QTP 10 and QTP 11 are two versions of the Quick Test Professional (QTP), which is a testing instrument used to assess an individual’s ability using a competent Graphic User Interface.
Standard Imports, web items, Advanced X controls,.Net, SAP, visual basic apps, Java, Siebel, PeopleSoft, Oracle, and interface emulators are just a few of the things it can aid with. So let’s take a look at some of the differences between QTP 10 and QTP 11 and see how they compare and contrast.
Key Takeaways
- QTP 11 has more features and improvements than QTP 10.
- QTP 11 supports more technologies and platforms than QTP 10.
- QTP 11 has better integration with other testing tools than QTP 10.
QTP 10 vs QTP 11
QTP 10, released in 2009, offers keyword-driven testing as one of its key features. This approach enables testers to create test cases using keywords that describe the intended action rather than scripting every step manually. QTP 11, released in 2010, offers improved support for testing modern web applications. It has enhanced support for web 2.0 and AJAX-based applications, making it easier to test these applications.
New quality centre 10.00 integration features are included in this edition of QuickTest Professional 10 (QTP 10). A new dependency and resource structure for acquiring and editing joint assets, as well as a one-of-a-kind platform for Quality centre moderators to help upgrade all QuickTest holdings, which can be used with new capabilities, are just a few of the highlights.
QTP11’s unique features include the ability to recognize objects using CSS and Xpath. QTP 11 has also improved the results viewer. It now includes visualizations such as graphs and charts, as well as a full description of the research taken.
When contrasted to “ordinal identifier” properties, in which object authorization is based on associations with surrounding objects, the conventional object recognition procedure has been enhanced to incorporate “Visual Relation Identifier” capabilities.
Comparison Table
| Parameters of Comparison | QTP 10 | QTP 11 |
|---|---|---|
| Methods of Identifications | QTP 10 has limited methods of identifications. | QTP 11 has numerous methods of identifications. |
| Expression creation | Regular expression creation is tough in QTP 10 | In comparison to QTP 10, regular expression creation is easy in QTP 11. |
| Firefox recording | Does not support firefox recording. | Does support firefox recording. |
| Result viewer | The result viewer is lower in quality. | Comparatively, better in quality in the form of pie charts and statics. |
| Application Functionality | Not possible to test GUI and UI- less application functionality. | Possible to test GUI and UI- less application functionality. |
What is QTP 10?
QTP 10 is an automated unit testing tool that assists testers in running automated studies to check any flaws, malfunctions, or voids in the program under the test’s expected outcomes.
Mercury Interactive created it, which was eventually owned by HP and is now MicroFocus. QuickTestPro is the full form of QTP. This version of QuickTest Professional includes new quality centre 10.00 integration capabilities.
Functionality for baselines and asset versioning, a new dependencies and resources architecture for collecting and manipulating joint assets, and a unique tool for Quality centre admins to help upgrade all QuickTest assets that can be used with new features are just a few of the characteristics.
Application regions, components, function libraries, checks, recovery scenarios, exterior statistical analyses, and shared object repositories are all included in the assets.
This version includes an Asset Comparison tool that allows you to compare different asset versions and a local system monitoring tool that assists in analyzing the computer’s resources consumed by applications.
Only normal object identification can be used by QTP10 to identify objects. It is flexible to run only on Windows, and It is only compatible with the QTP extended IDE. QTP 10 always comes with its own object library.
What is QTP 11?
QTP 11 (Quick Test Professional) is also an automated testing program that enables testers to run automated research to confirm any flaws in the application under the test’s expected results. It’s a symbol tool that performs an application’s failure and integration tests. It has both recording and playback capabilities.
New features have been added to QTP 11. The innovative capabilities in QTP11 are by using CSS and Xpath, and it can recognize objects. The results viewer in QTP 11 has also been improved. It now provides a detailed overview of the tests completed, replete with graphics such as charts and graphs.
The standard object identification method has been upgraded to include “Visual Relation Identifier” features when compared to “ordinal identifier” characteristics, in which item authentication is based on relationships with nearby objects.
The Log Tracking feature in QTP 11 allows you to collaborate with programmers to identify the core causes of unusual behaviour in your application. The Log Tracking feature allows you to collaborate with programmers to identify the core causes of unusual behaviour in your application.
In QTP 11, applications that use the Web 2.0 toolkit are supported. Web Add-in Extensibility-based add-ins for GWT,ASP.NET Ajax, Dojo Web 2.0, and Yahoo UI toolkits are available in QuickTest 11.
Main Differences Between QTP 10 and QTP 11
- Object identification methods are more numerous in QTP 11, but they are not numerous in QTP 10.
- QTP 11’s results viewer is superior to QTP 10’s.
- QTP 11 has the ability to load libraries during runtime, whereas on the other hand, QTP 10 does not.
- QTP 11 supports Web 2.0 Toolkit apps natively, whereas on the other hand, QTP 10 does not.
- QTP 11 has the ability to have multiple license servers, while QTP 10 does not.
- Regular expression development in QTP11 is much easier than it was in QTP10.
Last Updated : 05 August, 2023
I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️
Sandeep Bhandari holds a Bachelor of Engineering in Computers from Thapar University (2006). He has 20 years of experience in the technology field. He has a keen interest in various technical fields, including database systems, computer networks, and programming. You can read more about him on his bio page.
The detailed explanations of what QTP 10 and QTP 11 offer are very informative. It’s important to have a clear understanding of the features to utilize these tools effectively.
The addition of support for Firefox recording in QTP 11 is an important step. It expands the capability and scope of the tool significantly.
The integration capabilities in QTP 10 with new quality centre is an exceptional feature that streamlines the testing process. It’s great to see such advancements.
The advances in QTP 11 with its improved result viewer is really commendable. It provides a comprehensive overview of the tests, which is essential for effective analysis.
Both QTP 10 and QTP 11 seem to have their distinct advantages. It’s crucial for testers to understand the differences to make the right choice based on their requirements.
The evolution from QTP 10 to QTP 11 is staggering. The improvements and new features in QTP 11 really add a lot of value to testers.
QTP 11’s added support for modern web applications and its expanded integration with other testing tools makes it a promising choice for testers looking for advanced capabilities.
QTP 10 and QTP 11 are powerful tools for automated testing. Great article that highlights the key differences!
Completely agree with you. Both tools are impressive and have their unique features that make them stand out.
The introduction of the Visual Relation Identifier in QTP 11 for object identification is a significant enhancement. It shows the continuous innovation in this tool.
The comparison table is very helpful. It clearly outlines the differences between QTP 10 and QTP 11, making it easier for testers to understand which version suits their needs.