Microsoft Defender ATP or Endpoint and CrowdStrike are two antidotes of cyberattacks. They work as a protection solution and detector of threats and viruses. CrowdStrike is an antivirus solution.
The right solution for an organisation depends on different preferences and requirements. The right protection against cyberattacks can be decided by observing the distinctions between the two and how they are compatible with different customers.
Key Takeaways
- Microsoft Defender ATP is an endpoint protection platform developed by Microsoft, while CrowdStrike is a cybersecurity company offering the Falcon endpoint protection platform.
- Defender ATP integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft products, while CrowdStrike provides a cloud-native, platform-agnostic solution.
- Both products offer threat detection, response, and prevention, but CrowdStrike focuses on advanced persistent threats and zero-day exploits.
Microsoft Defender ATP vs CrowdStrike
Microsoft Defender ATP is Microsoft’s security solution that helps detect, investigate, and respond to advanced threats on networks. CrowdStrike is a cloud-based endpoint security solution that provides threat intelligence and response capabilities to protect organizations from cyberattacks.
Microsoft Defender ATP efficiently analyzes vulnerabilities. You can schedule its patch management function to run automatically. It sends you notifications whenever the risk is detected.
It is capable of assessing collected data to look for impending threats. Network-based attacks and attackers can come under the radar of the threat detection process run by Microsoft Defender ATP.
CrowdStrike is a user-friendly cyberattack solution. It alerts the user when the virus is detected and blocks the threat. It is also affordable and small businesses can utilise this to protect themselves from cyberattacks.
This solution conducts four layers of production. At times the report can get false.
Comparison Table
| Parameters of Comparison | Microsoft Defender ATP | CrowdStrike |
|---|---|---|
| Ability | It is able to detect and stop attacks that are network-based. | It is only able to send alerts when threats are detected. |
| Purpose | Microsoft Defender ATP works for preventing vulnerabilities and ensures zero-day attacks. | CrowdStrike is equipped with features that block threats. |
| Price | MS Defender ATP has a higher price than other solution products. | The cost of CrowdStrike is lesser and also can get reduced. |
| Best fit for | Established organisations are the best-suited customers for it. | For start-ups and organisations with low revenue, it fits perfectly. |
| Operating system | It works best in Microsoft products. | It does not work well in legacy OS. |
What is Microsoft Defender ATP?
Microsoft Defender ATP is at present known as Endpoint. It is a protection for the network level, and it works against upgraded dangerous threats.
Microsoft Defender ATP’s work method is quite simple. It collects data and runs a behavioural analysis on the data from private or public cloud models.
Microsoft hunter has developed this solution named Microsoft Defender ATP. Microsoft partners implant the security teams.
It offers tools to detect attackers. It can also recognise different strategies and methods undertaken by various attackers.
It is competent to scan the data it collects. Any suspicious threat comes under the surveillance of Microsoft Defender ATP.
It evaluates vulnerabilities. This solution can run patch management efficiently, automatically and easily. You can schedule this function. You will get notifications when a risk is detected.
It also sends an alert when username or password is wrong during a sign-in.
This solution costs a fortune, and associations with insufficient revenues can not be capable of affording it. Its best performance skill gets slower if it works during the incoming emails.
This product exclusively works and gets compatible with the products of Microsoft.
What is CrowdStrike?
CrowdStrike uses Falcon Prevent in order to protect devices against viruses and various cyberattacks. With the help of this Falcon, one can see clearly all the threats.
All its attributes can successfully monitor advanced threats. CrowdStrike uses artificial intelligence algorithms and machine learning to detect these advanced threats.
This solution is cloud-based. And also, the data gets collected through the cloud agents. It is competent in being installed on various operating systems such as Windows, Mac, and Linux. This solution is completed in four protection layers.
The first step is an antivirus and ends by protecting each and every endpoint. The process of installation is very easy, as well as its configuration.
The interface is interactive and thus understandable, which makes it easy for the user. For small companies, this solution is adequate for its affordability. It also works very efficiently in an integrated environment.
CrowdStrike attains some disadvantages as well. It takes a longer time than other solutions to scan the subjected assets. Its after-sales support is also known to be not up to the mark. Reports state that the rate of false-positive is higher than the rest.
Main Differences Between Microsoft Defender ATP and CrowdStrike
- Microsoft Defender ATP is able to detect and stop attacks that are network-based. And CrowdStrike is only able to send alerts when threats are detected.
- MS Defender ATP costs more than other solution products, whereas CrowdStrike is lesser in expense.
- Microsoft Defender ATP works best in Microsoft products; however, CrowdStrike does not work well in legacy OS.
- Lucrative businesses and organisations can afford to use Microsoft Defender ATP, but CrowdStrike is affordable for small businesses and start-ups too.
- Microsoft Defender ATP prevents vulnerabilities while, on the other hand, CrowdStrike blocks threats.
I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️
It’s important to highlight that Microsoft Defender ATP works best with Microsoft products, while CrowdStrike does not work well with legacy OS. Also, Microsoft Defender ATP is designed to prevent vulnerabilities, while CrowdStrike focuses on blocking threats.
Both Microsoft Defender ATP and CrowdStrike solutions provide various features useful against potential threats. While Microsoft Defender ATP is more expensive and recommended for established organizations, CrowdStrike is more affordable and better suited for smaller businesses.
The in-depth analysis of Microsoft Defender ATP and CrowdStrike offers a comprehensive understanding of the capabilities and limitations of each solution in addressing cybersecurity challenges.
The detailed comparison of Microsoft Defender ATP and CrowdStrike helps businesses make informed decisions about the best cybersecurity solution for their specific organizational requirements.
Microsoft Defender ATP and CrowdStrike both play crucial roles in providing a protective shield against cyberattacks. Their functionalities, pricing, and compatibility are some of the factors that organizations need to consider when choosing the right solution for their cybersecurity needs.
Microsoft Defender ATP efficiently analyzes vulnerabilities and provides automatic patch management. On the other hand, CrowdStrike’s user-friendly solution and affordability make it a better choice for small businesses.
The aspect of cost-effectiveness and compatibility with different organizational sizes is a key factor in determining whether Microsoft Defender ATP or CrowdStrike is the suitable choice for cybersecurity protection.
The key takeaways from the comparison between Microsoft Defender ATP and CrowdStrike provide valuable insights into the functionalities, features, and suitability of each solution for different business environments.