A package manager is computer software that deals with packages, installs, updates, and upgrades necessary packages while archiving the rest. So what do Yum and RPM have to do with this?
Yum and RPM are both package managers for Linux systems. They are used based on the Linux distribution and your individual needs.
Key Takeaways
- YUM is a package management tool for Linux distributions based on RPM that automates software installation, updates, and dependency resolution.
- RPM is a package management system that installs, updates, and removes software packages in Linux distributions like Red Hat, CentOS, and Fedora.
- YUM and RPM manage software on Linux systems, but YUM simplifies the process by automatically handling dependencies and updates.
Yum vs. RPM
RPM is a command-line utility that installs, updates and manages software packages in Red Hat-based systems. It uses a package format with the extension .rpm and maintains a database of installed packages. YUM is a command-line utility used to manage packages in Red Hat-based systems.
They are packaging managers for RPM-based Linux systems. They are high-level front-end management package managers for Linux distributions that are RPM-based.
RPM stands for Redhat Packaging Manager. It can be considered one of the oldest packaging managers that do basic functions like uninstalling, updating, and archiving the packages received by the Linux systems.
Comparison Table
Parameters of Comparison | Yum | RPM |
---|---|---|
Definition | It is a top-level and front end packet management that can do everything individually. | It is a low-level packet manager that does the most basic things. |
Origin | It was updated from YUP to Yum in 2003. | The origin dates back to 1997. |
Dependency | It resolves and installs dependencies automatically. | Does not resolve dependencies. |
Installing of package | You can only install packages available in the repository, which shows already installed packages. | It allows you to install multiple packages but must provide the exact file name. |
Upgrading | Automatic upgrades are done to the latest version. | Does not allow upgradation. |
Management | It is a tool that can be used to manage RPM with ease. | It isn’t easy to manage when it comes to installing/ upgrading packages. |
What is Yum?
Yum, which stands for Yellowdog Upgrader Modified, is the modified or updated version of YUP or Yellowdog UPgrader and came in 2003. It is dependent on RPM.
It mainly functions on RPM-based Linux systems and depends on RPM for its function. It is also used for managing, installing, and upgrading the packages in RPM-based Linux systems.
It can sense and resolve dependencies. Although it cannot install multiple packages like RPM, it can install the already available packages in the repository.
Yum can also scan and upgrade the packages to the latest versions. It also entirely relies on online repositories.
What is RPM?
RPM stands for Redhat Packaging Manager and was developed in 1997. It is a modified version of the package managers with the .pm extension in 1993.
It is a free, open-source package management system that works on Linux distribution systems and performs the basic functions of installing, uninstalling, scanning, upgrading, updating, etc.
RPM-based Linux systems need Yum for their management as it cannot sense and resolve dependencies independently. This would make it easier for the package manager to locate the file.
RPM does not depend on online repositories for its services and cannot scan or upgrade itself or its packages to the latest versions.
Main Difference between YUM and RPM
- Although Yum and RPM are Linux system packaging managers, they are still different, even in their meaning. While Yum is a top-level front-end packaging manager that operates on RPM-based Linux systems, RPM is a low-level packaging manager that performs basic functions.
- YUP, or Yellowdog UPgrader, was first made and completely developed between 1999-2000. The updated version of YUP is known as Yum, which was redeveloped or modified in 2003. At the same time, RPM or Redhat was developed in 1997.
Last Updated : 11 June, 2023
Sandeep Bhandari holds a Bachelor of Engineering in Computers from Thapar University (2006). He has 20 years of experience in the technology field. He has a keen interest in various technical fields, including database systems, computer networks, and programming. You can read more about him on his bio page.
The post effectively lays out the distinctions between Yum and RPM’s features and functionalities.
I agree, the post offers a comprehensive analysis of the two package management tools.
Very informative explanation about what Yum and RPM are and what they do in a Linux system. It makes it easy to understand for those who are not familiar with package managers.
I agree, the post provides a comprehensive understanding of Yum and RPM.
The historical context and evolution of Yum and RPM give a comprehensive view of their roles in Linux systems.
Understanding their historical development is essential in grasping their functionalities.
Agreed, their evolution helps clarify their current usage and differences.
The comparison table clearly outlines the differences between Yum and RPM in a concise manner.
I’m not sure if I’d completely agree with everything. I think RPM can be more user-friendly, even if it’s more low-level.
Interesting perspective. RPM indeed offers a different user experience compared to Yum.
I think RPM’s approach to package management is more straightforward.
It’s clear that Yum’s dependency handling capabilities offer an advantage over RPM.
Agreed, the ability to resolve dependencies is a crucial aspect within package management.
Absolutely, Yum’s automatic dependency resolution simplifies the software management process.
The detailed explanation of Yum and RPM’s functions provides a solid foundation for comparison.
Definitely, it forms a basis for an in-depth understanding.
The comparison between Yum and RPM’s management capabilities is enlightening.
Indeed, it shows a clear distinction in their approaches to package management.
While Yum and RPM serve similar purposes, the updated information about their history and differences is insightful.
True, these details provide a broader context for evaluation.
Indeed, understanding the origin and evolution of these package managers adds depth to the article.
The detailed analysis of Yum and RPM’s differences enhances understanding of their roles in Linux systems.
Absolutely, it provides a thorough comparison between the two package managers.