Metals and non-metals are two objects or things with opposite properties.
It is easy to distinguish between a metal and a non-metal, even by seeing or looking at certain objects.
I am sure you have seen copper, an example of metal, whereas non-metals are phosphorous, sulphur, and other elements.
One thing that we all have studied in our junior classes is that metals are good conductors of heat and electricity. In contrast, non-metals are bad conductors of heat and electricity.
This is true because you see that copper wires are used for transferring electricity and not other non-metallic elements.
Key Takeaways
- Metals are shiny, solid, and good conductors of heat and electricity, whereas non-metals are dull, brittle, and poor conductors.
- Metals lose electrons to form positively charged ions, while non-metals gain electrons to form negatively charged ions.
- Metals are denser and have higher melting and boiling points than non-metals, gases or low melting and boiling points.
Metals vs Non-Metals
Metals are solid, shiny, and good conductors of heat and electricity. They tend to be malleable and ductile and have a high melting point. Non-metals, on the other hand, are not shiny and are poor conductors. They tend to have lower melting and boiling points and may exist in various states of matter.
One can easily differentiate between metals and non-metals by their uses, too, because their properties make them have different kinds of usage for different purposes.
Comparison Table
Parameters of Comparison | Metals | Non-Metals |
---|---|---|
Conductors of Heat and Electricity | Metals are good conductors of heat and electricity. | Non-metals, on the other hand, are bad conductors of heat and electricity. |
Malleable | Metals are malleable, which means metals can be shaped or beaten into sheets. | Non-metals, on the other hand, are non-malleable. That is they cannot be beaten into sheets. |
Ductile | Metals are ductile because they can be made into wires for various uses. | Non-metals are not ductile. |
Strength | Metals have high strength. | Non-metals do not have much strength. |
Density | The density is high for metals. | In the case of non-metals, the density is low. |
Melting Point | Metals have a high melting point. | Non-metals have low melting points, unlike metals. |
What are Metals?
Metals are hard elements that are good conductors of heat and electricity.
Whenever we hear the word metal, we think of a hard substance, and yes, it is true because metals are hard substances, unlike non-metals which are not that hard or strong.
We had come across the term ‘metal’, especially in our chemistry class when we studied the Periodic Table.
These metallic elements have certain properties that make them different from non-metallic elements.
Some examples of metallic elements are aluminium and copper, which are both used in several industries today. Due to their various properties and uses, they are in great demand today.
Some properties of metals are that they are shiny and look polished with high density, unlike non-metals with low density.
Metals are ductile, too, meaning that metals can be transformed into wires by some processes and used as electrical wires.
Well, these all were the physical properties of metals. When you look at the chemical properties of metals, then they are easily corrodible and are good reducing agents.
Another interesting fact about metals is that when it is kept at room temperature, they are in their solid state, with the only exception of Mercury which is a liquid metal.
You see, metals make cooking utensils like pressure cookers and other kinds of stuff. Well, this is because they are good conductors of heat, which is why they are used for cooking.
Non-metallic kinds of stuff cannot be used for cooking because they are not good conductors of heat.
What are Non-Metals?
Non-metals, on the other hand, are just the opposite of metals, where they are bad conductors of heat and electricity. Non-metals like carbon, sulphur, hydrogen, and oxygen are less strong than metals.
Non-metals can be in the liquid state or their gaseous state.
Taking the example of oxygen, they are useful for the survival of human beings, but oxygen also supports burning. So, one way or the other, both non-metals and metals are useful for humankind.
When you see the Periodic Table, only a few non-metallic elements are in the chart, and many metals are present.
Talking about the physical properties of non-metals, they are opposed to that of metals because non-metals are not good conductors of heat or electricity.
They are also not ductile or malleable and cannot be used for several purposes.
The elements like hydrogen, oxygen, and carbon are some of the most useful elements that fall under non-metals.
Oxygen is useful for the survival of all living things and supports burning. Carbon, on the other hand, is useful for plants and trees.
Main Difference Between Metals and Non-Metals
- Metals are good conductors of heat and electricity, whereas non-metals are bad conductors of heat and electricity.
- Metals are ductile, meaning they can be made into wires for various uses, whereas non-metals are not.
- Metals are shiny, and they are much more polished than non-metals.
- Metals are electropositive, whereas non-metals are electronegative.
- Metals have a higher density as compared to non-metals.
This article effectively highlights the distinct properties of metals and non-metals, providing valuable insights for readers interested in the subject.
The article’s comparison table effectively summarizes the key disparities between metals and non-metals, creating a valuable reference for readers.
The use of scientific terminology and explanations adds to the credibility and educational value of the article.
The author’s articulate approach to elucidating the characteristics of metals and non-metals demonstrates a commendable level of expertise.
This article provides a thorough comparison between metals and non-metals, explaining their properties and uses. Very informative!
Absolutely! The article did a fantastic job of highlighting the key differences between metals and non-metals.
The author’s comprehensive overview of metals and non-metals encapsulates the essence of the subject matter, catering to the intellectual engagement of the audience.
The article’s analytical depth and lucid exposition of concepts contribute to an enlightening reading experience.
The article’s meticulous attention to detail and systematic comparison enhances the reader’s understanding of metals and non-metals.
The article provides a compelling analysis of the properties and uses of metals and non-metals, enabling readers to expand their knowledge on the subject.
I found the content to be intellectually enriching and informative, offering a well-rounded exploration of the topic.
The detailed explanation of the physical and chemical properties of both metals and non-metals enhances the reader’s knowledge on the topic.
Absolutely. The article’s emphasis on the practical applications of metals and non-metals enriches the reading experience.
The author’s insightful analysis of the uses and characteristics of metals and non-metals provides a compelling perspective.
The content is well-researched and backed by scientific facts, making it a reliable source of information.
Completely agree. The detailed explanation of the properties of metals and non-metals is commendable.
I appreciate the clarity and depth of information provided in the article. It’s a great read for those interested in chemistry.
The article offers a comprehensive comparison of metals and non-metals, catering to the intellectual curiosity of readers seeking in-depth knowledge on the subject.
I appreciate the article’s logical and coherent presentation of the differences between metals and non-metals.
The content is intellectually stimulating and accurately differentiates between the properties of metals and non-metals.
The article provides a clear understanding of the physical and chemical properties of metals and non-metals, making it a comprehensive guide for readers.
I found the explanation on the chemical properties of metals to be enlightening and well-articulated.
The comparison between the strength and density of metals and non-metals is depicted in a compelling manner. Great work!
I found the comparison table to be particularly useful in understanding the contrasting properties of metals and non-metals.
Agreed. The article effectively presents the properties of metals and non-metals in a structured and informative manner.
The article’s use of examples and practical applications of both metals and non-metals adds significant value to the content.