The servers and modules all over the world are exceeding in terms of quality as well as competition. Similarly, the two famous computer Multinationals have their servers, Dell’s FX2 and HP’s Apollo.
Key Takeaways
- Dell FX2 is a modular 2U converged infrastructure platform, enabling flexible resource allocation and scalability, while HP Apollo is a dense server solution focusing on high-performance computing and energy efficiency.
- Dell FX2 supports various compute and storage sledges, allowing customization based on specific needs, whereas HP Apollo offers optimized configurations for specific workloads, like data analytics or high-performance computing.
- Dell FX2 and HP Apollo provide management tools, but Dell’s OpenManage simplifies server management and monitoring, while HP’s Integrated Lights-Out (iLO) offers remote server management.
Dell FX2 vs HP Apollo
Dell FX2 is a modular server system offering high-density computing with a small footprint and advanced management features, such as Dell’s OpenManage Enterprise console. HP Apollo is a high-performance computing (HPC) system that provides massively parallel processing capabilities.
It is launched and manufactured solely by Dell and rivals the HPE servers in terms of price-to-feature ratio.
Apollo offers double the density of traditional 1U VPS hosting, allowing for more accessible data centre floor space, and improved performance while decreasing energy usage and customizable configurations that fit within industry norm racks.
Comparison Table
| Parameters of Comparison | Dell FX2 | HP Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Company | The Dell FX2 or the PowerEdge FX2 was launched by Dell Computers and hosts the FX architectural frame. | The Apollo Class 2000 and others are a part of Hewlett and Packards Enterprises also known as the HPE Apollo. |
| Launch Date | The FX2 was launched for sale in December 2014, together with the FC630 and FM120x4 processor units. | The Apollo Gen 9 was launched in the year 2017. |
| Architecture | The Dell FX2 enclosure, also known as the Poweredge FX2 compartment, is a very tiny modular framework for the PowerEdge FX architectural frame, an incredibly streamlined and effective platform for constructing an IT network. | The Apollo System provides a dense configuration in a typical 2U chassis featuring up to four HPE ProLiant XL170r Generation 9 server modules. |
| Costing | The Dell FX2 is cheaper than the HPE Apollo. | The HP Apollo is costly but it justifies its cost to feature ratio. |
| Efficiency and Utility Domain | Used in offices and laboratories for moderate usage niche and is quite efficient for these purposes. | The HPE Apollo elevated system range is designed for maximum performance and efficiency. It is utilised and operated by large corporations and businesses. |
What is Dell FX2?
The FX2 platform, at its core, blends the compactness and efficiency of blades with the convenience and cost savings of rack-based platforms. Create computing, storage, and connectivity configuration that suits your specific requirements.
Dell used to be more inexpensive, but the price disparities are considerably less pronounced nowadays.
The following are some of the perks and characteristics of the Dell FX2:
- A unique, one-of-a-kind compact modular design accommodates IT resource building blocks of varied sizes for more flexibility.
- Manages to combine blade density and effectiveness with rack server economic advantages.
Through assured confidence and offering worry-free, safe systems, it employs packages that examine every element of system security, from design to decommissioning.
What is HP Apollo?
The HP Apollo strong and high-efficiency server range is designed for maximum productivity and effectiveness.
The HP Apollo series offers a dense, greater performance orientation, tiered solution for organizations of all sizes, with liquid cooling that is 1,000x more powerful than air and “right-sized scalability” with 2X the computing density for the workforce and private cloud applications.
Take a look at the Apollo’s, one of the most successful modules; inside an Apollo 6000 System, you can run up to 20 hot-swap 2 x 1P workstations or 160 in a conventional 48U rack with rear wiring for cold storage workability.
An auxiliary power shelf fuels rack-scale power management, with simple Auxiliary Power Administration for the rack, chassis, servers, and constituent managerial level.
Main Differences Between Dell FX2 and HP Apollo
- Dell FX2 is very user-friendly and easy to set up, whereas the HP Apollo is aimed at professionals and is pretty complicated to set up.
- Dell FX2 was launched in December 2014, whereas the Apollo by HP was launched in 2017.
- https://i.dell.com/sites/doccontent/business/smb/merchandizing/en/Documents/PowerEdge_FX2_Spec_Sheet.pdf
- https://cdn.cnetcontent.com/syndication/feeds/hp-ent/inline-content/TN/B/F/BF2F433787A1E121394338A20B7B73BBE928FB56_source.PDF
Last Updated : 21 June, 2023
I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️
Sandeep Bhandari holds a Bachelor of Engineering in Computers from Thapar University (2006). He has 20 years of experience in the technology field. He has a keen interest in various technical fields, including database systems, computer networks, and programming. You can read more about him on his bio page.
The detailed comparison of the Dell FX2 and HP Apollo servers is excellent. I have a clearer understanding of both systems after reading this post.
The comprehensive analysis of the Dell FX2 and HP Apollo servers is incredibly informative. It is extremely helpful, especially for a layperson like me. I will definitely refer to it before investing in a server.
This article offers a critical analysis of Dell FX2 and HP Apollo servers which provides valuable insights to anyone intending to purchase a server.
Although the post has well-structured information, I find it to be somewhat biased towards Dell FX2. The analysis appears to present the Dell FX2 more favorably than HP Apollo.
The information presented in this article is comprehensive and brilliantly articulated. It has certainly expanded my knowledge of server systems.
The post, having provided informative details, subtly directs readers to favor Dell FX2. A touch of bias is discernible.