Sharing is caring!

As the bit rate of a microphone determines the product’s efficacy and the quality of sound produced and recorded, the Blue Yeti Nano model secures a significantly superior position than the Blue Yeti model. Thus, an amplified audio quality is guaranteed with the Yeti Nano model.

Key Takeaways

  1. Blue Yeti is a larger and heavier microphone than the Blue Yeti Nano, which is more compact and lightweight.
  2. The Blue Yeti has a better frequency response range than the Blue Yeti Nano, allowing it to capture a wider range of sounds and produce higher-quality recordings.
  3. The Blue Yeti has additional features, such as a mute button, gain control, and multiple polar patterns, while the Blue Yeti Nano has a simpler design with fewer features.

Blue Yeti vs. Nano

Blue Yeti is a microphone model with a multi-pattern USB, tri-capsule technology, and a bit rate of 16-bit/48kHz. It is mainly used for gaming but can be used in podcasts, streaming, and music videos. Nano is a Blue Yeti microphone model with a bit rate of 24-bit/48kHz and two condenser systems.

Quiche vs Souffle 2023 04 22T123346.893

Comparison Table

Parameters of ComparisonBlue YetiBlue Yeti Nano
Sample Bit RateThe Blue Yeti model boasts a bit rate of 16 bits/48kHz.The Blue Yeti Nano model has an elevated bit rate of 24 bits/48kHz.
Operational ModesThe Stereo and Bidirectional modes are available with this model.The Stereo and Bidirectional modes are absent from the Nano model.
CapsulesBlue Yeti is equipped with 3 Blue-proprietary condenser capsules.Blue Yeti Nano model is equipped with only 2-Blue proprietary condenser capsules.
DesignThis model is bulkier than the Nano variant.This model is more compact and comparatively sleeker than the Yeti model.
Optional Shock mountsThe Blue Yeti USB microphone is compatible with the Radius III and Radius II optional shock mounts.The Blue Yeti Nano microphone is compatible with the Radius III optional shock mount.
PriceThis model is more expensive than the Nano version.The Blue Yeti Nano is the most cost-effective and affordable model in the range of USB microphones Blue offers.
WeightThe Blue Yeti microphone is significantly heavier than the Nano model.This model is lighter than the Yeti variant.

What is Blue Yeti?

The Blue Yeti model was launched to create a professional, multi-pattern USB microphone. The tri-capsule technology that sets this USB microphone a class apart from its market competitors is a signature element of the Blue brand.

Also Read:  HomePod vs Echo Studio: Difference and Comparison

The Blue Yeti microphone produces pristine studio-quality recordings with an impressive bit rate of 16 bits/48kHz and 4 different pattern settings.

The microphone can record vocals for podcasts, YouTube videos, music videos, Twitter streaming, etc. This model is available in various colors: black, cool grey, white, and silver.  

The Blue Yeti microphone has 4 formidable modes, including the Cardioid mode, the Bidirectional mode, the Stereo mode, and the Omnidirectional mode. It also comes with a zero latency monitoring feature.

This model exemplifies the brand’s claim that it is a versatile microphone for professional recording sessions. The ease of the ‘Plug ‘n Play’ spec makes it compatible with Macs and other PCs.

blue yeti

What is Blue Yeti Nano?

The Blue Yeti Nano model is a novel addition to the Blue Yeti range of USB microphones. It was specifically designed to produce broadcast-quality audio content. This model has 2 Blue-proprietary condenser capsules and an elevated bit rate of 24 bits/48 kHz.

The core element of designing this sleek, premium model was to ease the process of streaming and recording. It is perfect for those seeking a microphone for gaming, video streaming, podcasting, or recording music videos.

The brand has popularized this microphone as its most compact footprint-producing model. The no-latency feature further adds to the value of this model.

The Nano model operates with two modes. The Stereo and Bidirectional modes are absent from the Nano interface.

However, the microphone is compatible with well-known and popular apps like Skype, YouTube, Discord, Twitch, etc. An additional benefit of this quality device is that it is available at an unbelievably cost-effective price.

blue yeti nano

Main Differences Between Blue Yeti and Nano

  1. The main difference between the Blue Yeti and Nano models is that the former model has a lower bit rate than the latter. The recording sample bit rate for the Blue Yeti model is 24 bit/48kHz, while that for the Yeti model is only 16 bit/48kHz. This exemplifies a better audio quality guarantee with the Nano model.
  2. The Blue Yeti model has 3 Blue-proprietary condenser capsules as compared to the 2 Blue-proprietary condenser capsules of the Nano model.
  3. The Stereo and Bidirectional modes are available with the Blue Yeti model. Both these modes are absent from the Yeti Nano interface.
  4. The Blue Nano model can only be paired with the Radius III optional shock mount. At the same time, the Blue Yeti model can be paired with the Radius II and Radius III optional shock mounts.
  5. The Nano model is smaller and sleeker than the Yeti model.
  6. The two USB microphone variants also differ in terms of their market prices. The Blue Yeti model is more expensive than the Nano model.
  7. The Nano model is lighter than the Blue Yeti variant. The former weighs about 1.39 lbs, while the latter weighs approximately 1.2 lbs without the stand.
Difference Between X and Y 2023 04 22T123758.348
References
  1. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/remotecourse/back-matter/specific-examples-of-video-set-ups/
Also Read:  iRobot Roomba i7+ vs Roomba s9+: Difference and Comparison
dot 1
One request?

I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️

Want to save this article for later? Click the heart in the bottom right corner to save to your own articles box!

By Sandeep Bhandari

Sandeep Bhandari holds a Bachelor of Engineering in Computers from Thapar University (2006). He has 20 years of experience in the technology field. He has a keen interest in various technical fields, including database systems, computer networks, and programming. You can read more about him on his bio page.