Many people want to get a grip on their desktop 24/7, even if it means remote controlling it from a distance. Here are the two software that has catered to this little wish of the consumers. Many get confused about what choice to make between the two.
Don’t panic!! We will sort your inhibition out by giving you an X-ray explanation of both the software, which will put you at ease in choosing what and why. It is not news that most of us lead busy lives nowadays with tight schedules hanging around our necks most of the time.
In such a hectic lifestyle, forgetting plenty of tiny things is very common. One includes leaving your PC open with some important work or unclosed documents.
Teamviewer and Ultraviewer have stepped into the game to fix that tiny little thing you mess up while living a fast-paced life.
The clear-cut comparison will make it crystal for you to know if you need this and what will be the most suitable for you. So, without any further ado, let’s get started.
Key Takeaways
- TeamViewer and UltraViewer are remote desktop software allowing users to control and access remote computers from a distance.
- TeamViewer is a more feature-rich software with advanced features like file transfer, remote printing, and session recording. At the same time, UltraViewer is a simpler software with basic features like screen sharing and file transfer.
- TeamViewer is a paid software with different subscription plans, while UltraViewer is free software with no premium features.
Teamviewer vs Ultraviewer
TeamViewer and UltraViewer are remote desktop applications allowing users to access and control a computer from a different location. TeamViewer is more well-known and has more capabilities. With cheaper plans, UltraViewer is lighter and easier for basic remote access and support.
Comparison Table
| Parameters of Comparison | Teamviewer | Ultraviewer |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Teamviewer is slightly expensive than Ultraviewer. | Ultraviewer is affordable in comparison to Teamviewer. |
| Performance | Teamviewer wins here by a small margin, but still, it is better. | Ultraviewer’s performance is almost 3 quarters of Teamviewer, which accounts for about 75%. |
| Value for money | Both offer value-for-money services as Teamviewer provides the best at its high price point. Whereas, Ultraviewer provides slightly lower but justified service at their low price point. | |
| User base | Teamviewer has a much bigger customer base. | Ultraviewer’s base is significantly low. |
| Compatibility | Teamviewer comes both in Mac and Windows. | Ultraviewer has come only in Windows until now, which is not a plus point for the service creators. |
| Customer satisfaction | It would have been a tie, but Teamviewer won again by a slight margin. | Ultraviewer gives competition to the Teamviewer but loses by a few inches. |
| Interface | Much smoother. | You can experience a little bit of lag occasionally while using it. |
| Trust | It is no rocket science that Teamviewer’s decade and a half years in the business earns them more trust than its competitors. | Ultraviewer’s almost a newbie in the business. So, it will take time to win the trust of countless users in the market. |
| Features | Offers more. | Offers less. |
| Country of origin | Germany-based. | China-based. |
What is Teamviewer?
They save much of your time by offering remote control, desktop sharing file transfers, and web sharing. If you think about it, you can imagine how much time and money would’ve gone down the drain in the past.
It is owned by a company named Teamviewer AG which has expanded its operations across the globe in countries such as the USA and London.
Note: You’ve got to remember that technology and innovation can be both a boon and a curse. So, you need to be careful while using any of such applications as they can be equally detrimental as they are useful if somebody exploits their features.
They claim to offer top-notch security and encryption, including two-factor authentication. Their June 2019s press release backs their popularity claim as, according to it, they have completed installations on devices of more than 2 billion. That’s a humungous milestone.
What is Ultraviewer?
Since Ultraviewer is considerably young in this business, they have made it a point to capture the market by offering services at a very menial price point and also have a free version that is the most popular among the audiences.
They report a total of 40 million downloads on their website. They offer the same services, including remote control, file sharing, multi-window computer management, etc. They also offer multiple languages, which is a big plus.
It saves employee and traffic costs, making operations much more efficient. Ultraviewer is growing rapidly, gaining a loyal customer base day by day. They also updated free of cost, making it an attractive option for those who are tight on their budget.
Major Differences Between Teamviewer and Ultraviewer
- Teamviewer is a little better than Ultraviewer. After all, they’ve been long enough in the business to know both the trade and the tricks of the trade.
- Ultraviewer offers you the same service at a feasible price point for many. So, they lack a bit in the quality of the software they offer.
- Ultraviewer lags a bit more than Teamviewer. So, the interface is much better in the Teamviewer.
- People tend to choose a brand that has put some years into its survival. So, Teamviewer wins here too.
- However, Ultraviewer has secured a special place in the eyes of budget-friendly customers.
- https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6568559
- https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7578890/
Last Updated : 11 June, 2023
I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️
Sandeep Bhandari holds a Bachelor of Engineering in Computers from Thapar University (2006). He has 20 years of experience in the technology field. He has a keen interest in various technical fields, including database systems, computer networks, and programming. You can read more about him on his bio page.
The article seems to lack a critical analysis of potential security vulnerabilities in both TeamViewer and UltraViewer. Security should be a key consideration when discussing remote desktop software.
It’s an important point, the potential security risks associated with remote desktop software should not be overlooked.
I agree, a more in-depth look at the security aspects of these software would add value to the comparison.
The clear-cut comparison table makes it easy to weigh the different offerings of TeamViewer and UltraViewer. The article effectively summarizes the key differences.
The article provides a good balance between the technical features and the practical benefits of TeamViewer and UltraViewer. This helps readers understand the software’s value in real-world situations.
The practical implications of the features are well-represented, making it easier to grasp the usefulness of both software.
I agree, the article manages to present technical details in a way that’s relatable and understandable to a wider audience.
The article delivers a valuable explanation of the features, value, and user base differences between TeamViewer and UltraViewer. It’s an insightful breakdown for anyone considering these software options.
The article provides a comprehensive comparison of TeamViewer and UltraViewer, making it easier for readers to make an informed decision based on their needs and budget. A great read!
Thanks for the overview, it’s very informative and useful for anyone looking for remote desktop solutions.
I agree, the detailed comparison helps understand the pros and cons of each software. Well-written!
The overview of the origins and customer satisfaction data for TeamViewer and UltraViewer provides useful context to understand the background of both software. It adds depth to the comparison.
I agree, understanding the history and customer base of each software gives more insight into their market presence.
The article would be more balanced if it included information about the cons or limitations of both TeamViewer and UltraViewer. An analysis of potential drawbacks would round out the comparison.
Agreed, it’s important to consider not only the benefits but also the limitations of these software for a comprehensive evaluation.
The article seems to have a slight bias towards TeamViewer, as it consistently highlights its advantages over UltraViewer. A more neutral stance would enhance the credibility of the comparison.
I noticed that as well. It’s important for a comparison to maintain objectivity rather than leaning towards one option.
The comparison table is a great way to visually understand the differences between TeamViewer and UltraViewer. It’s very helpful for making a decision.
Agreed, the side-by-side comparison makes it easy to see which features are offered by each and how they differ.
The table makes it clear which software aligns with specific needs, a good approach to simplify the decision-making process.
The article could benefit from user testimonials or case studies to provide real-world examples of how these remote desktop solutions have been utilized in different scenarios.
I think incorporating real-world examples would add practical insights, making the article more engaging and relatable.