Equal vs Splenda: Difference and Comparison

In the present day, people have a different lifestyle from that in the old days. The problems, such as diabetes, obesity, and other diseases linked to these two, are wreaking havoc in each household.

At present, almost thirteen (13) percent of people globally are suffering from obesity. And nearly ten percent are diabetic. So the new term ‘artificial sweetener’ is also getting equally popular.

It is the replacement of sugar which diabetic people can take without getting worried about insulin shots later. 

Key Takeaways

  1. Equal is an artificial sweetener containing aspartame, while Splenda is made from sucralose.
  2. Splenda tends to be sweeter and more heat-stable than Equal, making it better suited for cooking and baking.
  3. Both sweeteners offer a low-calorie alternative to sugar, but individuals may have different preferences in taste and texture.

Equal vs Splenda

The difference between Equal and Splenda can be many. These are two different artificial sweeteners. Though their task is the same, they differ in composition, taste, and usage. Equal, which was created in 1980, became a famous substitute for sugar. However, much later came Splenda, which contains sucralose. Also, its reaction to heat and calorific contents are other parameters of differentiation. 

Equal vs Splenda

Equal is a famous substitute for sugar. At present, when diabetes and obesity have become quite a social scene, artificial sweeteners have been a saviour. Equal is a known artificial sweetening substance that contains Aspartame.

Aspartame has a sweetness almost 200 times sweeter than sugar (sucrose). Also, this compound isn’t heat resistant. Also, dextrose and maltodextrin are other components that are present in Equal. 

Splenda has a similar function to that of equality. The use of Splenda is to induce artificial sweetness into our food.

Diabetic people are the ones who mostly use it. Splenda can be said to be another name for sucralose.

Also Read:  Argan Oil vs Coconut Oil: Difference and Comparison

We can say it is a compound that acts much similar to sugar. It contains Sucralose in its composition.

Sucralose is a component that needs to be taken in small amounts to be safer. This component makes Splenda heat resistant, and we can use it in baking and cooking.

It is effective at present. 

Comparison Table

Parameters of Comparison EqualSplenda
CompositionIt contains aspartame, dextrose, and maltodextrin as sweetening components.It contains sucralose as a sweetening component.
CaloriesIt contains more calories than Splenda.It contains very few calories.
Taste after heatingAfter heating, it turns bitter and gives off a weird aftertaste.After heating it doesn’t undergo any change and taste is constant.
UsesIt is used in tea, coffee, cold drinks, ice creams.It can be used for cooking, baking, and also in beverages.
Side effects of useKnown side effects are dizziness and headache.Knows side effects are weight gain, reduction in helpful bacteria, and migraine.
Pin This Now to Remember It Later
Pin This

What is Equal? 

At present, the world is battling two health conditions which are obesity and weight gain. Sugar, which is present in almost everything, is a reason for this condition. In the year 1965, Aspartame was discovered.

It was branded as an ‘artificial sweetener’, and people were selling it under the name ‘Equal’. 

Equal is the sugar substitute that contains sweetness. It can be said to be 200 times more than sugar. It is the main component of equality. The other two elements, namely maltodextrin and dextrose, are also present in it. 

Equal contains a few more calories than Splenda. One gram of equal has 3.6 calories.

Due to the presence of Aspartame, the Equal is unfit to be used in baking. In case it comes in contact with heat during heating, baking, or cooking.

It leads to some chemical reactions in the Aspartame, present in equal amounts. Because of this, it turns bitter. 

Its uses are limited to tea, coffee, cold beverages, ice creams, etc. The FDA ( Food And Drug Administration ) approved Equal in the year 1981.

Also Read:  Ristretto, Espresso, vs Lungo: Difference and Comparison

Some side effects are known to be associated with it, like a feeling of sleepiness and headache. Equal is sold in the market in both tablet form and also in powdered form.

equal

What is Splenda? 

Splenda has a similar function to that of equality. They were using this to induce artificial sweetness into our food.

Diabetic people are the ones who mostly use it. Splenda contains sucralose, which is the sweetener.

Splenda can be said to be another name for sucralose. The year 1980 was the time when the discovery of sucralose took place.

We can say this year is a revolutionary phase, and the aim was to help the Diabetics and people concerned with weight immensely. 

The calorific content of Splenda is much less than the calorific content of Equal. Splenda can even be said to be a no-calorie substance.

One of the perks of using Splenda is that it can be used in tea, coffee, beverages, ice creams, desserts, and even while cooking and baking. As sucralose behaves very similarly to sugar when heated, its taste remains the same.

There have been many debates as to whether the use of Splenda is safe or not. There have been known side effects.

They are a reduction in the helpful bacteria present in our gut, a condition of migraine, and even in some cases, it was an increase in weight.

The FDA ( Food And Drug Administration) approved it in the year 1991. It is sold both in the form of tablets as well as in the form of powder.

It has now gained popularity, and many people use it. 

splenda

Main Differences Between Equal and Splenda

  1. Equal contains aspartame, dextrins, and maltodextrin as sweeteners. However, Splenda contains sucralose as a sweetening component. 
  2. Equal contains more calories than Splenda. However, Splenda contains fewer calories than Equal. 
  3. Equal changes its taste and turns bitter upon heating. Whereas Splenda doesn’t change its taste upon heating. 
  4. Equal is used in coffee, tea, cold beverages, and ice cream. But Splenda can also be used in cooking and baking. 
  5. Equal intake might cause side effects such as dizziness and headache. However, Splenda shows side effects such as weight gain, a reduction in gut bacteria, and migraines. 
References
  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030439401630859X
  2. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1028415X.1999.11747289

dot 1
One request?

I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️

Sandeep Bhandari
Sandeep Bhandari

Sandeep Bhandari holds a Bachelor of Engineering in Computers from Thapar University (2006). He has 20 years of experience in the technology field. He has a keen interest in various technical fields, including database systems, computer networks, and programming. You can read more about him on his bio page.

23 Comments

  1. The information provided about the composition, uses, and effects of artificial sweeteners like Equal and Splenda is highly instructive. Understanding these details is essential for individuals aiming to adopt health-conscious dietary practices.

    • Your emphasis on the instructive nature of the article’s content is astute. The detailed comparison of the attributes of Equal and Splenda offers valuable insights for individuals wishing to make informed choices about their dietary habits.

  2. The discussion of Equal and Splenda is enlightening, especially in highlighting their composition, calorie content, taste, and side effects. This comprehensive comparison is invaluable for individuals seeking to manage their sugar consumption effectively.

    • Your recognition of the comprehensive nature of the comparison is insightful. The detailed overview of the attributes and effects of Equal and Splenda serves as an educational resource for those focused on their dietary well-being.

  3. The comparison between Equal and Splenda is detailed and informative, providing valuable insights for individuals seeking to understand the distinctions between these sweeteners. The adverse effects mentioned underscore the importance of informed consumption.

    • Your recognition of the value of understanding sweetener attributes is commendable. The article’s emphasis on the differences between Equal and Splenda contributes to greater awareness about healthier sugar alternatives.

    • Your acknowledgement of the informative nature of the article is noteworthy. The discussion of adverse effects associated with Equal and Splenda serves as a reminder for consumers to consider their dietary choices carefully.

  4. The in-depth description of the composition, uses, and side effects of Equal and Splenda is particularly informative. This knowledge enables individuals to make well-informed decisions about incorporating these sweeteners into their dietary practices.

  5. Understanding the components, calories, taste, and uses of artificial sweeteners is essential for individuals managing diabetes or obesity. The article provides a comprehensive comparison of Equal and Splenda, highlighting key differences in their attributes.

    • Your emphasis on the importance of understanding sweetener attributes is crucial. The side effects of Equal and Splenda are significant considerations for individuals using these sweeteners, as well.

  6. It is crucial to understand that the problems of diabetes and obesity are prevalent in society today, and artificial sweeteners like Equal and Splenda can provide a low-calorie alternative to sugar for people suffering from these conditions. The differences in composition, taste, and usage are important to consider when choosing between these sweeteners.

    • Your point about understanding the differences between sweeteners is essential for making informed dietary choices. I appreciate the comparison table provided in the article, which clearly outlines the variations between Equal and Splenda.

    • You’ve highlighted the significance of considering the health benefits of artificial sweeteners. The distinction between Equal and Splenda is vital, especially for usage in different food and beverage categories.

  7. The in-depth explanation of Equal and Splenda is enlightening, especially in terms of their composition, calorie content, and heat stability. These details enable individuals to make informed decisions about incorporating artificial sweeteners into their diets.

    • Your thoughtful assessment of the article’s content is well-stated. The detailed information about the composition and heat stability of sweeteners like Equal and Splenda can aid individuals in making conscious dietary choices.

    • Your insightful comment underscores the importance of informed decision-making. The article’s focus on the differences in composition and heat resistance of Equal and Splenda is beneficial for individuals seeking to manage their sugar intake.

  8. The description of Equal and Splenda, along with their uses and side effects, provides valuable insights into the health considerations associated with artificial sweeteners. It’s essential to have access to such detailed information when making dietary choices.

    • Your recognition of the importance of informed dietary choices is commendable. The article’s emphasis on the distinct uses and side effects of Equal and Splenda serves as an educational resource for consumers.

  9. The information provided about the composition and calorie content of Equal and Splenda is very insightful. This detailed comparison helps in understanding the suitability of these sweeteners for various dietary needs.

    • I agree with your assessment of the detailed comparison. The article effectively discusses the uses and side effects of Equal and Splenda, allowing readers to make informed decisions about their consumption.

  10. The article effectively explains the differences between Equal and Splenda, especially in terms of their composition, calorie content, and effects after heating. These distinctions provide valuable insights for individuals seeking healthier alternatives to sugar.

    • You’ve aptly summarized the key points of comparison between Equal and Splenda. The mention of side effects associated with these sweeteners offers a holistic understanding of their impact on health and well-being.

    • Your comment on the need for healthier sugar alternatives is well-articulated. The comparison table presented in the article is informative, aiding readers in evaluating the suitability of Equal and Splenda for their dietary requirements.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Want to save this article for later? Click the heart in the bottom right corner to save to your own articles box!