QTP vs WinRunner: Difference and Comparison

The testing phase plays a vital role in the software development cycle. It is a demanding skill, and many younger generations are attracted to the testing process because it doesn’t need any prerequisites like coding and other requirements.

The available tools make your work easy as eating sweets. The QTP and WinRunner are some tools that help in testing the graphical user interface.

User satisfaction is the principle for the product creator. The tools give you get a feel of what people want and how to implement that.

Key Takeaways

  1. QTP (Quick Test Professional) is now known as UFT (Unified Functional Testing), while WinRunner is an older, discontinued testing tool.
  2. QTP supports scripting in VBScript, while WinRunner uses TSL (Test Script Language).
  3. QTP offers better integration with other software and applications, whereas WinRunner has limited compatibility.

QTP Vs WinRunner

QTP (Quick Test Professional) is a functional testing tool that allows testers to automate functional and regression testing for software applications. WinRunner is a functional testing tool that was also developed by Mercury Interactive. It uses TSL as its scripting language and provides a graphical user interface for creating and executing test scripts.

QTP Vs WinRunner

Unified Functional Testing(UFT) is the new title of QTP (QuickTest Professional ). It can perform testing services. Microfocus is the developer of QTP. It will be released and available in the market in 2019.

The QTP works on Microsoft Windows as an operating system. Mercury Interactive was the first to design the QTP, and then HP got the license, and now Microfocus is the owner of QTP.

WinRunner is the HP software used to test the Graphical User Interface(GUI). It allows you to playback the interactions as test scripts.

It supports many technologies, including live JAVA, DOTNET, HTML, and Power Builder.

The WinRunner works on TSL (Test Script Language), similar to the C programming language. It is dependent on the Windows platform.

It works on the concept called object-oriented technology and works only with static images.

Also Read:  HTTP 1.0 vs HTTP 1.1: Difference and Comparison

Comparison Table

Parameters on comparisonQTPWinRunner
DefinitionThe QTP is a testing tool for functional and service testingThe WinRunner is a tool that can record the interactions in a test script language.
ImageQTP works with static and dynamic images.WinRunner works with static images.
OwnershipMicrofocus the owner of QTPWinRunner works with static images.
Last released versionQTP is 15.0.2WinRunner is 9.2
Active screenQTP supports the active screenWinRunner has not supported the active screen.
Keyword viewSupportedNot Supported
Scripting language usedQTP work on VB scriptWinRunner work on TSL language.

What is QTP?

The QTP is a functional testing tool that works automatically in the background. It helps to find the errors in the application by undergoing the testing process. The VB script is predominant to use the QTP tool.

You must know the VB script to achieve the process in QTP. Create, record, enhance, debug, run, analyze and report are the seven steps in the QTP testing process.

Quick Test Professional is the expansion of QTP and is the invention of Hewlett Packard (HP).

The tools available in QTP are Test management tools, Configuration management tools, Static analysis tools, Test preparation tools, Test execution tools, Test comparators, Coverage measurement tools, Performance testing tools, Project planning and tracking tools, and Incident management tools.

At first, Astra Quick Test is the Name of it after it is QTP, and presently it is called UFT. When compared to other scripting languages, the VB script is much easy to learn.

The tool itself can generate the report results in time management. But it takes more time to execute. You need to spend more money to get the license of QTP, which is quite expensive.

Like other tools, environmental setup is a must to get a peaceful working experience.

What is WinRunner?

The WinRunner is working on the Windows operating system based on HP. Despite its needs and some obligation, it supports many languages.

It is easy to use and interact with the screen. First, you need to create a GUI map file and then create the test scripts. At last, debug, and run smoothly.

Also Read:  Teamviewer vs Ultraviewer: Difference and Comparison

It needs external devices to install on your computer. Add the external storage device before downloading. Then adding the executable file and then running on it will help to recover if deleted occasionally.

The version of the object and the GUI file must be the same. Else it won’t compact with the WinRunner version and result in a hang of your computer. Sometimes browsers are not connected with WinRunner versions.

It is a prerequisite to check the browser version before installing.

It gives quick and quality assurance. It is the only reason many people suggest Winrunner will help you to get the fast process. The 9.2 is the recently released version of WinRunner.

It is also called Mercury WinRunner. The processing of images consists of two modes, that is context-sensitivity mode and analogue mode. The context-sensitivity is the default mode. The WinRunner doesn’t support the XML language.

Main Differences Between QTP and WinRunner

  1. The QTP supports the keyword view, and WinRunner does not support the keyword view.
  2. The QTP has a screen recorder option, but WinRunner has no screen recorder option.
  3. The QTP supports the XML language, but the WinRunner does not support the XML language.
  4. The QTP works on shared repository mode, and the WinRunner works on GUI global mode.
  5. The QTP supports the .NET environment, but WinRunner doesn’t support the .NET environment.
  6. The QTP work on the VB script, and WinRunner works on the TSL language.
  7. The QTP has 15.0.2 as the latest version, and WinRunner has 9.2 as the new version.
References
  1. https://jusst.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Performance-Testing-Tools-A-Comparative-Study-of-QTP-LoadRunner-WinRunner-and-JUnit.pdf
  2. https://search.proquest.com/openview/1dacebb28e95f0fe3d02d707524788c8/1.pdf?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=616605

Last Updated : 02 August, 2023

dot 1
One request?

I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️

23 thoughts on “QTP vs WinRunner: Difference and Comparison”

  1. The descriptions of QTP and WinRunner, including their functionalities, scripting languages, and system compatibility, are very informative. It’s beneficial for professionals in the software development field.

    Reply
  2. The historical background and technological aspects of WinRunner, such as its dependencies, support for various technologies, and scripting language, provide valuable knowledge for those considering its usage.

    Reply
    • I completely agree, Alan. The comprehensive information about WinRunner’s functionality and system requirements delivers a clear understanding of the tool’s capabilities and constraints.

      Reply
  3. The overview of QTP and WinRunner, along with the historical background and differences, is well-presented. It provides a comprehensive understanding of these testing tools.

    Reply
    • I couldn’t agree more, Ray. The in-depth analysis of QTP and WinRunner brings clarity to the selection process for organizations and individuals looking for testing solutions.

      Reply
  4. The detailed information about the features and functionalities of QTP and WinRunner is immensely beneficial for individuals seeking to enhance their understanding of testing tools and frameworks.

    Reply
    • Absolutely, Helena. The comprehensive insights into QTP and WinRunner aid in creating a knowledge base for proficient decision-making in the software testing landscape.

      Reply
  5. The explanations of QTP’s transformation into UFT, as well as its capabilities and operating system compatibility, offer valuable insights into the evolution of this testing tool.

    Reply
    • Absolutely, Jayden. The details about QTP’s transition to UFT and the considerations for its usage provide a holistic view of the tool’s functionality.

      Reply
  6. The detailed explanation of QTP and WinRunner, including their compatibility, scripting languages, and support features, equips software professionals with valuable insights for test automation and quality assurance.

    Reply
    • I couldn’t agree more, Keeley. The comprehensive breakdown of QTP and WinRunner’s capabilities and characteristics provides an excellent resource for professionals in the software testing domain.

      Reply
    • Well articulated, Keeley. The thorough coverage of QTP and WinRunner functionalities empowers testers and developers with essential knowledge to make informed decisions about using these testing tools.

      Reply
  7. The in-depth description of QTP’s functionalities and the VB script language, along with its shortcomings and strengths, is essential for professionals involved in software testing and development.

    Reply
    • Well said, Laura. The detailed analysis of QTP’s features and the importance of VB script language proficiency highlight the critical aspects of using the testing tool effectively.

      Reply
  8. The clear descriptions and comparisons between QTP and WinRunner, along with their differences and applications, offer valuable guidance for testers, developers, and quality assurance professionals.

    Reply
    • Absolutely, Npalmer. The comprehensive analysis of QTP and WinRunner provides a solid foundation for individuals in the software testing domain to make informed decisions based on their testing requirements.

      Reply
    • I agree with you, Npalmer. The detailed exposition of QTP and WinRunner’s functionalities and comparison table is an excellent resource for understanding and evaluating these testing tools.

      Reply
  9. The comparison table detailing the features of QTP and WinRunner is immensely helpful for evaluating the suitability of each tool for specific testing requirements.

    Reply
    • I found the details about QTP and WinRunner to be comprehensive and well-presented. The comparison table is particularly valuable for understanding the differences between these testing tools.

      Reply
    • Indeed, Archie. The clear distinction provided in the comparison table enhances the decision-making process for testers and quality assurance professionals.

      Reply
  10. The information provided here about the differences between QTP and WinRunner is very useful. It helps understand the advantages and disadvantages of each tool for functional and regression testing.

    Reply
    • Absolutely, Victoria. The comparison table and the detailed explanation of QTP and WinRunner functionalities are enlightening for testers and developers.

      Reply
    • I agree with you, Victoria. It’s important to have a clear understanding of the capabilities and limitations of these testing tools.

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Want to save this article for later? Click the heart in the bottom right corner to save to your own articles box!