In the world of camcorders and handy cams, canon has always been in the top two competitors since 2001. The Canon HF10 and HF100 are Memory Chips rangefinder cameras that use the AVCHD codec format.
They both come with most of the typical videotape capabilities, as well as Canon-only features like the 3.3 Pixel resolution, DIGIC DV II Image Processor, MegaRanged super optical IS (image stabilization), and Fast AF (Auto Focus).
Key Takeaways
- Canon HF10 features 16GB internal memory, while Canon HF100 relies solely on SDHC cards for storage.
- Both camcorders offer Full HD recording, optical image stabilization, and 12x optical zoom.
- The Canon HF10 and HF100 share similar designs and features, with the primary difference being the storage options available.
Canon HF10 vs Canon HF100
The difference between Canon HF10 and HF100 is that Canon’s HF10 camera includes two micro sd cards. It has two memory options: the camcorder’s inbuilt 16 GB Flash Memory and an SDHC sd card, whilst the HF100 only has an 8 GB SDHC card. The physical features are quite similar, the playing controls underneath the Flipout screen are fantastic, but we have been underwhelmed with the edge video/menu slider, which makes it difficult for your thumb to switch modes on the go.
The HF10, on either contrary, can capture for up to 6 hours and mins in LP (long-play) style and 4 hours and mins in SP form, thanks to its 16 Gb sd card.
The HF100 camcorder; the newest in high def video recorders stems from Canon’s dynasty descended from optical quality, superior image analysis, stellar results, and scientific innovation in photography and network tv lenses.
Comparison Table
Parameters of Comparison | HF10 | HF100 |
---|---|---|
Megapixels | 3.32 megapixels with 2.27 effective megapixels. | 3.0 megapixels along with 2.07 effective megapixels. |
Available Colours | Black | Black, Silver and Grey. |
Focal Length and Autofocus | No autofocus option is available in HF10 and it consists of a 4.8 – 57.6 ff. | Autofocus option is available in this model. The focal length being 4.8 – 57 ff. |
Price | Ranges from $499-999 and is costlier than the HF100. | Ranges from $499-799 and is cheaper than the HF10. |
Release date and SDHC | The HF10 was released in April 2008 with a 16GB memory chip. | The HF100 was released in March 2008 with 8GB of SDHC memory. |
What is Canon HF10?
Canon’s HF10 handy-camera, which weighs less than 500g and fits into a trouser pocket, is the industry’s first HD handy-cam to record video on detachable sd card. MiniDV, hard disc, and Disc media were used in older iterations.
The HF10 is substantially lighter in weight than its ‘relatives,’ with 16GB of system storage capable of storing 6 to 8 hours of video at the maximum level of quality.
Released in April 2008, this handy-cam made it to the top charts in canon’s sale in no time. In standard-playmode state, the Hf10 requires 3.9 watts, whereas the HF100 needs 4.0 watts.
For video footage, the HF10 uses the AVCHD format. This codec is becoming the mainstream technology for HD video cameras, and it could be watched on Uhd TVs with laptop connections as well as Lumi discs.
What is Canon HF100?
The newest in full hd video cameras stems from Canon’s long heritage of image formation, superior image synthesis, stellar results, and scientific innovation in photography and broadcast tv cameras.
With the small, portable Canon VIXIA HF100, you may record in spectacular AVCHD (Advanced Video Codec High Definition) format while enjoying the convenience and many advantages of Flash Memory.
Assuming you keep the HF100 in your hand throughout filming, if it slips or users accidentally bump it against furniture, you’ll be relieved to hear that memory SDHC chips are much more shock resistant than alternative recorded storage methods.
With an 8 GB SDHC memory, the HF100 could last 3 hours in LP performance and 2 hours and mins in SP performance. In terms of pricing, the HF100 is considered to be less expensive than the HF10, with double memory capabilities.
Main Differences Between Canon HF10 and Canon HF100
- The recording and battery life on HF10 is dramatically more than that of HF100.
- HF10 is capable of processing 720p 60fps videos along with many other presets, whereas the 30fps option defaults in the HF100.
I appreciate the detailed comparison of the Canon HF10 and HF100 features. It has provided me with a better understanding of these cameras and how they differ from each other.
Your comment seems well-informed, but the content of the post lacks depth and essential details about the cameras.
The post has done an excellent job of providing an in-depth analysis of Canon HF10 and HF100. It’s refreshing to read insightful content like this.
I appreciate your erudite comment, but I find the post’s content to be verbose and not entirely accurate.
The information provided about Canon HF10 and HF100 is very comprehensive and informative. The detailed feature comparison helps in making an informed decision.
I think your comment is compelling, but I disagree with your opinion on the quality of the information provided.
The information provided about Canon HF10 and HF100 is very informative, and the comparison table helps in understanding which camera best suits my needs.
Your comment is enlightening, but it doesn’t provide sufficient understanding of the camera’s features.
Comparing Canon HF10 and HF100 based on their features and specifications is enlightening. The information provided helps me understand the uniqueness of each camera.
Your comment is beneficial, but it doesn’t convince me that these cameras are worth buying.
I second your opinion. This is the kind of information I have been searching for.
The comparison table is informative, and the detailed feature descriptions highlight the differences between the Canon HF10 and HF100. I am now well informed about these cameras.
Your comment might be insightful, but the comparison table lacks a few critical details.
I think the post exaggerates the capabilities of these cameras, and the comparison table is not entirely accurate.
I have never experienced such high-quality technology as these two Canon products. The information provided is clear and sufficient for understanding their differences. I appreciate the description of their capabilities and benefits.
Your comment is very educational, but I disagree with your opinion. These products are not as advanced as the post makes them look.
The post has provided a beneficial side by side comparison of Canon HF10 and HF100. It is detailed, and the comparison table makes it easier to distinguish the two products.
Your comment is thought-provoking, yet I think the features highlighted are not as intriguing as the post suggests.