ISDN BRI vs PRI Interface: Difference and Comparison

Telecommunication has played a wider role in the development of this modern world. The invention of the radio paved the way for a gigantic field which made huge leaps and tremendous improvements in sending and receiving messages or data worldwide.

While it took days to communicate a message to a nearby city, it took only a fraction of a minute to send and receive messages to any part of the world. Broadband internet connection, VOIP, and DSL are presently used everywhere in telecommunication.

Before Internet and VOIP (Voice Over Internet Protocol), ISDN (Integrated Service Digital) was popular in telecommunication due to its simultaneous transmission of video, data and voice on a digital line over a telephone network. ISDN spearheaded the transformation of the analogue telephone network to digital lines.

The two main types of ISDN were BRI (Basic Rate Interface) and PRI (Primary Rate Interface). Though BRI and PRI belong to the same category, they differ in the service they provide to their users.

While BRI provided a low-cost service, PRI remained the main service due to its high performance and reliability.

Key Takeaways

  1. ISDN BRI (Basic Rate Interface) is a digital communication protocol that uses two B channels and one D channel for transmitting data and voice. In comparison, ISDN PRI (Primary Rate Interface) uses 23 B and one D channels.
  2. ISDN BRI suits small businesses and residential customers requiring basic voice and data communication services. At the same time, ISDN PRI is ideal for large businesses and organizations with high call volumes and data transmission needs.
  3. ISDN BRI provides lower bandwidth and limited data transmission rates, while ISDN PRI offers higher bandwidth and faster data transmission rates.

ISDN BRI vs PRI Interface

ISDN BRI (Basic Rate Interface) provides two 64 kbps bearer channels and one 16 kbps signalling channel. ISDN PRI (Primary Rate Interface) provides 23 or 30 64 kbps bearer channels and one 64 kbps signalling channel.

ISDN BRI vs PRI Interface

This data could give an overall idea of how fast the communication would be in PRI network as it transmits data at a rate of 1.536 Mbps (Megabytes per second) which is twenty-three times faster than BRI.

Also Read:  DNP vs NP: Difference and Comparison

Comparison Table

Parameters of ComparisonBasic Rate InterfacePrimary Rate Interface
DefinitionIt is one of the two types of ISDN interface, primarily for small-scale and home usage.It is a telecommunication interface intended for medium and large business firms.
Number of Bearer ChannelTwo bearer channels.Twenty-three bearer channels in T-carrier and thirty bearer channels in the E-carrier interface
Number of Data ChannelOne data channelOne data channel in both E-carrier and T-carrier.
Transmission SpeedA maximum speed of 128 kbps.The maximum transmission speed of 2.94 Mbps in dual PRI.
FeaturesLow-cost.Higher transmission speed with greater reliability.

What is BRI Interface?

The basic rate interface is the primary ISDN interface used in home and small-scale enterprises. It is the basic level of service in the ISDN network.

BRI interface helped receive or send data from multiple users at a time. It has two bearer (B) channel and one data (D) channel.

Among the two B channels, one B channel is used to transmit the signal and another B for receiving the signal. The bearer channel helps in carrying voice and data.

Data channel helps in carrying signal and control information.

The b channel transmits the signal in a circuit-switch network, whereas the D channel transmits data with the help of packets. BRI uses a pair of single twisted wires for data transmission.

A single B channel can transmit data at 64 kbps, So it is visible that BRI cannot transmit data not exceeding 128 kbps.

The data channel can transmit data at a rate of 16 kbps. Despite being able to transmit data at a slower speed when compared to PRI, it was popular among household and small-scale firms due to its low cost.

BRI did not gain popularity among large enterprises due to its low speed and reliability. To be precise, BRI acts as a level for basic service.

BRI was primarily meant for subscriber lines in telephone service.

bri interface 1

What is PRI Interface?

PRI stands for primary rate interface. PRI was the main interface preferred for high-speed internet access during its introduction in the market.

There are two types of BRI carriers. They are T- carrier and E-carrier.

The T-carrier configuration has twenty-three bearer channels and one data channel. T-carrier configuration is used in America and Japan.

Also Read:  Dam vs Reservoir: Difference and Comparison

While E-carrier boasts thirty bearer channels and one data channel, the e-carrier configuration is used in Australia and the European region.

The main reason for its high-speed network connectivity is because of the communication channel it possesses. As the number of bearer channel increases, the transmission speed also increases.

There are twenty-three bearer channels, meaning the transmission speed will be approximately 1.536 Mbps. This high speed was the reason behind large firms preferring PRI to BRI.  

Though PRI was efficient and reliable, people started searching for other alternatives due to the high cost. This resulted in the broadband network and voice-over-internet protocol (VOIP).

Slowly ISDN (PRI and BRI) network started losing its sheen due to high expenses compared to its competitors. Nevertheless, the ISDN network still transmits high-speed internet without broadband connectivity.

pri interface

Main Differences Between BRI and PRI Interface

  1. The primary rate interface is the preferred mode of communication for a high-speed network compared to the basic rate interface.
  2. A basic rate interface was adopted in the household due to its low cost in service.
  3. The primary rate interface has higher reliability and performance in transmitting data when compared to the basic rate interface.
  4. Large companies adopt The primary rate interface mainly, whereas small-scale companies prefer a basic rate interface system.
  5. The introduction of broadband harmed the primary and basic rate interfaces, in which the basic rate interface suffered a lot more than the primary rate interface.
  6. The only advantage of a basic rate interface over a primary rate interface is the cost difference not overlooked by people looking forward to high-speed network access.
Difference Between ISDN BRI and PRI Interface
References
  1. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-60794-3_9
  2. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6770427

Last Updated : 11 June, 2023

dot 1
One request?

I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️

25 thoughts on “ISDN BRI vs PRI Interface: Difference and Comparison”

  1. The distinction between BRI and PRI interfaces, along with their applications for different user requirements, gives a compelling insight into the evolution of telecommunication technologies. It’s an enriching read for those interested in this field.

    Reply
    • Absolutely, the article effectively presents the nuances of BRI and PRI interfaces, offering valuable knowledge for individuals seeking to understand the intricacies of modern telecommunication.

      Reply
  2. The evolution of telecommunication through the years has truly been impressive. From the invention of the radio to the implementation of ISDN BRI and PRI interfaces, the advancements have revolutionized the way we send and receive data globally.

    Reply
    • Absolutely, the impact of ISDN technology on communication cannot be overstated. It’s fascinating to see how these interfaces have transformed the landscape of telecommunication.

      Reply
  3. The technical specifications and applications of ISDN BRI and PRI interfaces have been meticulously explained, which greatly contributes to our comprehension of this complex field. It’s a commendable effort to elucidate such intricate technologies.

    Reply
    • Absolutely, the clear elucidation of BRI and PRI interfaces is a testament to the article’s valuable contribution to the discourse on telecommunication advancements. It’s a commendable presentation of complex technologies.

      Reply
  4. The detailed description and comparison of BRI and PRI interfaces provide a comprehensive understanding of the technological advancements in telecommunication. It’s an informative resource that enhances our knowledge in this domain.

    Reply
    • The comparison table effectively underscores the differences between BRI and PRI, making it easier to discern their unique attributes. It’s a valuable contribution to the discourse on telecommunication advancements.

      Reply
    • Indeed, the in-depth analysis fosters a clearer perspective on the complexities of ISDN BRI and PRI interfaces. This content significantly enriches our understanding of telecommunication technologies.

      Reply
  5. The data accurately presents the significant differences between BRI and PRI interfaces, shedding light on their unique features and capabilities. This in-depth analysis serves as a valuable resource for those interested in telecommunication.

    Reply
    • Absolutely, the detailed comparison table and explanations bring clarity to the distinctions between BRI and PRI. It’s a great reference for understanding the nuances of these interfaces.

      Reply
  6. The thorough explanation of BRI and PRI interfaces provides an insightful overview of their purposes and functionalities. It’s evident that the technological advancements have significantly impacted various scales of communication needs.

    Reply
    • The detailed descriptions and comparisons ensure that readers gain a comprehensive understanding of ISDN BRI and PRI interfaces. It’s a well-structured presentation of telecommunication advancements.

      Reply
    • Indeed, the comparison table effectively breaks down the key differences, making it easier to grasp the capabilities of BRI and PRI. The article’s clarity is commendable.

      Reply
  7. The focus on the technical details and functionalities of ISDN BRI and PRI interfaces gives a profound insight into the complexities of telecommunication technologies. This comprehensive elucidation reflects the author’s expertise in this domain.

    Reply
    • Indeed, the detailed exploration of BRI and PRI interfaces showcases the depth of knowledge in telecommunication technologies. It’s an educational resource for those interested in understanding this intricate field.

      Reply
  8. It’s fascinating to understand the technical differences between ISDN BRI and PRI interfaces. The transmission speeds and channel configurations highlight the diversity in meeting the needs of different users.

    Reply
    • Agreed, the comparisons between BRI and PRI paint a clear picture of how these interfaces cater to distinct user requirements. It’s an insightful analysis of their functionalities.

      Reply
    • The description of BRI and PRI interfaces provides a comprehensive understanding of their roles in telecommunication. The informative content greatly enhances our knowledge about these technologies.

      Reply
  9. The in-depth analysis of the BRI and PRI interfaces demonstrates the author’s ability to distill complex technical concepts into accessible insights. This enriches our understanding of telecommunication technologies in a profound manner.

    Reply
    • The thorough breakdown of the BRI and PRI interfaces provides a compelling overview of their functions and utilizations. The author’s clarity in explaining complex concepts greatly facilitates understanding.

      Reply
    • Absolutely, the comprehensive analysis of BRI and PRI interfaces is a testament to the author’s expertise in communicating intricate technical details. It’s an enlightening read for those seeking in-depth knowledge.

      Reply
  10. The transition from analogue telephone networks to digital lines, particularly through ISDN PRI, has led to significant improvements in data transmission rates. This has undoubtedly been pivotal for medium and large business firms.

    Reply
    • However, ISDN BRI was also a notable advancement for households and small-scale enterprises. Its ability to handle basic voice and data communication services at a low cost shouldn’t be overlooked.

      Reply
    • Indeed, the capabilities of ISDN PRI in providing high-speed internet access have been instrumental for businesses with demanding data transmission needs. It’s a commendable advancement in telecommunication.

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Want to save this article for later? Click the heart in the bottom right corner to save to your own articles box!