Cisco Tetration vs Stealthwatch: Difference and Comparison

With increasing workload and networking connections across multiple clouds, advanced security management is required to prevent threats and attacks.

Here, we’ll discuss two types of secure network analytics that promote visibility, detection, and protection while allowing you to use a zero-trust model. However, we will discuss their differences in this section.

Key Takeaways

  1. Cisco Tetration focuses on workload protection, visibility, segmentation, and compliance management.
  2. Stealthwatch is a network visibility and security analytics solution that detects real-time threats.
  3. Both products aim to enhance security but target different aspects of the cybersecurity landscape.

Cisco Tetration vs Stealthwatch

Cisco Tetration provides real-time visibility into application dependencies and system behaviour, allowing administrators to detect security incidents quickly. Cisco Stealthwatch uses flow-based technology to identify and analyze potential security threats, automate threat response, and provide forensic analysis.

Cisco Tetration vs Stealthwatch

Cisco tetration is a secure workload analytics solution that Cisco has introduced. Cisco tetration’s main purpose is to safeguard cloud workload and micro-segmentation across the network.

There are more threats today than ever due to a significant change in the networking platform set to begin in 2020.

Cisco titration protects your networking workload from approaching attacks, allowing for a secure workflow.

However, Stealthwatch is one of the best for network visibility and security intelligence monitoring. It detects attacks from a variety of sources using NetFlow and other related telemetry.

APTs, zero-day malware, DDoS, and insider threats are all included. It is well-known for its ability to detect threats in real time.

Comparison Table

Parameters of comparison Cisco TetrationStealthwatch 
Is micro-segmentation done with it?Yes No 
Is it used for network visibility?No Yes 
What is the method for detecting a threat?Policy stimulation and forensics of data center flowAnalyzing networks and figuring out how machines work
Purpose Intent-based capture Incident response 
What is its primary function?Segmentation of data (application and firewall).Visibility (networking and application).

What is Cisco Tetration?

Cisco tetration protects workloads through application segmentation, as well as process security and software vulnerability detection.

Also Read:  Spotify vs Wynk: Difference and Comparison

Cisco tetration’s main goal is to provide you with a secure and safe networking environment in multiple networking clouds by using micro-segmentation.

It accomplishes this by implementing a zero-trust security model across your network. Its application can be scaled up based on its workload and was designed to manage the automated workload as well.

Every workload networking can benefit from dynamic micro-segmentation. The specific data collected for each workflow is distributed via the operating system’s firewalls.

Cisco tetration ensures consistent micro-segmentation across multi-cloud networking, preventing lateral threats.

The virtualization of the process also ensures mobility without the need to rebuild or expand the micro-segmentation policy infrastructure.

Cisco tetration also aids in the reduction of attacks by analyzing data flow forensics and policy simulation. It even keeps track of software vulnerabilities.

It detects fraudulent escalations, shell-code execution, MITRE techniques, and other threats through workload management and communication monitoring.

It controls all software programs and the operating system in real-time. Overall, cisco tetration can be used to create a virtual network for a safe and secure workload.

Cisco tetration and stealth watch collaborate to improve your networking experience.

What is Stealthwatch?

Cisco introduced Stealthwatch, a solution that helps to detect networks and respond in real-time.

It relies on the initial infrastructure to alert and analyse threats and implements its security analyzing mechanism. It can be used to create both private and public networking clouds.

Stealth Wealth collects all network activities, keeps track of all data transfers and communication processes, and then analyzes tasks in real-time.

It quickly detects threats, whether ransomware, DDoS attacks, unauthentic crypto mining, malicious content, etc.

It accomplishes this through machine learning, instructional methods, and global threat intelligence (Cisco Talos).

Stealthwatch is also intended to initiate an incident response, so it issues special commands to expedite the process.

Stealthwatch’s comprehensive threat mechanism keeps an eye on the data centre, cloud, branch, endpoint, and so on. Additionally, it can detect lateral threats by keeping a record of all network telemetry.

Also Read:  GPRS vs WAP: Difference and Comparison

It even monitors threats in encrypted environments without decrypting the data, detecting threats, and keeping your network safe and secure at all times.

Stealthwatch does not require an agent, which makes it economical and allows for automated service. It also detects problems and can scale up to meet changing workloads.

Cisco tetration and stealth watches also help you improve network security and enable zero-trust infrastructure via network analytics.

Main Differences Between Cisco Tetration and Stealthwatch

  1. Cisco tetration integrates a security medium into the network, whereas a stealth watch keeps an eye on the initial infrastructure.
  2. Cisco Tetration uses micro segmentation, whereas visibility is ensured by stealth watch.
  3. Cisco tetration detects threats through policy stimulation and forensics of data centre flow, while stealth watch analyses networks and figures out how machines work.
  4. The goal of Cisco tetration is intent-based capture, whereas the goal of stealth watch is incident response.
  5. Cisco tetration’s primary function is data segmentation, whereas stealthwatch’s primary function is visibility.
Difference Between X and Y 2023 06 07T192541.961
References
  1. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=w1_dDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP38&dq=cisco+tetration+and+stealthwatch&ots=tNkncobQz5&sig=ZUAtblrqzQnGMwjnoB27h6zfDKE
  2. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=8ntJDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP30&dq=cisco+tetration+and+stealthwatch&ots=MaoNFDVrZw&sig=lS_rRO2fZkQkyqJyl6B-K3iKZUg

Last Updated : 13 July, 2023

dot 1
One request?

I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️

8 thoughts on “Cisco Tetration vs Stealthwatch: Difference and Comparison”

  1. The detailed descriptions of Cisco Tetration and Stealthwatch, along with their comparison, present an incredibly insightful analysis of the security solutions. A very informative read.

    Reply
  2. The article provides a clear understanding of the primary functions and security aspects of Cisco Tetration and Stealthwatch. The comparison is detailed and informative.

    Reply
  3. It’s intriguing to see how Cisco Tetration and Stealthwatch address different aspects of cybersecurity. This article offers valuable insights into their unique strengths and functions.

    Reply
  4. Dear author, I appreciate the comprehensive comparison. It’s interesting to note that both the Cisco Tetration and Stealthwatch have distinct functions.

    Reply
  5. The comparison table clearly explains which product offers what features. It appears that Cisco Tetration is more focused on workload protection and segmentation, while Stealthwatch is inclined towards network visibility and real-time threat detection.

    Reply
  6. This comparison of Cisco Tetration and Stealthwatch offers a comprehensive look at their respective roles in security management. The differences and functionalities are well explained.

    Reply
  7. I appreciate the thorough comparison of Cisco Tetration and Stealthwatch. The detailed insights into these security solutions are extremely helpful in understanding their roles in cybersecurity.

    Reply
  8. Both products seem to be highly effective in enhancing security, but their distinctive focuses cater to different cybersecurity needs. This is an enlightening comparison.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Want to save this article for later? Click the heart in the bottom right corner to save to your own articles box!