控訴と改訂: 相違点と比較

An appeal is a request for a higher court to review a lower court’s decision based on legal errors, while a revision is a process in which a court reexamines its own decision to correct any mistakes or inaccuracies. Appeals typically involve a higher court, while revisions are handled within the same court that made the initial decision.

主要な取り組み

  1. 控訴は、上級裁判所が下級裁判所の判決を検討して、裁判または法的手続き中に誤りがあったかどうかを判断する法的手続きです。 修正とは、間違いを修正したり新しい証拠に対処したりするために、判決を下したのと同じ裁判所による事件の再審理です。
  2. 控訴には、事件をより高い当局に移すことが含まれますが、修正は、最初に事件を審理したのと同じ裁判所内で行われます。
  3. 控訴と修正の両方が、法的決定を見直し、場合によっては変更するのに役立ちます。 それでも、控訴は上級裁判所の判決に依存しているのに対し、修正は元の裁判所による事件の再審査に焦点を当てています。

上訴と修正

上訴とは、当事者が裁判所の決定に異議を申し立てることができる法的手続きであり、上級裁判所に決定を再検討し、それが正しく行われたかどうかを判断するよう依頼します。 改訂とは、当事者が新しい証拠に基づいて自らの決定を再検討するよう裁判所に要求できるようにする法的手続きです。

上訴と修正

控訴は、 苦情 下級裁判所の判決を不服として、上級裁判所に提訴。 対照的に、修正は、下級裁判所による欠陥または管轄権の不行使を排除するための再審査の行為です。

控訴は、上級裁判所による下級裁判所の決定の信頼性を確認するために行われる民事訴訟法の不服申し立てです。 請求は、上訴で可決された元の法令または布告に対して提出することができます。

改訂とは、高等裁判所が、下級裁判所で下された結論を書き直して書き直す権限です。 検察を精査し、判決を改善・是正するという意味だ。


 

比較表

特徴アピールリビジョン
開始者Losing party in the lower court decisionAny party 事件に関わった
Court level高等裁判所 than the one that issued the original decisionSame court that issued the original decision
行動の根拠Error of law (legal mistake), error of fact (factual mistake), or procedural error (improper application of legal procedures)Limited grounds, specific to the discovery of new and important evidence not previously presented, or material irregularities in the original proceedings
Scope of reviewBroader: The higher court re-examines the entire case and may reach a different conclusion on the merits.Narrower: The court focuses on the specific grounds for revision and may only modify the original decision without completely overturning it.
Effect on original decisionStays the execution of the original decision while the appeal is pending.Does not stay the execution of the original decision.
Likelihood of success一般に低い due to the broader scope of review and stricter standards for overturning a lower court decision.潜在的に高い due to the specific and limited grounds for revision.
費用一般的に高価 due to the more complex procedures and potential involvement of lawyers at a higher court level.May be less expensive depending on the complexity of the case and the specific grounds for revision.

 

アピールとは?

Appeal: Overview

An appeal is a legal process through which a party seeks to challenge a decision made by a lower court or tribunal by taking the case to a higher court. It provides an opportunity for parties dissatisfied with a lower court’s judgment to present their arguments before a higher judicial authority.

Grounds for Appeal

Appeals are typically based on legal errors or irregularities in the lower court’s proceedings rather than on the merits of the case itself. Common grounds for appeal include:

  1. Errors of Law: This occurs when the lower court incorrectly applied or interpreted the law relevant to the case. It may involve misinterpretation of statutes, precedents, or procedural rules.
  2. Procedural Irregularities: Appeals can be filed if there were significant procedural errors during the trial, such as bias or misconduct by the judge or jury, improper admission or exclusion of evidence, or denial of due process rights.
  3. Errors of Fact: While appellate courts generally defer to the lower court’s findings of fact, appeals may be allowed if there is evidence that the lower court’s factual determinations were clearly erroneous or not supported by the evidence presented.

Process of Appeal

The process of appeal typically involves the following steps:

  1. Filing Notice of Appeal: The appellant (the party seeking the appeal) files a notice of appeal with the appropriate appellate court within a specified time frame after the lower court’s judgment is issued.
  2. Appellate Briefs and Oral Arguments: Both parties submit written briefs outlining their legal arguments and supporting evidence. In some cases, oral arguments may be scheduled where each party presents their case before the appellate judges.
  3. Appellate Decision: After reviewing the arguments and evidence presented by both parties, the appellate court issues a written decision either affirming, reversing, or modifying the lower court’s judgment. In some instances, the appellate court may remand the case back to the lower court for further proceedings.
アピール
 

リビジョンとは

Revision: Overview

Revision is a legal process wherein a court reexamines its own decision to correct any mistakes, inaccuracies, or oversights that may have occurred during the initial judgment. It allows for the review and potential amendment of the court’s decision to ensure fairness and accuracy.

Grounds for Revision

Revisions are typically sought on specific grounds, which may include:

  1. 新しい証拠: If new evidence emerges that was not available or known at the time of the original decision and is deemed significant to the case, a revision may be granted to consider this evidence.
  2. Error in Judgment: If there is evidence of a procedural error, legal mistake, or oversight in the court’s decision-making process, parties may request a revision to rectify these errors.
  3. 状況の変化: In cases where circumstances relevant to the case have changed significantly since the original judgment, such as changes in law or factual circumstances, a revision may be warranted to reflect these changes.

Process of Revision

The process of revision typically involves the following steps:

  1. Filing a Motion for Revision: A party files a motion with the same court that issued the original decision, outlining the grounds for revision and presenting any supporting evidence or arguments.
  2. Review by the Court: The court reviews the motion for revision, along with any accompanying evidence or arguments, to determine whether there are sufficient grounds to warrant a reexamination of the case.
  3. Decision on Revision: After considering the motion and any responses from the opposing party, the court decides whether to grant or deny the revision. If granted, the court may hold further hearings or proceedings to review the case and potentially amend its original decision accordingly.
  4. Issuance of Revised Decision: If the court decides to revise its original judgment, it will issue a revised decision reflecting any changes or corrections deemed necessary based on the grounds presented for revision.
リビジョン

審判と修正の主な違い

  1. 自然:
    • An appeal involves taking a case to a higher court for review of a lower court’s decision.
    • Revision is a process where the same court that issued the original decision reexamines it.
  2. 目的:
    • Appeals are typically based on legal errors or irregularities in the lower court’s proceedings.
    • Revision aims to correct mistakes, inaccuracies, or oversights in the court’s own decision.
  3. 根拠:
    • Appeals are generally based on errors of law, procedural irregularities, or errors of fact.
    • Revision may be sought based on new evidence, error in judgment, or changed circumstances.
  4. 権限:
    • Appeals are reviewed by a higher court, which has the authority to affirm, reverse, or modify the lower court’s decision.
    • Revision is conducted by the same court that issued the original decision, which has the authority to amend its own judgment.
  5. プロセス:
    • The process of appeal involves filing a notice of appeal, submitting appellate briefs, oral arguments, and awaiting a decision from the appellate court.
    • Revision requires filing a motion for revision with the same court, followed by a review of the motion, potential hearings, and issuance of a revised decision if the revision is granted.
XとYの違い 2023 04 05T155641.163
参考文献
  1. https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/washlr44&section=26
  2. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40237094
  3. https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/article-abstract/50/1/201/2571661
  4. https://brill.com/view/book/9789004251038/B9789004251038-s033.xml

最終更新日 : 07 年 2024 月 XNUMX 日

ドット1
XNUMXつのリクエスト?

私はあなたに価値を提供するために、このブログ記事を書くことに多大な努力を払ってきました. ソーシャルメディアや友人/家族と共有することを検討していただければ、私にとって非常に役立ちます. 共有は♥️

「控訴と改訂: 相違点と比較」についての 23 件のフィードバック

    • あなたの言いたいことは理解できますが、それでも上訴と改訂を理解するのに役立つリソースです。

      返信
    • おそらく、さらに深く掘り下げることもできますが、これらの用語に馴染みのない人にとっては、良い出発点となります。

      返信
    • 私はあなたに同意しないと思いますが、この投稿は非常に理にかなっていて、上訴と改訂の明確な区別を示しています。

      返信
    • はい、異議申し立てと改訂の違いをより明確に理解することは素晴らしいことです。

      返信

コメント

後で読むためにこの記事を保存しますか? 右下のハートをクリックして自分の記事ボックスに保存!