Written vs Oral Communication: Difference and Comparison

Communication is the most important life skill. Efficient communication skills can help one reach heights in almost every aspect of life.

From personal relationships to formal meetings, communication acts as a significant part. Humans have depended on communicating with each other for any purpose or without any purpose.

Written and oral communications are two types of communication forms.

Key Takeaways

  1. Written communication involves using written symbols to convey information and ideas, which can be saved and shared easily. In contrast, oral communication involves spoken words and gestures to convey information and ideas, which are ephemeral and require immediate attention.
  2. Written communication allows for careful crafting and editing of messages, which can ensure clarity and accuracy. In contrast, oral communication allows for immediate feedback and clarification, enhancing understanding and connection between people.
  3. Written communication is more formal and requires higher literacy levels, while oral communication is more informal and requires higher levels of speaking and listening skills to be effective.

Written Communication vs Oral Communication

Oral communication is mode of passing on a message. Oral communication involves conveying a message to an individual through spoken words. The formal method of transmitting information to someone in a written format is called written communication. The message can be exchanged in text from.

Written Communication vs Oral Communication

Written communication is used for legal purposes. The written message must have correct grammar, spelling, structure, and form. Other than that, the text messages we share with our friends are more on the informal side of the continuum. The rigidity is a bit more flexible in informal settings.

In our everyday conversations, oral communication is used. Oral speeches are flexible and are allowed to have fillers, incorrect grammar, and a lack of structure. In formal settings, oral speeches can be very well structured and expressed, but still, there is a scope for fillers and instant modifications.

Comparison Table

Parameters of ComparisonWritten CommunicationOral Communication
Mode of communicationWritten wordsSpoken words
StructureWell-structures, minimal mistakesLoosely structured, allowed to make a few errors.
Permanence It can be preserved as proof.There is no record.
Access to the informationAnyone can have the write-up.The speaker can choose the audience.
Feedback from the recipient DelayedInstant

What is Written Communication?

As the name suggests, written communication is a written form of communication. Written words are used while communicating with people.

Also Read:  Ego vs Self Respect: Difference and Comparison

Messages, emails, letters, and contracts are examples of written communication.

While communicating formally in written form, the language is kept concise and legitimate.

The written message or document can be used as proof. Also, it cannot be tampered with if the document is encrypted properly.

Generally, written communication aims to communicate information to the audience. In formal scenarios, written communication helps efficiently deliver one individual’s ideas to the other.

A written text is more permanent, so it can be traced back as per requirements. For instance, a reader can look at this article again anytime, per their requirement.

Hence, the terms of a contract are communicated in written form so that it can be reread to interpret it.

However, there is a lack of secrecy in written communication. The person on the receiving end may circulate the written message to anyone.  

Moreover, there is limited scope for instant feedback. The intended recipient may reply or give their feedback in due course of time.

Also, the written text must be understandable and well-structured to deliver the idea clearly to the recipient.

written communication

What is Oral Communication?

Oral communication implies that spoken words are used while communicating. It is widely used when communicating with friends, relatives, employees, and partners.

It also includes speeches, presentations, lectures, and discussions.

Oral communications are more flexible. They are modified according to the listener’s level of comprehension.

For instance, a PhD holder delivers speeches in an undergraduate college, according to the audience’s level.

Oral communication is especially efficient in resolving issues. There is scope for the recipient to give their feedback, advice, or concerns immediately. Decisions can be made instantly due to immediate replies from the other end.

Further, there is minimal scope for misunderstandings in oral communication. The speaker can choose their audience; hence, the information is safe. However, gossips are also a form of oral communication.

Also Read:  UTC vs PDT: Difference and Comparison

Gossip can be easily spread because there is no record of the communication.

Oral communications are less organized and may lack essential information. Besides that, the speaker can stray from the intended topic, which may waste time and energy.

The informal nature of oral communication can help in building interpersonal relationships. But it is not recommended to keep records of business meetings and contracts.

Oral communications have comparatively less value in courts, so keeping a written record of formal matters is recommended.

oral communication

Main Differences Between Written Communication and Oral Communication

  1. Written communication is based on written words, whereas oral communication functions on spoken words.
  2. Written communication is densely packed with information, but oral communication allows gaps and fillers to make the conversation lighter.  
  3. The written communication can be saved for the future as proof or memory. On the other hand, there is no record of oral communication unless it is specifically recorded. 
  4. The recipient can share written communication with anyone without the sender’s knowledge. But, while communicating orally, the speaker can choose his/her audience.
  5. Written communication has little to no space for changing the final message. But, in oral communication, the speaker can modify his/her message even at the last moment.
Difference Between Written Communication and Oral Communication
References
  1. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=hVBcAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=what+is+written+communication&ots=FaQoJX33ht&sig=NzXPggrYhoGJ57l5RwtAYZJEAwU
  2. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00390.x
  3. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED296333
  4. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/141f/9dfc25d4a9c3ee41119155253dff6fbc1e7f.pdf

Last Updated : 11 June, 2023

dot 1
One request?

I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️

24 thoughts on “Written vs Oral Communication: Difference and Comparison”

  1. The article provides an insightful comparison between written and oral communication. It also effectively highlights the importance of communication in different aspects of life.

    Reply
    • Absolutely, the article presents a thorough analysis of the two forms of communication, shedding light on their respective advantages and limitations.

      Reply
  2. The article effectively highlights the distinctive features of written and oral communication, providing readers with a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter.

    Reply
    • I agree! It’s evident that the article meticulously details the characteristics and differences of written and oral communication, giving readers a well-rounded perspective.

      Reply
  3. This article provides valuable insights into the nuanced differences and applications of written and oral communication. The comparisons are well-illustrated and informative.

    Reply
    • Indeed, the article effectively captures the essence of both types of communication. Each form’s characteristics are well-explained and analyzed.

      Reply
  4. The insightful comparisons and detailed breakdown in this article offer readers a thorough understanding of the distinct characteristics of written and oral communication.

    Reply
    • Absolutely, the enriching analysis of written and oral communication in this article provides readers with valuable insights into the nuances of each form.

      Reply
  5. The in-depth comparison between written and oral communication is enlightening. It effectively addresses the importance, nuances, and distinct nature of each form.

    Reply
    • I totally agree! The article presents a comprehensive breakdown of the features and uses of written and oral communication, allowing readers to thoroughly understand the topic.

      Reply
    • Absolutely, the detailed comparison in this article is indeed thought-provoking. It provides a comprehensive understanding of the intricacies of both communication methods.

      Reply
  6. The article insightfully delves into the differences between oral and written communication, providing an analytical breakdown of their key characteristics and applications.

    Reply
  7. The writer meticulously explains the characteristics of both written and oral communication, making it easier to understand their key differences and uses. Well done!

    Reply
    • I couldn’t agree more! The article does an excellent job in outlining the complexities of both communication forms.

      Reply
    • Absolutely, the clarity of explanation in this article is commendable. It truly enhances the reader’s understanding of the subject.

      Reply
  8. The article offers a thorough analysis of written and oral communication, elucidating their unique attributes and roles in various contexts.

    Reply
    • Absolutely, the article brilliantly dissects the features of written and oral communication, allowing readers to gain profound insights into their significance.

      Reply
  9. The writer’s comprehensive breakdown of written and oral communication is truly impressive, offering an enriching learning experience for readers.

    Reply
    • I couldn’t agree more! The article’s detailed comparisons of written and oral communication are exceptionally informative and thought-provoking.

      Reply
    • Absolutely, the article effectively encapsulates the essence of written and oral communication, providing valuable insights for analytical comparison.

      Reply
  10. The article meticulously examines the imperative aspects of written and oral communication, enriching the readers’ understanding of their individual roles and features.

    Reply
    • Indeed, the analysis of written and oral communication in this article is truly illuminating, it offers a profound understanding of their respective nuances.

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Want to save this article for later? Click the heart in the bottom right corner to save to your own articles box!