability of less than 1. The dimension of AIC is infinite and relatively high in number, because of which it provides unpredictable and complicated results.
It serves the most optimal coverage of assumptions. Its penalty terms are smaller. Many researchers believe it benefits with the minimum risks while presuming. Because here, n is larger than k2.
The AIC calculation is done with the following formula:
- AIC = 2k – 2ln(L^)
What is BIC?
Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC) is an evaluation of the purpose of the possibility, following the model’s accuracy, under a particular Bayesian structure. So a lower BIC means that a model is acknowledged to be further anticipated as the precise model.
The theory was developed and published by Gideon E. Schwarz in 1978. Also, it is known as Schwarz Information Criterion, shortly SIC, SBIC, or SBC. To reach a true model, it requires a probability of exactly 1. For false-positive outcomes, it is helpful.
The penalty terms are substantial. Its dimension is finite that gives consistent and easy results. Scientists say that its optimal coverage is less than AIC for assumptions. That even sequences into maximum risk-taking. Because here, n is definable.
The BIC calculation is done with the following formula:
- BIC = k ln(n) – 2ln(L^)
The ‘Bridge Criterion’, BC, was developed by Jie Ding, Vahid Tarokh, and Yuhong Yang. The criterion was published on 20th June 2017 in IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. Its motive was to bridge the fundamental gap between AIC and BIC modules.
Main Differences Between AIC and BIC
- AIC is used in model selection for false-negative outcomes, whereas BIC is for false-positive.
- The former has an infinite and relatively high dimension. On the contrary, the latter has finite.
- The penalty term for the first is smaller. At the same time, the second one is substantial.
- Akaike information criteria have complicated and unpredictable results. Conversely, the Bayesian information criterion has easy results with consistency.
- AIC provides optimistic assumptions. At the same time, BIC coverages are less optimal assumptions.
- Risk is minimized in AIC and is maximum in BIC.
- The Akaike theory requires a probability of less than 1, and Bayesian needs exactly 1 to reach the true model.
- https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-03019-001
- https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0049124103262065
- https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0049124104268644
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783605002870
This article has been written by: Supriya Kandekar
Last Updated : 11 June, 2023
I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️
Emma Smith holds an MA degree in English from Irvine Valley College. She has been a Journalist since 2002, writing articles on the English language, Sports, and Law. Read more about me on her bio page.
The detailed explanations of AIC and BIC offered in the article significantly contribute to the overall comprehension of these model selection criteria.
The comprehensive overview of AIC and BIC outlined in the article enhances the understanding of these criteria in the context of statistical analysis.
The comparison between AIC and BIC was presented with great clarity, allowing for a better understanding of their respective roles in statistical modeling.
I couldn’t agree more. The risks associated with AIC and BIC were particularly thought-provoking.
The clear distinction between AIC and BIC makes it easier for researchers to make informed decisions in model selection.
This is a well-conducted study that provides clear insights into the crucial differences between AIC and BIC.
Yes, the in-depth analysis of AIC and BIC along with their respective calculations was very informative.
I completely agree. The comparison table was especially helpful in understanding the nuances of each criterion.
The article provides a comprehensive overview of AIC and BIC, making it easier to comprehend their significance in statistical analysis.
Absolutely, the key takeaways were presented concisely, and the comparison between AIC and BIC was enlightening.
I have some reservations about the accuracy of AIC and BIC, especially when it comes to their applicability in diverse research scenarios.
I understand your concern. It would be interesting to explore case studies where the limitations of AIC and BIC are evident.
There’s definitely room for further investigation into the practical implications of AIC and BIC in real-world research.
While the article presents a thorough examination of AIC and BIC, it would be beneficial to address potential limitations and challenges associated with their use.
I share your perspective. Exploring the practical implications of AIC and BIC in various research domains could provide valuable insights.
Agreed. An exploration of the potential drawbacks of AIC and BIC would contribute to a more balanced understanding of their utility.
The comparison table effectively demonstrated the distinctions between AIC and BIC, shedding light on the intricate aspects of statistical model selection.
Indeed, the practical implications of AIC and BIC were well-articulated, providing valuable insights for researchers.
The article’s detailed analysis of AIC and BIC serves as a valuable resource for researchers involved in model selection and analysis.