Difference Between Acuvue Advance and Oasys (With Table)

The Acuvue Advance and Oasys both are the contact lens. They were introduced in the market as an aesthetic product. Yet, they are also used in therapeutics or when a person wants to change its eye colour. The people with visual dysfunction were asked to wear contact lenses in case of eyeglasses.

The contact lens gave the users comfort in case of dry eyes as they contain eye gel. It makes eyes moist and fresh under certain conditions.

Acuvue Advance vs Oasys

The difference between the Acuvue Advance and Oasys is that Acuvue Advance is an old product with a water content of about 47%, whereas Acuvue Oasys has recently come into the market and has a water content of about 38%, along with the feature that a person can wear it for six consecutive days and nights.

Acuvue Advance was introduced in 2003. They are the weekly disposable contact lenses that protect the eyes against dryness and irritation. The lens is made of silicone hydrogel material called galyfilcon A, which allows 97% of oxygen to pass through the eyes.

Acuvue Oasys entered the market later in 2005. The lens is made up of Senofilcon A, a silicone hydrogel. They are the hydra clear plus lenses that give the same comfort in every season. They are curved lenses which makes them recognizable. They also protect against UVB and UVA.

Comparison Table Between Acuvue Advance and Oasys

Parameters of ComparisonAcuvue AdvanceAcuvue Oasys
Lens MaterialGalyfilcon ASilicon Hydrogel called Senofilcon-A
Water Content 47%38%
Oxygen Permeability86%98%
Available Powers-12.00 to +8.00-0.50D to +8.00D and
Plano lens are available for therapeutic use
Base Curves8.3 mm; 8.7mm8.4mm, 8.8mm
Recommended replacement scheduleTwo-weekly disposable (based on daily wear)Daily wear: 2-weekly replacement
Extended wear: 1-weekly replacement
 UV-blocking97% UVB, 81% UVA99.9% UVB, 96.1% UVA

What is Acuvue Advance?

Acuvue Advance are the contact lenses that came in 2003 manufactured by Johnson & Johnson. They are well suited for short-sightedness and long-sightedness. They not only provide a perfect vision but are also very comfortable. The lens is made up of galyfilcon A and water. It shows about 86% permeability of oxygen and blocks around 97% of UVB and 81% of UVA.

The lens has a diameter of 14.0mm and base curves of 8.3 mm; 8.7mm. As this lens shows oxygen permeability, they also fall under the category of the breathable lens. The Silicone hydrogel (the material lenses are made of) provides a clear and crisp vision. The power of the lens is -12.00 to +8.00.

A person can wear the Acuvue Advance for two weeks daily, which can be used only during the day and be removed at night. They keep the eyes hydrated and give comfort against dryness. They are more preferable during summer.

What is Acuvue Oasys?

Acuvue Oasys is the contact lenses that came in 2005 manufactured by Johnson & Johnson. They are well suited for therapeutic uses. They are curved lens which makes them easily distinguishable while removing. The lens is well known for its hydrating property.

The lens material makes it comfortable in every season. Therefore, the features and comfort are not compromised. The diameter of the lens is 14.0mm, and base curves are 8.4mm, 8.8mm. The power of the lens is 0.50D to +8.00D, and the Plano lens is available for therapeutic use.

The lens is made up of Senofilcon A and water. It shows about 98% permeability of oxygen in open eyes and 96% when eyes are closed. It blocks around 99% of UVB and 96.1% of UVA. They can be worn for six consecutive days and nights, whereas they can go for two weeks if worn on a daily basis.

Main Differences Between Acuvue Advance and Oasys

  1. The Acuvue Advance hit the market in 2003. In contrast to that, Oasys came after two years in 2005.
  2. The Acuvue Advance is made up of Galyfilcon A and Oasys of Senofilcon A.
  3. The water content in Acuvue Advance is 47%. In comparison to that, the Acuvue Oasys has 38%.
  4. The Oxygen permeability of Acuvue Advance is 86%. In contrast to that, Acuvue Oasys has 98%.
  5. The Acuvue Advance blocks 97% UVB, 81% UVA, and Acuvue Oasys has 99.9% UVB, 96.1% UVA blocking power.
  6. The powers available in Acuvue Advance is -12.00 to +8.00, and Acuvue Oasys provide power in -0.50D to +8.00D along with Plano lens therapeutic uses.
  7. The base curve of 8.3 mm; 8.7mm and 8.4mm, 8.8mm is present in Acuvue Advance and Oasys, respectively.
  8. The recommended replacement schedule of Acuvue Advance is after two weeks on a daily basis, whereas Oasys has Daily worn of two-week replacement and Extended wears of one-week replacement
  9. The Oasys is curved lenses which make them easily distinguishable as compared to Acuvue Advance.

Conclusion

Acuvue Advance came in 2003 and was used by people for a longer time. The product was loved and preferred by the people. The reason was, the Acuvue Advance was comfortable and didn’t cause dryness and irritation in the eyes like other contact lenses in the market. The lens helped in correcting the eyesight and also protected the eye from Uv Radiation.

The Acuvue Advance had a hydrating property which made it more popular because some people weren’t interested in buying the eye drops every time they suffered from dryness and itchiness in the eyes; therefore, they preferred the Acuvue Advance contact lenses.

Acuvue Oasys was launched by Johnson & Johnson in 2005. The product was new in the market, and hence, fewer reviews were about the product. Yet, when the product came into the market and people started using it. They started recognizing its properties.

The contact lens Acuvue Oasys had less water content as compared to the Acuvue Advance. Then also, the contact lenses came with increased oxygen permeability and UV radiation blocking. They were also useful in the therapeutic area. It came along with a visibility tint that was not in the Acuvue Advance.

References

  1. https://journals.lww.com/claojournal/Abstract/2007/05000/Quantity_and_Conformation_of_Lysozyme_Deposited_on.5.aspx
  2. https://journals.lww.com/optvissci/Abstract/2007/04000/Oxygen_Permeability_and_Water_Content_of_Silicone.16.aspx
x
2D vs 3D