Cisco Packet Tracer vs GNS3: Difference and Comparison

Cisco Packet Tracer and GNS3 are two popular network management and simulation programs that may be used to prepare for certification tests or network feature testing without the need to purchase costly right techniques.

The two pieces of software were built to satisfy distinct purposes. Amongst both, GNS3 is an open-source network simulator. 

They might sound similar but they are equipped with quite a few features which distinguish them from each other. This article focuses on the differences between both network simulation programmes.

Key Takeaways

  1. Cisco Packet Tracer is a network simulation software designed for Cisco devices, while GNS3 supports multiple network vendors.
  2. Packet Tracer is ideal for beginners and educational purposes, while GNS3 caters to advanced users and real-world network simulation.
  3. Cisco Packet Tracer offers limited device emulation, while GNS3 provides extensive device emulation through integration with virtual machines.

Cisco Packet Tracer vs GNS3

Cisco packet tracer has the inbuilt OS and emulated program files as well as is optimised for easy use and is not an open-source program, but the GNS3 is not equipped with an in-built OS and consumes the device’s RAM and is an open-source program. GSN3 is not easy to use and is not for newcomers.

Cisco Packet Tracer vs GNS3

Cisco Packet Tracer’s major goal is to assist students in understanding networking fundamentals via practical learning experience while also developing Cisco-specific abilities.

This program cannot upgrade existing routers or switches because the protocols are implemented solely in software. Surprisingly, this utility includes not only Cisco equipment but also a wide range of other network equipment.

Although it is not an open-source program, it is still widely used because of its user interface and the vast range of functions.

GNS3, on the other hand, is a network emulator that uses Dynamips and QEMU to run genuine IOS images, virtual machines, and other network-related applications.

The amount of resources (CPU / RAM) available on the PC for executing the lab’s simulated IOS images and virtual machines for clients & servers simulation is GNS3’s primary constraint.

GNS3 will be more feature-rich than PT’s (Packet Tracer) emulator because it boots genuine IOS images. In GNS3, you may also use additional Virtual servers to connect with the routers, but in PT, the “hosts” only enable ping testing as well as DNS/DHCP configuration.

Also Read:  Cisco DNA vs ACI: Difference and Comparison

Comparison Table

Parameters of ComparisonCisco Packet TracerGNS3
Connectivity RangeIt enables the use of CLI (command line interface) on switches, routers, and servers, as well as the addition of edge nodes such as voice phones, laptops, and PCs.It allows users to access the operating system of routers, but not switches or other types of end user devices.
RAM ConsumptionIt does not use up any of the device’s RAM and is more lightweight.It uses up all of the device’s RAM. Each router is expected to use about 512 MB of RAM.
IOS Images and FeaturesIt uses the same Cisco IOS images as a real-time Cisco router and responds in the same way. It provides a simulated IOS with limited functionality based on incomplete characteristics.It uses the same Cisco IOS images as a real-time Cisco router and responds in the same way. It provides a simulated IOS with limited functionality based on incomplete characteristics.
Internet Gen SupportIt’s emulated with 3G/4G capabilities.There are no 3G/4G support features simulated.
Use of Catalyst SwitchesThis cross-platform graphical simulation tool includes simulated catalyst switches.In this VPS hosting emulator, there are no Catalyst Switches.

What is Cisco Packet Tracer?

Cisco Packet Tracer is a communication system teaching and learning application that provides a unique blend of productive environment and visualization experiences, evaluation, activity authoring capabilities, multi-user collaboration, and challenges facing.

Packet Tracer’s improved strategies will aid students and instructors in collaborating, solving issues, and learning ideas.

The main highlight of the Cisco Packet Tracer is that it gives a consistent simulation experience and visualization learning environment to augment classroom equipment, including the ability to observe internal operations that are concealed on real devices in real time.

It also allows for several co-operations, real-time collaboration, and a competitive environment for dynamic learning and networking.

Before deploying any protocol, engineers want to test it using Cisco Packet Tracer. Engineers that want to deploy any modification in the supply chain prefer to utilize Cisco Packet Tracer to test the modifications first and then deploy if and only if everything works as planned.

Also Read:  Virtual Private Gateway vs Transit Gateway: Difference and Comparison

Engineers will be able to add and delete virtual networks more easily as a result of this.

The minimum requirements for running Cisco Packet Tracer are:

  1. For 64-bit: A computer with one of the following operating systems: Microsoft Windows 8.1, 10 (64bit), Ubuntu 20.04 LTS (64bit), or macOS 10.14 or newer. Equipped with an amd64(x86-64) CPU, 4GB of free RAM as well as at least 1.4GB of hard disk space.
  2. For 32-bit: Computer with one of the following operating systems: Microsoft Windows 8.1, 10 (32bit) OS, x86 compatible Intel or AMD CPU, 2GB of RAM, and minimum disk space of 1.4GB.

What is GNS3?

GNS3, the abbreviation of Graphical Network Simulator-3, is an open-source software used for the simulation of complicated networks and processing them in real-time. All of this is accomplished without the need for network gear along with networking equipment. 

For computer technicians and network engineers, administrators, and those preparing for Cisco CCNA, CCNP, and CCIE certifications, as well as Juniper JNCIA certifications, GNS3 is a perfect option or addition to actual labs. Also included is open-source networking.  

It may also be used to try out new features or test settings before they are deployed on actual devices. Their software provides interesting capabilities, such as connecting your virtual network to real-world networks and utilizing Wireshark to collect packets.

GNS3 employs the following emulators to run the exact same operating systems as in real networks in order to give full and realistic simulations:

  1. Dynamips, A well-known Cisco IOS emulator.
  2. Qemu is a generic open-source emulator that runs Cisco ASA, PIX, and IPS.
  3. Virtualbox runs desktop and server operating systems and JunOS.

Main Differences Between Cisco Packet Tracer and GNS3

  1. Cisco Packet Tracer is not open-source free-to-use software, whereas GNS3 is open-source.
  2. Packet Tracer does not provide ASDM ASA configuration support, but it is accessible for GMS3 users.
  3. Packet Tracer supports 3rd and 4th generation internet, but GNS3 doesn’t support any of them.
  4. Cisco Packet Tracer does not consume the virtual or physical RAM of the computer, but GMS3 requires that.
  5. ASDM and ASA are not supported in Packet Tracer, whereas it is supported in GSM3.
References
  1. https://www.netacad.com/courses/packet-tracer/faq#1
  2. https://techlustt.com/2020/05/what-is-the-difference-between-gns3-and-packet-tracer/

Last Updated : 14 October, 2023

dot 1
One request?

I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️

22 thoughts on “Cisco Packet Tracer vs GNS3: Difference and Comparison”

  1. The comprehensive explanation of Cisco Packet Tracer and GNS3’s features, particularly their emulation capabilities and target users, offers a holistic comparison between these network simulation programs, making it easier for readers to choose the right tool for their needs.

    Reply
    • The detailed analysis of Cisco Packet Tracer and GNS3’s differences is quite enlightening. It enables readers to have a better understanding of the unique attributes and functionalities of each tool.

      Reply
  2. The article provides a detailed comparison between Cisco Packet Tracer and GNS3, highlighting their distinct features and purposes. The explanation about connectivity range, RAM consumption, IOS images, and features is particularly informative.

    Reply
  3. The in-depth comparison table and clear explanations provide a comprehensive understanding of how Cisco Packet Tracer and GNS3 differ in terms of features and functionalities. This is helpful for those looking to choose the right network management tool.

    Reply
    • The article’s thorough comparison of Cisco Packet Tracer and GNS3 helps readers understand the nuances of each program, aiding them in making an informed decision when selecting a network simulation tool.

      Reply
    • I appreciate the detailed explanation of the connectivity range, RAM consumption, and IOS images between Cisco Packet Tracer and GNS3. It’s quite beneficial for those evaluating these tools for their networking needs.

      Reply
  4. The article’s detailed comparison between Cisco Packet Tracer and GNS3 provides an insightful overview of the functionalities and target users of both programs. It’s helpful for readers seeking network management and simulation tools.

    Reply
  5. The article’s detailed descriptions of Cisco Packet Tracer and GNS3’s capabilities and the comparison table provide a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and limitations of each tool for network simulations.

    Reply
    • I found the article’s emphasis on the primary constraints and functions of GNS3 and Cisco Packet Tracer quite insightful, helping in identifying which program aligns better with specific networking requirements.

      Reply
  6. The article’s thorough comparison of Cisco Packet Tracer and GNS3 offers valuable insights into their purposes and capabilities, making it easier for individuals to choose the right network simulation tool based on their needs and expertise.

    Reply
    • I found the article’s emphasis on the distinct features of Cisco Packet Tracer and GNS3 quite helpful, especially when making an informed decision regarding which tool to utilize for network simulations.

      Reply
  7. This article presents a comprehensive comparison between Cisco Packet Tracer and GNS3, shedding light on their distinct features, purposes, and resource consumption. The information provided is valuable for those involved in network management and simulations.

    Reply
    • The detailed insights into the RAM consumption and IOS images of both Cisco Packet Tracer and GNS3 provide a clear picture of their capabilities, aiding in decision-making for network professionals.

      Reply
    • The article’s comparison between Cisco Packet Tracer and GNS3 offers a comprehensive understanding of their functionality differences, making it easier for readers to identify which tool suits their networking requirements.

      Reply
  8. This article offers a thorough comparison of Cisco Packet Tracer and GNS3, focusing on their unique attributes and targeted users. The clarity in explanations is commendable.

    Reply
  9. The discussion about the purposes, target users, and emulation capabilities of Cisco Packet Tracer versus GNS3 is highly informative. It’s useful for those who are interested in network management and simulation tools.

    Reply
    • I found the explanations regarding the advantages and constraints of each program quite enlightening. It makes it easier to understand which one would be more suitable for specific requirements.

      Reply
    • The article provides valuable insights into the functionalities and intended applications of Cisco Packet Tracer and GNS3, which is beneficial for individuals working within the networking field.

      Reply
  10. There’s a comprehensive discussion on the differences between Cisco Packet Tracer and GNS3, especially when it comes to their intended users and features. The comparison table makes it easier to grasp the variations in functionality.

    Reply
    • Absolutely, the detailed comparisons help in understanding which program might be suitable for different users depending on their requirements.

      Reply
    • The article presents a clear analysis of the strengths and limitations of both Cisco Packet Tracer and GNS3, helping the readers make an informed choice based on their needs and expertise in networking.

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Want to save this article for later? Click the heart in the bottom right corner to save to your own articles box!