In the reciprocation to depth psychology, Behaviourism arose. This was the initial time of the twentieth century. However, explicitly the social cognitive theory took its establishment around the 1970s.
Within these two views, many concepts are identical, and their application and contributions to human understanding and societal betterment are equally essential.
Key Takeaways
- Social Cognitive Theory emphasizes the role of cognitive processes and social interactions in shaping behavior, while Behaviorism focuses on the relationship between environmental stimuli and observable behavior.
- Social Cognitive Theory emphasizes the importance of observational learning, self-efficacy, and goal setting, while Behaviorism focuses on the principles of reinforcement and punishment.
- Social Cognitive Theory takes a more holistic approach to behavior change, while Behaviorism focuses on specific behavior modifications.
Social Cognitive Theory vs Behaviorism
Social interactions among people that help in shaping their behaviour are called social cognitive theory. It mainly focuses on observational learning. Personal factors are also included in this learning approach. The approach to learning something through environmental factors is called behaviourism. Problems related to the mind, like stress or depression, can also be treated through this learning approach.
Social Cognitive Theory’s core concepts include observational learning, triadic reciprocal determination, and self-efficiency. Behaviourism is a psychological concept as well as a learning theory.
Behaviourism is based on framed experiments like ‘Little Albert,’ Pavlov’s dog experiments, and Skinner’s pigeon and rat experiments. Behaviourism is a psychological concept as well as a learning theory.
Comparison Table
| Parameters of Comparison | Social Cognitive Theory | Behaviourism |
|---|---|---|
| Proponent | Albert Bandura. | B.F. Skinner, Ivan Pavlov and John Watson. |
| Application | Children’s socialization and media modelling. | Treatment of illness related to mind, such as depression. |
| Framed experiments | Bobo Doll experiment of Albert Bandura. | ‘Little Albert’, dog experiments by Pavlov and pigeon and rats experiment by Skinner. |
| Nature | A learning theory. | A psychological approach and a learning theory. |
| Core concepts | Observational learning, triadic reciprocal determination and self-efficiency. | Classical conditioning, stimulus-response behaviour. |
| Learning | Learning is done via interaction between environmental, behavioural and personal factors. | Learning is done via environmental factors. |
What is Social Cognitive Theory?
Albert Bandura proposed this theory in his book called, “Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory”. This book was published in 1986.
Even though Bandura is a behaviourist, he takes a different approach to learning new habits than orthodox behaviourists. Observational learning, in his view, is how humans acquire new behaviours.
Furthermore, he used the term “self-efficiency.” It solely refers to one’s belief in one’s own potential to manufacture and act appropriately in any given situation.
What is Behaviorism?
Behaviourism is a psychological approach and a learning view that claims that behaviour is learnt by conditioning. In this process, the environment continuously influences a habit, either weakening or strengthening it.
Although behaviourism can be found in psychological writings dating back to the late 1800s, many theorists have contributed to this body of knowledge.
In terms of psychology, behaviourism rejects concepts like mental processes and unconscious motivations that aren’t visible instead of focusing on behaviour that can be monitored and controlled.
Main Differences Between Social Cognitive Theory and Behaviorism
- Observational learning, triadic reciprocal determination and self-efficiency are the core concepts provided by Social Cognitive Theory.
- In the case of Social Cognitive Theory, learning is done via interaction between environmental, behavioural and personal factors.
- https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1987-27834-001
- https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=sj_qg_fHP2oC&oi=fnd&pg=PA33&dq=Social+Cognitive+Theory+and+Behaviorism&ots=7XWwu_m13S&sig=06EGadi_c1zdXP0wcGY683VFAao
I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️
The article provides a thorough overview of the Social Cognitive Theory and Behaviourism. The comparison table is very useful to understand the differences.
I agree, the distinctions between the two concepts are well-explained.
The explanations of Social Cognitive Theory and Behaviorism, along with their historical contexts, provide a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter.
Indeed, the comprehensive overview makes the complex theories more accessible and understandable.
I agree, the article effectively presents the theories and their historical foundations.
The in-depth explanation of Albert Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory is thought-provoking and provides a comprehensive understanding of the subject.
The article effectively explains the approach taken by Albert Bandura in developing his Social Cognitive Theory, shedding light on the concept of ‘self-efficacy.’
I couldn’t agree more. Bandura’s approach enriches our comprehension of human behavior.
Absolutely, the concept of ‘self-efficacy’ is a significant contribution to the understanding of human behavior.
The detailed descriptions of the core concepts and learning approaches of Social Cognitive Theory and Behaviorism enable a deep understanding of their fundamental differences.
Absolutely, the article provides comprehensive insights into the two theories.
The comparison of the main differences between Social Cognitive Theory and Behaviorism outlines the unique aspects of each approach, facilitating a better understanding of their contributions to psychology.
I agree, the detailed comparison is very informative and aids in comprehending the concepts.
Absolutely, the article provides a clear distinction between the two theories, allowing readers to grasp the underlying principles effectively.
The details provided about the proponents, applications, and core concepts of both theories are enlightening.
I find the comparison table particularly helpful in understanding the fundamental differences between Social Cognitive Theory and Behaviorism.
I agree, the table is a useful summary of the key aspects of both theories.
The historical context and the specific examples of framed experiments provided make it easier to comprehend the theories.
Absolutely, the historical background enhances the understanding of these concepts.
The emphasis on observational learning, self-efficacy, and goal setting in Social Cognitive Theory offers valuable insights into human behavior.
Yes, the article effectively highlights the importance of these concepts.
I completely agree, it’s an interesting perspective.
The article effectively conveys the core principles, applications, and historical contexts of Social Cognitive Theory and Behaviorism, enhancing the reader’s comprehension of the subject.
Absolutely, the article is informative and contributes to a better understanding of these psychological concepts.
I completely agree, the article is enlightening and offers a holistic view of the theories.