Cisco ISE vs Aruba Clear-Pass: Difference and Comparison

Cisco ISE and Aruba Clear-Pass are Network access tools. They provide various services in network security and IT security. Both are available in different versions.

Both of them have excellent features and services. Access policies are a list of roles and the resources with which roles are to be provisioned or de-provisioned.

Access policies are used to automate the provisioning of target systems to users. To manage and control the flow of network security, we may have many policies for a network in the IT industry.

We have many platforms to manage and control these access policies, but Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) and Aruba Clear-Pass are famous platforms many industries use.

Key Takeaways

  1. Cisco ISE is a network access control solution that offers centralized policy enforcement and secure access.
  2. Aruba ClearPass provides network access control, policy management, and guest access features.
  3. Both solutions help secure networks, but they differ in terms of their vendor-specific features and integrations.

Cisco ISE versus Aruba Clear-Pass

Cisco ISE is a comprehensive security policy management platform that provides device profiling, posture assessment, guest access, and access control policies. Aruba ClearPass provides secure access to enterprise networks with features such as network device profiling, guest access management, and device onboarding.

Cisco ISE versus Aruba Clear Pass

Cisco ISE is an old platform with unique features. Cisco is one of the top IT industry sectors with more than lakhs of employees.

Cisco ISE maintains security policy management. Cisco ISE stands for Cisco Identity Service Engine.

The major work of the Cisco ISE is securing the networks. The Cisco ISE, which connects the switches and routers, enforces security and access policies.

Aruba Clear-Pass is also an air quality management platform that many businesses are implementing effectively on new devices, granting various axis levels and keeping the security system and network security more secure.

Also Read:  PBX vs VoIP: Difference and Comparison

It also issues more safely connections to business and personal devices to the network in compliance with your security policies.

Comparison Table

Parameters of comparisonCisco ISEAruba Clear-Pass
CategoriesCisco ISE has NACAruba Clear-Pass has NAC, IT security, and network security.
AlternativesCisco ISE has Genian-NAC as alternativeAruba Clear-Pass has Forti-NAC as alternative
User InterfaceCisco ISE has a slow working user interface.Aruba Clear-Pass has a smooth and fast working user interface.
FlexibilityCisco ISE is less flexible compared to Aruba Clear-PassAruba Clear-Pass is more flexible
ImplementationThe implementation is quite easy in Cisco ISE.The implementation is difficult in Aruba Clear-Pass

What is Cisco ISE?

Cisco ISE is an old platform with unique features. Cisco is one of the top IT industry sectors with more than lakhs of employees.

The security policy management is maintained by Cisco ISE. Cisco ISE stands for Cisco Identity Service Engine. The major work of the Cisco ISE is securing the networks.

The Cisco ISE, which connects the switches and routers, enforces security and access policies.

The purpose is to simplify identity management across diverse devices and applications. Nowadays, most organization uses ISE, which is more advanced.

It provides a Control plan security, Context sharing with Eco-system, and visibility. To manage and control the flow of network security, we may have many policies for a network in the IT industry.

Mostly we use the traditional way of authentication, which is using and username and fixed password but we have a more secure method like cryptographic techniques, such as using handshake protocols, one-time passwords, and advanced EAP-based protocol, which proposes ISE is more secure.

What is Aruba Clear-Pass?

Aruba Clear-Pass is also an air quality management platform that many businesses are implementing effectively on new devices, granting various axis levels and keeping the security system and network security more secure.

It also issues more safely connections to business and personal devices to the network in compliance with your security policies.

Also Read:  Rj12 vs Rj14: Difference and Comparison

To manage and control the flow of network security, we may have many policies for a network in the IT industry.

Clear processes provide more security for the business and allow you to safely connect with the basis of the network and leverage their three basic plans: Identifying devices, type and name of the device, MAC address, IP address, and OS and version number.

Enforcing the policies of onboarding new devices without involvement in their
server.

To protect the device, they use a firewall, Enterprises mobile management (EMM), Mobile device management (MD), Security information, and event management (SIEM).

Aruba has many services and is easy to use. It has a well-developed platform and unique services. These make Aruba Clear-Pass a better network security management system.

Main Differences Between Cisco ISE and Aruba Clear-Pass

  1. Cisco ISE has NAC, and Aruba Clear-Pass has NAC, IT security, and network security.
  2. Cisco ISE has Genian-NAC as an alternative, and Aruba Clear-Pass has Forti-NAC as an alternative.
  3. Cisco ISE has a slow-working user interface, and Aruba Clear-Pass has a smooth and fast-working user interface.
  4. Cisco ISE is less flexible compared to Aruba Clear-Pass.
  5. The implementation is easy in Cisco ISE, but the implementation is difficult in Aruba Clear-Pass.
References
  1. https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.08795
  2. https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/345970

Last Updated : 13 July, 2023

dot 1
One request?

I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️

6 thoughts on “Cisco ISE vs Aruba Clear-Pass: Difference and Comparison”

  1. Comparing Cisco ISE and Aruba Clear-Pass was insightful. Both have their unique features but it seems the implementation is easier in Cisco ISE as opposed to Aruba Clear-Pass.

    Reply
  2. The article gives a deep insight into how Aruba Clear-Pass provides more secure connections to networks and devices. It’s a significant aspect of IT security.

    Reply
  3. The comparative analysis of the user interface between Cisco ISE and Aruba Clear-Pass is very informative. It helps in making an informed choice for businesses.

    Reply
  4. I appreciate the thorough explanations of access policies and their application in the industry. It’s a great help for businesses.

    Reply
  5. The detailed comparison of Cisco ISE and Aruba Clear-Pass is insightful. It’s always a good idea to weigh your options in network security management.

    Reply
  6. The information about advanced EAP-based protocol adds value to the discussion of Cisco ISE. It’s a more secure method that’s worth considering.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Want to save this article for later? Click the heart in the bottom right corner to save to your own articles box!