An amphetamine stimulant, Vyvanse, is a drug used to treat ADHD. Concerta is also a sort of medication or prescription that is administered to people who have ADHD.
Methylphenidate is the generic name for Concerta. Lisdexamfetamine, the generic name for Vyvanse, is a widespread medication.
Key Takeaways
- Vyvanse contains lisdexamfetamine, while Concerta contains methylphenidate; both treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
- Vyvanse offers a longer duration of action than Concerta, providing consistent symptom relief throughout the day.
- Concerta has a faster onset of action than Vyvanse, offering quicker symptom relief but potentially more frequent dosing.
Vyvanse vs Concerta
The difference between Vyvanse and Concerta is that Vyvanse is an amphetamine stimulant used to treat ADHD. Because Vyvanse includes amphetamine, it is only administered to ADHD patients at the lowest dose of 30 mg. Concerta is a type of ADHD medicine. This substance, however, is a non-amphetamine stimulant. There is no amphetamine in Concerta. As a result, for patients with ADHD, roughly 54 mg is sufficient.
Vyvanse takes about two hours to affect a person’s physique. Furthermore, it is given to the person at breakfast to show the drug’s effect throughout the day.
The adverse effects of Vyvanse in children include a sudden spike in blood pressure after around five hours. In this scenario, the parent should seek medical attention quickly. Vyvanse is commonly sold as chewable pills or capsules.
Concerta’s effect is seen after only 30 minutes. However, the drug’s effect might be visible in the body for up to 10 hours.
The rebound impact of ADHD symptoms, which worsens the child’s health, is one of the adverse effects that can be noted while taking Concerta. Personality changes are some of the other adverse effects that have been observed.
Concerta is referred to as methylphenidate in its generic form.
Comparison Table
| Parameters of Comparison | Vyvanse | Concerta |
|---|---|---|
| Generic name | Lisdexamfetamine | Methylphenidate |
| Effect time | Two hours | Thirty minutes |
| Treatment time | Four months | Seven weeks |
| Dosage | 30 mg | 54 mg |
| Side effects | Blood pressure | Personality changes |
What is Vyvanse?
Lisdexamfetamine, the generic name for Vyvanse, is a prevalent drug. Chewable pills and capsules are the most common Vyvanse on the market.
When diagnosed with Vyvanse, the therapy for ADHD can be completed in four months if they are regularly watched.
Vyvanse, an amphetamine stimulant, is a type of medicine used to treat ADHD. Because Vyvanse contains amphetamine, it is only prescribed to ADHD patients at the lowest dose, 30 mg.
Vyvanse takes two hours for its effects to manifest in the body.
Furthermore, it is administered to the person at breakfast so that the drug’s effect can be witnessed throughout the day.
The adverse effects that might be seen in a child prescribed Vyvanse include an abrupt spike in blood pressure after about five hours. In this scenario, the parent should seek medical help quickly.
What is Concerta?
Concerta’s effect is visible in about 30 minutes. On the other hand, the drug’s effect can be seen in the person’s body for up to 10 hours.
The rebound impact of all ADHD symptoms, which worsens the child’s health, is one of the adverse effects that can be noted while taking Concerta.
Concerta is a sort of medication or treatment that is administered to people who have attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
This substance, on the other hand, is a non-amphetamine stimulant. Concerta is free of amphetamines. As a result, 54 mg is sufficient for persons who have ADHD.
The treatment of ADHD can be completed in as little as seven weeks with the help of Concerta. Personality changes are some of the additional adverse effects that can be observed.
Concerta is commonly referred to as methylphenidate in its generic form. Concerta is available in the form of ERT (extended-release tablet).
Main Differences Between Vyvanse and Concerta
- Vyvanse is a type of medication that is used in the cure of ADHD, which is an amphetamine stimulant. On the other hand, Concerta is a particular type of drug or medication that is given to patients affected with ADHD. However, this drug is a stimulant that is non-amphetamine in nature.
- Because Vyvanse contains amphetamine, it is given to ADHD patients with the lowest dose, which is 30 mg only. On the other hand, Concerta does not contain amphetamine. Therefore, around 54 mg is enough for the patients affected with ADHD.
- Vyvanse takes around two hours to show its effect on the person’s body. Moreover, it is given to the person at the time of breakfast so that the effect of the drug can be seen throughout the day. On the other hand, Concerta takes only around 30 minutes to show its effect. However, the drug’s effect can be seen in the person’s body for around 10 hours.
- The side effect that can be observed in a kid diagnosed with Vyvanse is that after around five hours sudden rise in blood pressure can be witnessed. In this case, the parent must contact the doctor immediately. On the other hand, the side effects observed while taking Concerta are the rebound effect of all the ADHD symptoms, which further worsens the child’s health. Some other side effects can be witnessed in the form of personality changes.
- Vyvanse is highly popular by its generic terminology, which is Lisdexamfetamine. On the other hand, the generic terminology by which Concerta is highly popular is methylphenidate.
- Vyvanse is found in the market as chewable tablets and capsules. On the other hand, Concerta is found in the form of ERT or an extended form of release tablets.
- The treatment of ADHD can be done in four months when they are closely monitored while diagnosed with Vyvanse. On the other hand, with the help of Concerta, the treatment of ADHD can be cured within seven weeks.
- https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1087054713493321
- https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1087054712468486
Last Updated : 13 July, 2023
I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️
Sandeep Bhandari holds a Bachelor of Engineering in Computers from Thapar University (2006). He has 20 years of experience in the technology field. He has a keen interest in various technical fields, including database systems, computer networks, and programming. You can read more about him on his bio page.
There is no evidence in the article to support the thesis. The conclusions are drawn without proper backing. A more rigorous research approach must be used to write an article of this stature.
That’s a good point. A well-researched article would benefit from the backup of reliable sources.
There is a lot of information about these medications online, and the author does not provide citations in the article. It leaves doubt in the reader’s mind.
The medical part of the article is great. The general language is a bit too formal. This could be a bit boring for the average reader
There is always space to improve the way we communicate medical information to the public. This article could be an excellent opportunity to test a common sense approach to convey intricate medical concepts.
I agree. Using more accessible language could considerably broaden the range of readers who could benefit from this article.
It seems like the author is leaning towards Vyvanse, given the positive aspects presented in the article. Everybody should be cautious of the potential bias.
A very informative article. The comparison between Vyvanse and Concerta is clearly explained. However, the author’s stance about these medications is unclear. What is the writer’s point of view?
The author seems to be neutral. The article’s focus is providing information to make the right choice on the medication, which is great. However, it is essential to have a clear point of view about the topic.
I think the author’s viewpoint is that the article is meant to elucidate the drawing line between these two medications. Also, it appears that the author is in favor of these drugs being prescribed carefully to patients. It is a balanced view.
The adverse effects of both medications are well explained. It is important to share information about their negative impact, but the article could be more complete if it also provided some insight into the positive side.