Vivo vs Vitro: Difference and Comparison

Many types of industry are found in the modern economy. Economics is a very complex term to elaborate on. There are countless organizations, companies, institutions, etc. Some have the potential to power the economy effectively.

Vivo and Vitro are two major companies. They produce essential products useful in our daily life.

Key Takeaways

  1. In vivo experiments involve living organisms, while in vitro experiments are conducted in a controlled laboratory environment.
  2. In vivo studies are more complex and provide a more comprehensive understanding of biological processes.
  3. In vitro studies are less expensive, easier to control, and allow for quicker results than in vivo studies.

Vivo vs Vitro

Vivo experiments are those that are conducted within a living organism, such as a human, animal, or plant. Vitro experiments are conducted outside of a living organism, in a laboratory setting. These experiments involve using cells, tissues, or organs that have been removed from the organism.

Vivo vs Vitro

Vivo is a major company in the field of communication technology. It belongs to China, and its headquarters is in Chinese reign, Dongguan. It develops smartphones and smartphone accessories and uses V-Appstore to distribute its services.

No country would have been untouched by the influence of Vivo.

Vitro is a major company in the field of the glass industry. It belongs to Mexico, and its headquarters is in Mexican reign San Paulo Garza Garcia. It develops glass, chemicals, automotive glass, etc. It provides its services in many countries as well.

It is quite older than Vivo. Vitro has completed a century in the industry.

Comparison Table

Parameters Of ComparisonVivoVitro
FounderVivo was founded by Shen Wei twelve years ago in 2009.Vitro was founded by Roberto G. Sada Garcia in 1909.
IndustryThe industry Vivo serves is communication technology.The industry Vitro serves is the Glass industry.
Area servedWorldwide.Worldwide.
HeadquarterThe headquarter of Vivo is in Dongguan, China.The headquarter of Vitro is in San Paulo Garza Garcia, Mexico.
Number of employeesVivo has around 10,000 employees.Vitro has almost 15,000 employees.

What is Vivo?

The full name of Vivo is Vivo Communication Technology Co. Ltd. It is a Chinese technology company. Vivo develops and designs smartphones, smartphone accessories, software, HiFi, and other online services.

Also Read:  Sale vs Discount: Difference and Comparison

It has its app store known as V-Appstore. This helps Vivo to distribute its software and online services across many countries. Vivo is an independent company and is known to develop and make its products. The headquarters of Vivo is in Dongguan.

It has multiple research centres in many cities like Shenzhen, Nanjing, Guangdong, etc. Vivo is a dominant company in the industry of consumer electronics. Shen Wei founded Vivo Communication Technology Co. Ltd twelve years ago, in 2009.

The area served by Vivo is worldwide. Key people of Vivo are Shen Wei, the company’s CEO, and Jerome Chen, the CMO & VP of Vivo India. Vivo launched a brand in 2019 known as iQOO. The parent company of Vivo is BBK Electronics.

It is a subsidiary of BBK Electronics. Vivo has accomplished a significant position in the communication industry. In 2015, Vivo ranked among the top 10 smartphone-making companies. The major factor of this ranking was 2.7% global market share.

Vivo has over two hundred million users around the world.

Notable innovations by Vivo are adding fingerprint readers right beneath the screen; it has removed the bottom bezel to make more room for the screen and also added an audio chip of HiFi quality and a 2k thinnest screen.


What is Vitro?

Vitro is the largest company in Mexico that produces glass. It is also the largest organization in the glass industry. Vitro was founded in Monterey in 1909 in Mexico. It has been very innovative in the field of the glass industry.

This organization is so large that it has 30 subsidiaries in Panama, Costa Rica, Mexico, Colombia, Bolivia, the United States, and Brazil. The headquarters of Vitro is in San Paulo Garza Garcia, Mexico. The founder of Vitro is Roberto G. Sada Garcia.

Also Read:  Sole Proprietorship vs Partnership: Difference and Comparison

There are multiple other branches of this company. Some of these are LLC, Vitro Architectural Glass, S.A. De C.V., Vitro Packaging, etc. Key people of Vitro are Adrian G. Sada González, who is chairman of the company and Adrian G. Sada Cueva, who is CEO of the company.

With the passing of time, Vitro has expanded its area of production where it does not only produce glass but also some other products, that are chemicals, Glass containers, Automotive Glass, Float Glass, etc. Vitro provides glass articles to 34 countries in Asia, Europe, and America.

Vitro is now focused on producing flat glass. The number of employees in Vitro is 15,035. The capital stock that Vitro controls in the companies held by it, directly or indirectly, is more than 50%.

In some companies, Vitro has joint control; to execute this control, Vitro uses the proportionate consolidation method.

Main Differences Between Vivo and Vitro

  1. Vivo is an Asian company located in the region of China, while In vitro is an American company located in the region of Mexico.
  2. The industry served by Vivo is telecommunication. On the other hand, vitro has served the glass industry for a long time.
  3. Many countries served by Vivo are in Asia, while Vivo serves evenly in four continents.
  4. The products provided by Vivo are related to electronic technology, while Vitro makes different kinds of glasses.
  5. Vivo has completed only a decade in the industry, while Vitro has been around for an entire century.

Last Updated : 13 July, 2023

dot 1
One request?

I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️

6 thoughts on “Vivo vs Vitro: Difference and Comparison”

  1. I appreciate the comprehensive insight into Vivo and Vitro provided by this article. It was very enlightening to learn about the distinctions between these two major companies. It’s educational and well written.

  2. The article has provided very interesting information about how vivo and vitro differ from each other in terms of history, products, and industry. I loved how the article used simple language to make complex concepts easier to understand.

  3. The descriptions of Vivo and Vitro are on point, and the comparison is well detailed. It was a bit challenging for me to read and comprehend the differences due to the high intellectual language used. It would have been better if it was more reader-friendly.

  4. I found the information very useful. But the complex nature of the details provided made it a bit hard for me to comprehend the difference between Vivo and Vitro. A more simplified version would have been better.

  5. The details provided about Vivo and Vitro was very well explained. The informative nature of the article was very helpful for me to understand the differences between Vivo and Vitro.

  6. The article was very well detailed but the comparison between Vivo and Vitro was a bit lacking. More emphasis on comparing the features and products of both companies would have made it more effective.


Leave a Comment

Want to save this article for later? Click the heart in the bottom right corner to save to your own articles box!