Toyota Dyna and Isuzu ELF run in the market with their features and facilities.
However, there are many similarities between Toyota Dyna and Isuzu ELF models and some of the parts for which they are famous among truckers.
The Toyota Dyna and the Isuzu ELF are two of the most formidable multi-purpose vehicles (MPV) in most countries. Toyota Dyna and Isuzu ELF are two medium-duty trucks with many things in common.
They’re both designed to transport people and cargo. Their physical dimensions are not all that different.
Key Takeaways
- The Toyota Dyna and Isuzu Elf are both light-duty commercial trucks.
- The Dyna has a more powerful engine than the Elf.
- The Elf has a larger payload capacity than the Dyna.
Toyota Dyna vs Isuzu ELF
The difference between Toyota Dyna and Isuzu ELF is that Toyota Dyna has less fuel consumption than Isuzu ELF. The Toyota Dyna gets roughly 22 miles per gallon of gas. On the other hand, the Isuzu Elf gets about 23 miles per gallon of gas.
The Toyota Dyna is a light to medium-duty cab over truck for commercial use. The Dyna series was introduced in 1959, primarily unchanged in design.
The line is popular with independent truckers and construction companies because of its ruggedness and ability to fit into places that large trucks cannot.
Isuzu ELF is a Japanese commercial vehicle and diesel engine company based in Tokyo that was formed in 1959. His creator has become well-known in many parts of the world.
The Isuzu Elf is noted for its low cost and high performance in the small truck sector.
Comparison Table
| Parameters of Comparison | Toyota Dyna | Isuzu ELF |
|---|---|---|
| Also called | Alternative in colours | Isuzu ELF is also called Chevrolet Tiltmaster, Chevrolet W-Series, Chevrolet Low Cab Forward, and Bedford KA50. |
| Fuel consumption | The Toyota Dyna’s fuel consumption is around 22 miles per gallon. | The Isuzu Elf fuel consumption is around 23 miles per gallon of gas. |
| White, blue, turquoise, and silver metallic are available for the Toyota Dyna. | White, green, silver and orange colors are available for the Isuzu Elf. | Toyota Dyna has a good fuel economy, using 23 litres per 100 kilometers. |
| Fuel economy | With a fuel efficiency of 22 litres per 100 kilometers, the Isuzu ELF is a solid choice. | With a fuel efficiency of 22 litres per 100 kilometres, the Isuzu ELF is a solid choice. |
| Type of engine | Toyota Dyna has an in-line 4-cylinder DOHC engine with a fantastic rail injection fuel system. | The 4HG1-T and 4HK1-TC four-cylinder engines in the Isuzu Elf make it a powerful car. |
What is Toyota Dyna?
The Toyota Dyna is a light-duty cab-over style truck produced by the Toyota division of Japanese automaker Toyota Motor Corporation. The Toyota Dyna is a light to medium-duty commercial cab-over truck.
The Dyna series debuted in 1959 with a design that has remained unchanged.
It was first introduced in 1959 and has evolved to include two different wheelbases because of its sturdiness and ability to fit into places where huge trucks cannot.
The line is popular with independent truckers and construction businesses.
The Toyota Dyna was first introduced in 1959 and became popular among truck buyers. The original Dyna was an all-new design, with only minor changes to the exterior throughout its run.
The Toyota Dyna is a medium-duty vehicle with a 2-door standard cab body style.
The Toyota Dyna was a true workhorse with the power to haul materials over the most challenging terrain. Some models were even fitted with snow ploughs for wintertime use.
The Dyna was marketed as a commercial truck and used in various commercial applications such as moving companies, construction, landscaping, and more.
The original Toyota Dyna RK52 was built between 1959 and 1961, with the revised model came known as RK60 – RK80 out in 1962 and produced until 1963.
The second generation came right after the first generation’s production and was offered between 1963–1968. It had a longer wheelbase than the first version that accommodated larger engines.
What is Isuzu ELF?
The Isuzu Elf is a medium truck-type vehicle produced by the Japanese automaker Isuzu Motors.
The Elf was first introduced in 1959, and truck enthusiasts may be familiar with the Isuzu Elf as one of the first production trucks with an automatic transmission.
Isuzu ELF is a Japanese commercial vehicle and diesel engine company headquartered in Tokyo, formed in 1959.
His creator has become well-known all across the world. The Isuzu Elf is noted for its affordability and reliability in the compact truck sector.
The transmission was operated by a single lever, making it easy and convenient for drivers to shift gears. The Isuzu Elf had a few different powertrain options over the years.
It was offered with gasoline and diesel engines, and versions equipped with gasoline engines could be fitted with turbochargers.
The Isuzu Elf, or Isuzu Hombre as it is known in some countries, is a medium truck-type vehicle manufactured by Isuzu in 1959. It is the first generation of the larger mid-sized trucks.
Main Differences Between Toyota Dyna and Isuzu ELF
- The Toyota Dyna gets a fuel efficiency of roughly 22 mpg, while the Isuzu Elf achieves a fuel efficiency of 23 mpg.
- The Toyota Dyna comes in various colours, including white, blue, turquoise, and silver metallic, while the Isuzu Elf is available in white, green, silver, and orange.
- The Toyota Dyna is a great vehicle to drive, with a fuel efficiency of 23 litres per 100 kilometres. The Isuzu ELF, on the other hand, is an efficient car with a fuel economy of 22 liters per 100 kilometres.
- The Toyota Dyna is powered by an in-line 4-cylinder DOHC engine with a superior fuel rail injection system, while Isuzu Elf’s has a four-cylinder with 4HG1-T and 4HK1-TC engines that are powerful.
- The Toyota Dyna is also known as the Daihatsu Delta, Hino Dutro, and Toyota ToyoAce. The Isuzu ELF is known as the Chevrolet Tiltmaster Chevrolet W-Series, Chevrolet Low Cab Forward, and Bedford KA50.
Last Updated : 13 July, 2023
I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️
Piyush Yadav has spent the past 25 years working as a physicist in the local community. He is a physicist passionate about making science more accessible to our readers. He holds a BSc in Natural Sciences and Post Graduate Diploma in Environmental Science. You can read more about him on his bio page.
The Toyota Dyna and Isuzu ELF are undeniably impressive multi-purpose vehicles. However, I expected a more in-depth discussion about their technological features and safety aspects.
It’s true that the article could have delved deeper into the technological and safety features, but the overall information provided is beneficial for making informed decisions.
I respectfully disagree, Thomas. The article offers a comprehensive overview that highlights the main differences and key characteristics without overwhelming the readers with excessive technical details.
The Toyota Dyna and Isuzu ELF comparison is well-presented and insightful. As a truck enthusiast, I appreciate the clear and concise breakdown of their differences and similarities.
The article provides a balanced comparison without favoring one model over the other. The comprehensive analysis allows readers to make informed choices based on their specific needs.
Great article! Very informative and interesting. I appreciate the detailed comparisons between the Toyota Dyna and Isuzu ELF. It makes it easier to decide which one would be a better fit depending on individual needs and preferences.
You’re absolutely right, Rose! The article provides a thorough analysis that’s extremely helpful for potential buyers.
The article is quite informative, but the repetitive nature of certain parts, such as the detailed comparison table, makes it somewhat tedious to read. A more streamlined approach would have enhanced the overall readability.
I see your point, Bbutler. While the comparison table is beneficial, a more concise representation may have improved the readability of the article.
The article fails to emphasize the differences in engine performance and payload capacity. There should have been more extensive coverage on those aspects.
I disagree, Orose. The article adequately addresses these differences in the comparison table and the description of both vehicles.
I found the information to be very useful and easy to comprehend. The comparison table is especially helpful for those who are interested in the nitty-gritty details of both models.