Should Be vs Must Be: Difference and Comparison

The words ‘should be’ and ‘must be’ are stated under modal auxiliaries according to the English language that should be used correctly since a difference between should be and must exists.

Both these words differ in their meaning and characteristics within their form too.

Key Takeaways

  1. Should be implied as a recommendation or suggestion, while it must imply a requirement or obligation.
  2. Should be is used to express the speaker’s opinion, while must be is used to state a rule or law.
  3. It should allow for flexibility and choice while having no room for deviation or negotiation.

Should Be vs Must Be

The term ‘should be’ can be used to suggest something. A person can also use this term to demonstrate his/her opinion. The term ‘must be’ can be used to indicate an action or activity that needs to be done. For example, you must complete your homework today. This shows that the homework needs to be done within the particular time period.

Should Be vs Must Be

‘Should be’ is said to be a modal auxiliary and is used to express the possibility that something could happen in the future. ‘Should be’ is stated as an undesirable goal.

Should be is used only as a verb, originating from the word ‘sceolde’, an old English term.

‘Must be’ is a modal auxiliary used to express and state a duty to be done or an unavoidable obligation. The word must be used in nearly three contexts with three meanings.

‘Must’ originated from an old English word called ‘Moste’.

Comparison Table

Parameters of comparisonShould BeMust Be
MeaningThis is used to state a person’s obligation or duty in a sentence. This also says what the best thing to do in a specific case in a sentence is.This word states a certainty or a compulsion of something to be done in the present or future in a sentence.
Degree of comparisonWhen this word is used in a sentence, the degree of comparison is relatively low.When this word is used in a sentence, the degree of comparison is the highest.
FunctionStated for giving advice or feedback.Stated that telling something is compulsory to happen.
DerivationIt was derived from the word “sceolde”.It was derived from the word “moste”.
NatureUsually used in informal communication.Usually used in formal or legal communication.

What is Should Be?

A person uses the word should be to state particular duties and obligations. A person also uses ‘should be’ when a thing has to be done in that specific situation only, especially when judging someone’s activities.

Should be’ is used as the past tense of shall be in the future tense. ‘Should be’ is used to state a piece of advice or a recommendation or talk about something said to be right or wrong within certain limits.

There are specific fundamental ways where the word should be is to be used in a sentence.

  1. To tell which is the best choice when something is happening.
  2. If there is a certain chance of something happening.
  3. To give specific or seek a bit of specific advice.
  4. To give and ask a particular reason for something happening.

Examples-

  1. She should be going to school today since it’s not a holiday.
  2. She should be sleeping early today because she has to wake up early tomorrow.
  3. They should probably drop her home since it’s too late.
  4. I hope I should be reaching on time for the office since the trains are late today.
should be

What is Must Be?

The word ‘must be’ was initially used to express an obligation to do something. This word is used to denote that something is compulsory and it has to happen for sure strongly.

The word must be used as a helping verb in a sentence. This word strongly emphasizes the need for a specific thing to happen in a sentence by stating it.

When a person says it, he means it is a compulsion for something to happen and cannot be unfulfilled.

There are specific essential ways where the word must be is to be used in a sentence.

  1. When a person wants to express a firm action.
  2. When a person states or expresses prohibition of something.
  3. When a person wants to give particular feedback or reviews regarding something
  4. Used in exclamatory sentences.
  5. When a person wants to emphasize strongly that a particular thing has to happen.

Example-

  1. This must be so amazing!
  2. You must be kidding.
  3. I must be going, for it is already late.
  4. This dish must be served with ice cream.
  5. The driver must park the car after dropping them off.
must 1

Main Differences Between Should Be and Must Be

  1. The word ‘should be’ denotes the possibility of something happening, whereas ‘must be’ represents certainty.
  2. The term ‘should be’ indicates that something can happen, whereas ‘must be’ suggests something has to occur.
  3. ‘Should be’ is certainly used to give a piece of advice. On the other hand, ‘must be’ denotes a compulsion for something.
  4. The word ‘should be’ is used in an informal conversation, whereas ‘must be’ is used in legal and formal ways.
  5. The degree of emphasizing is more minor in ‘should be,’ whereas the emphasis element is the highest in ‘must be.’
References
  1. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4176299
  2. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/0013189X033001027

Last Updated : 11 June, 2023

dot 1
One request?

I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️

25 thoughts on “Should Be vs Must Be: Difference and Comparison”

  1. The article offers an erudite analysis of ‘should be’ and ‘must be’, expanding readers’ grammatical acumen through its comprehensive exploration of linguistic intricacies.

    Reply
    • The article’s thorough examination of ‘should be’ and ‘must be’ underscores the significance of precise linguistic expression.

      Reply
    • Indeed, the scholarly exposition of ‘should be’ and ‘must be’ is instrumental in enhancing language proficiency and understanding.

      Reply
  2. The article elucidates the divergences between ‘should be’ and ‘must be’, shedding light on their varied usage and implications in different contexts.

    Reply
    • The scholarly approach to delineating ‘should be’ and ‘must be’ fosters deeper understanding and appreciation for linguistic intricacies.

      Reply
  3. The comparison table effectively illustrates the disparities between ‘should be’ and ‘must be’. It serves as a quick reference for distinguishing their usage.

    Reply
  4. The article meticulously scrutinizes ‘should be’ and ‘must be’, elucidating the subtleties of their usage through scholarly discourse and practical examples.

    Reply
  5. The article effectively distinguishes between ‘should be’ and ‘must be’, providing a clear understanding of their differences. The real-life examples help reinforce the concepts.

    Reply
  6. The article’s explanation of ‘should be’ and ‘must be’ is overly pedantic, focusing too much on technical aspects. It lacks practical examples of their application in everyday speech.

    Reply
    • I disagree, the technical details are crucial for a comprehensive grasp of the subject. Practical examples can be included without sacrificing depth.

      Reply
  7. The article skillfully presents the nuances between ‘should be’ and ‘must be’, benefiting English learners by offering comprehensive insights into their distinctions.

    Reply
    • Indeed, the detailed explanations cultivate a deeper understanding of the grammar, contributing to the improvement of language proficiency.

      Reply
  8. The article provides thorough explanation and examples for the usage of ‘should be’ and ‘must be’ in the English language. It is very informative and useful for those learning the language.

    Reply
    • I agree, this article clearly highlights the differences between ‘should be’ and ‘must be’, supporting it with a detailed comparison table.

      Reply
  9. The article’s insightful dissection of ‘should be’ and ‘must be’ underlines the necessity of understanding their divergent applications in English grammar.

    Reply
  10. The article’s meticulous comparison of ‘should be’ and ‘must be’ reflects the author’s expertise in grammar, providing a valuable resource for language learners.

    Reply
    • Absolutely, the article exhibits an in-depth analysis, catering to linguists who seek profound comprehension of language nuances.

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Want to save this article for later? Click the heart in the bottom right corner to save to your own articles box!