A microphone functions by converting sound waves into an electrical signal. Several applications, such as sound recording, telephones, radio and television broadcasting etc., require microphones that differ in their build, quality and working methods.
Today’s technology-based world demands newer and improved ways every single day. Tons of microphone types are available in the market at present. Before the signal can be reproduced, the microphone needs to be connected to a preamplifier which further helps in the process.
Investing and getting the right product is not easy, provided a huge list of options is available. There are many companies out there with a lot of microphone preferences. But one that is worth the investment and accomplishes the job well is hard to find.
One such company is Blue which manufactures excellent quality mics that ensure highly efficient performance and are within budget. Blue Yeti and Blue Yeti Pro are two great mics produced by this company.
Key Takeaways
- Blue Yeti is a more affordable USB microphone with a frequency response range of 20Hz to 20kHz, while Blue Yeti Pro is a more advanced XLR/USB microphone with a frequency response range of 20Hz to 20kHz.
- Blue Yeti Pro offers more connectivity options, including XLR, USB, and 3.5mm audio output, while Blue Yeti only offers USB connectivity.
- Blue Yeti Pro is better suited for professional recording and streaming applications, while Blue Yeti is a great choice for home recording, podcasting, and streaming.
Blue Yeti vs Blue Yeti Pro
The Blue Yeti Pro has a higher maximum sample rate and bit depth than the Blue Yeti, allowing for higher-quality recordings. The Blue Yeti has a maximum sample rate of 48 kHz and a bit depth of 16-bit, while the Blue Yeti Pro has a maximum sample rate of 192 kHz and 24-bit.
To be precise, Blue Yeti Pro is an updated version of the former with some additional features.
Comparison Table
| Parameter of Comparison | Blue Yeti | Blue Yeti Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | Blue Yeti was introduced in 2010. | While Blue Yeti Pro was introduced in 2011. |
| Set up | It comes with a simpler setup, which can be easily done by even someone new to sound recording. | The setup needs a driver to be downloaded according to the system and version. |
| Design | It comes in a silver finish and has standard features. | It has a retro black studio finish with a huge set of features. |
| Quality | It offers a sample rate of 16-bit and 48 kHz. | Whereas it offers a higher sample rate of 24-bit and 192 kHz. |
| Performance | It gives a little bumpy output and picks up sibilant sounds more readily than Yeti Pro. | It provides comparatively smooth and flat output. |
| Frequency | It seems to be louder at higher-end frequencies resulting in distortion. | The frequency rate is more balanced here, and the distortion levels are also low. |
| Pricing | Blue Yeti retails for a comparatively lower price. | Whereas the Yeti Pro is more expensive. |
What is Blue Yeti?
In 2010, Blue came up with a microphone named Yeti which had some of the best features available in the market then. The mic has a simpler set-up that can be easily used by inexperienced people too.
Yeti instantly became popular among the masses because of its unique features at a reasonable price. Also, the mic could be easily plugged into a USB port. It provides users an easy way to record sound, podcasting, Skype calls and conferences.
Unlike the Pro model, Yeti has a silver finish to it. It has a mute button, although the knobs and buttons are a little loose compared to the Yeti Pro.
Regarding the headphone monitor circuit, Yeti has a noisy and breezy low-gain headphone amp, which is why it needs maximum gain for decent output levels.
Having four polar patterns, Blue Yeti beats every other microphone in terms of versatility. Anything and everything can be recorded with this mic.
What is Blue Yeti Pro?
Blue Yeti Pro was released in 2011 as an updated version of Yeti. This mic can record sound four times faster than the latter. Also, there is an XLR cable along with the USB port in Yeti Pro.
Due to this upgradation, Yeti Pro has both digital and analogue sides, unlike the standard Yeti version. This is why it has a more complex setup. It makes it even more attractive and comes with a retro black studio finish. No doubt, this adds a hint of luxury to it.
The mic has digital volume controls, and it spins infinitely. It also uses higher-quality ADC, which controls the distortion levels and balances the frequency. Overall, it provides the user with better sound quality.
The analogue side of the Yeti Pro has a much lower noise level than the digital one. In addition, it also has the options for EQ, pads and filters in it. Coming to the point, both the digital and analogue side of Yeti Pro is equally balanced and very convenient to use.
Main Differences Between Blue Yeti and Blue Yeti Pro
- Blue Yeti Pro is an updated version of Blue Yeti and comes with additional features.
- Yeti has a simpler setup when compared to the Pro model.
- Yeti Pro has a retro black studio finish, while Yeti has a silver finish.
- The output in Yeti Pro is smooth and flat, whereas it’s a little bumpy in Yeti.
- Yeti Pro is more expensive than the standard Yeti.
I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️
The comparison and analysis of the technical specifications are very well done. It’s refreshing to see such thorough research.
The article provides a wealth of information for anyone looking to invest in a quality microphone.
I agree. The level of detail in the comparison table is particularly impressive.
The article is very informative and gives a detailed comparison between Blue Yeti and Blue Yeti Pro. It’s very helpful for anyone in the market for a new microphone.
I found the breakdown of Blue Yeti and Blue Yeti Pro very insightful. It’s clear that each microphone has distinct advantages.
The comparison makes it easier to understand which microphone best suits specific recording needs.
Agreed. The article does a great job at highlighting the unique features of each microphone.
The detailed comparison table is really useful for weighing the pros and cons of each microphone. It allows for an easy comparison.
This level of detail makes it easier to make an informed decision about which microphone to choose.
I definitely agree. It’s nice to see all the features laid out side by side for comparison.
I appreciate the breakdown of the technical specifications and the in-depth comparison between Blue Yeti and Blue Yeti Pro. It’s great to see such detailed analysis.
It’s clear that Blue Yeti Pro has several advantages over the standard Blue Yeti. The article does a good job at highlighting these differences.
I agree, the enhanced features of the Yeti Pro make it a compelling option for professionals.
I think the added complexity of the Yeti Pro’s setup could be a disadvantage for some users.
The article gives a comprehensive overview of the Blue Yeti and Blue Yeti Pro, making it easier for consumers to make an informed choice.
Yes, the detailed breakdown is really helpful for understanding the differences.
The article makes a strong case for considering the specific use cases of each microphone before making a purchase.
The detailed comparison of Blue Yeti and Blue Yeti Pro is quite comprehensive. It provides a clear picture of the differences and applications of each microphone.
I appreciate the level of detail in the comparison. It’s rare to find such thorough analysis on these products.
I’m impressed with the breakdown of Blue Yeti and Blue Yeti Pro. It’s clear that both have their own strengths and applications.
Agreed. The article presents a fair and balanced comparison of both microphones.
I appreciate the objective comparison between Blue Yeti and Blue Yeti Pro. It doesn’t seem biased towards one or the other.
Agreed. It’s clear that the article is focused on providing factual information rather than pushing a particular product.