AES vs RC4: Difference and Comparison

As we exchange data over the Internet, it is imperative to protect our confidential information. Cryptographic algorithms such as AES and RC4 are used to restore data security.

Cryptologists have developed this effective algorithm that is challenging for a cryptanalyst by combining concepts from mathematics with computer science.

Key Takeaways

  1. Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) is a symmetric encryption algorithm, whereas RC4 is a stream cipher algorithm.
  2. AES is widely adopted and considered more secure due to its block cipher structure and key lengths of 128, 192, or 256 bits.
  3. RC4, although faster, has known vulnerabilities and is no longer recommended for secure communications.

AES vs RC4

The difference between AES and RC4 is that AES is a block cipher, while RC4 is a stream cipher. Block encryption and stream encryption are symmetric algorithm classifications. A block cipher encodes plain text in block sizes, while a stream cipher encodes bit by bit, similar to a stream’s flow.

AES vs RC4

AES, or Advanced Encryption Standard, was started in 1997 by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) with incoming attacks on DES. The best encryption candidate.

Was selected from among fifteen other algorithms entered in an open competition to meet AES specifications. AES incorporates a 128-bit block.

And makes use of 3 specific key lengths: 128, 192, and 256 bits. RC4, or Rivest Cipher 4, was invented by Ron Rivest in 1987.

He developed it for RSA security. It is a symmetric stream cipher that encodes plaintext bit by bit with a key to convert it to ciphertext. Key sizes consist of 64-bit or 128-bit.

Originally, RC4 remained a secret until it was released to the public. Ron’s code is his other name.

Comparison Table

Parameters of comparisonAESRC4
Definition Advanced Encryption Standard is a symmetric block cipher.Rivest Cipher 4 is a symmetric stream cipher.
Origin AES was developed via an open competition in 1997.Ron Rivest developed RC4 in 1987.
Security AES is more secure than RC4.RC4 is not as secure as AES.
Key sizes128, 192, and 256 bits64 or 128 bits
Applications SSL, TSL, etc.NASA, NIST, etc. 

What is AES?

In 1997, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) held an open competition. Cryptologists from different parts of the world were invited to present their algorithms.

Also Read:  Etsy vs eBay: Difference and Comparison

They had to meet the standards set in AES. Each of the algorithms was analyzed to find the most suitable one in 1999, and Rijndael was finally the chosen candidate.

AES is a block cipher that uses a symmetric key. The plain text entered is encoded in block sizes to convert it to ciphertext.

The bit size is limited to 128 bits, and key sizes of 128, 192, and 256 bits are used. Rounding varies depending on the size of the key.

There are 10 rounds for 128 bits, 12 for 192, and 14 for 256 bits. They are called AES128, AES192, and AES256.

The encryption process goes through four steps in each round. The more rounds, the more difficult the encryption code becomes to crack.

A symmetric key is used, which implies a unique key that is implemented by both the user and the recipient.

Some high-security conditions were established by NIST as follows: 

  •  It must be a block cipher using a symmetric key. 
  •  AES must have flexible key lengths. 
  •  AES must be built in such a way that it can be integrated into both hardware and software. 
  •  AES must be defined by the public.

What is RC4?

In 1987, Ron Rivest invented Rivest Cipher 4. He advanced it to steady RSA security.

A one-time pad inspired the initial concept, additionally referred to as the Verman cipher. Like AES, RC4 is also a symmetric algorithm unlike AES, RC4 is a stream cipher.

The encryption of Rivest Cipher 4 was kept secret until the code was released in 1994 in the public domain. RC4 is a stream cipher that is byte-oriented.

Also Read:  Static vs Dynamic Memory Allocation In C: Difference and Comparison

Encrypt the data bit by bit. Contains 64-bit or 128-bit key sizes. The encryption process involves a secret key that runs on the RC4 algorithm to generate the ciphertext.

In RC4, KSA and PRGA generate the keystream. KSA stands for Key Scheduling Algorithm, and PRGA stands for Pseudo-Random Generation Algorithm.

We use a single keystream (XOR) that combines the permutation of 256 probable bytes and a pair of 8-bit index pointers. Likewise, decryption follows a similar XOR pattern.

Various applications of RC4 are 

  • SSL (1995)
  • WEP (1997)
  • TLS (1999)
  • WPA (2003)

Types of Rivest Cipher 4

  • Spritz 
  • RC4A 
  • VMPC
  • RC4A+

The stream ciphers used by RC4 ensure easy implementation and are, therefore, widely used. Unlike AES, RC4 lacks strict security small data streams cannot be encoded by implementing RC4.

Main Differences Between AES and RC4

  1. AES or Advanced Encryption Standard is a block cipher whereas Rivest Cipher 4 is a stream cipher.
  2. As far as security is concerned, AES is more secure than RC4.
  3. AES is developed after RC4, the former was initiated in 1997, and the latter was developed in 1987.
  4. AES uses 128, 192, and 256 bits, whereas RC4 uses 64 bits and 128 bits key size.
  5. AES has a complex algorithm, whereas the encryption in RC4 is relatively simple.
References
  1. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/1258477/
  2. https://asat.journals.ekb.eg/article_23497.html

Last Updated : 11 June, 2023

dot 1
One request?

I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️

17 thoughts on “AES vs RC4: Difference and Comparison”

  1. The stringent security conditions established by NIST for AES are crucial to ensure reliability and integrity. The differentiation between AES and RC4 in terms of their security levels is noteworthy.

    Reply
    • The encryption complexity of AES contrasted with the relative simplicity of the RC4 algorithm highlights the fundamental differences between these two cryptographic methods in terms of their built-in security measures.

      Reply
    • Absolutely, the standards and key lengths of AES and its comparison with RC4 emphasize why AES is widely implemented for secure communications.

      Reply
  2. I have come across many technical articles about encryption standards, but this one is particularly well-structured and informative. The detailed explanation of the encryption process in AES is commendable.

    Reply
    • I agree. The detailed comparison combined with the comprehensive explanation of both AES and RC4 makes this article an excellent reference for understanding these cryptographic algorithms.

      Reply
    • The step-by-step explanation of the encryption process in AES is indeed very thorough and helpful for those who want to understand how it works.

      Reply
  3. Understanding the origin and historical development of AES and RC4 has provided a meaningful context for comprehending the advancements in cryptographic algorithms over the years.

    Reply
  4. The detailed explanation of the encryption process and the algorithmic differences between AES and RC4 provided in this article is truly comprehensive and insightful.

    Reply
  5. The comparison table chart is useful to understand the differences between AES and RC4. It is indeed alarming that RC4 has known vulnerabilities and is no longer recommended for secure communications.

    Reply
    • It is concerning to know about the known vulnerabilities of RC4, especially when we consider the usage of SSL and WEP. Great insights into these encryption standards.

      Reply
  6. The clear distinctions between AES and RC4, coupled with the analysis of their encryption processes, have been presented exceptionally well in this article. A crucial aspect of data security laid out effectively.

    Reply
    • Agreed. The detailed elaboration of the encryption and decryption processes of both AES and RC4 has been elucidated with remarkable clarity and precision.

      Reply
    • The insights provided in this article are indispensable for anyone interested in ensuring secure data communications. An in-depth comparative analysis of these algorithms.

      Reply
  7. I am really glad to have learned all of these details about encryption. Moreover, it’s interesting to know that AES is considered more secure than RC4 due to its key lengths and structure. This could be very useful for security purposes.

    Reply
  8. This article successfully highlights the significance of AES and RC4 encryption algorithms. However, it would have been even more valuable if practical implementation examples were included.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Want to save this article for later? Click the heart in the bottom right corner to save to your own articles box!