It is a very famous proverb that words are mightier than the sword. This saying simply denotes the idea that words can influence the entire mass of people and can make them do anything or everything that the speaker wishes them to do if the words are conveyed in the right manner.
Rhetoric and dialectic are two types of manner of speech that are used widely all across the world, and it can be very confusing to differentiate between these two as they happen to be very similar to one another.
Rhetoric vs Dialectic
The difference between Rhetoric and Dialectic is that the former represents an art of expressing the thoughts of a person by way of one-way communication only. But on the other hand, the latter represents another form of expression in which two-way communication is used to express one’s thoughts more clearly.
Want to save this article for later? Click the heart in the bottom right corner to save to your own articles box!
Our communication is called to be rhetoric when it takes place between the speaker and the audience, and there is a negligible amount of interaction between these two fraternities.
The person who happens to convey his thoughts keeps on speaking and tries to persuade the people who are listening to him by way of his speaking skills only.
Better communication is called to be dialectic when there is a dialogue between the speaker and the listener, and there is an active interaction between the two fraternities in which the speaker tries to convey his own thoughts or beliefs by way of communication from both sides.
Comparison Table
| Parameters of Comparison | Rhetoric | Dialectic |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning | The term refers to a form of one-way communication. | The term refers to a form of two-way communication. |
| Nature of communication | It is a unilateral process and only one person happens to be the center of the communication. | It is a bilateral process in which both parties find equal participation. |
| Uses | Heavy words are used to persuade the audience | Logical arguments are used to persuade the listeners. |
| Usually delivered at | It is used in places where large gatherings are being addressed. | It is used in places where there are few people to communicate with. |
| Presence of arguments | In this form of speech, argumentative skills are not used. | In this form of speech, argumentative skills are used. |
| Involves | Speaker only happens to be involved in the process of communication. | It involves the speaker as well as the listener. |
What is Rhetoric?
The term rhetoric in itself has been explained in multiple dictionaries and word banks as the art of persuading someone, especially a human being.
In other words, when a person communicates with some other persons through a unilateral process only and communicates his own beliefs and thoughts without giving a chance to the audience to interact with that person, it is called that the person is using the rhetoric form of speech.
This process is called unilateral because it does not involve interaction with the people to whom the communication is being addressed, and the speaker happens to be the main center of the communication.
The speaker uses heavy words to persuade the audience to believe whatever he is saying about any particular topic.
This form of speech is most visibly used in places very large gatherings are addressed by the speakers because in such cases, there is very little scope for allowing interaction between the speaker and the audience.
It can be said that this communication happens to be a sort of closed web in which only the speaker happens to be the key player.
What is Dialectic?
The term dialectic originates from the term dialogue in itself end.
The very basic fundamental principle of this form of communication happens to be the interaction that takes place between the person who is communicating and the person to whom the communication is being done.
In simple words, it is said that a person is using a dialectic form of communication when he expresses his views to the audience and allows the audience to question him to develop a better understanding of the subject.
It is a bilateral process and gives the opportunity to the audience to participate in the entire mechanism of communication. In this communication, no heavy words or motivational things are used to persuade the audience.
Rather the speaker tries to get into the minds of the audience and asks them to ask further questions to him so that he can develop a better report with the audience.
This communication is mostly seen in places where the mass of audience happens to be of very fewer people.
Main Differences Between Rhetoric and Dialectic
- In Rhetoric, one-way communication is used, while on the other hand, in Dialectic, two-way communication is used.
- In Rhetoric, heavy words are used to persuade the audience, while on the other hand, in Dialectic, logical reasoning is used.
- In Rhetoric, the only speaker is allowed to express his thoughts, while on the other hand, in Dialectic, both the speaker and listener can express their views.
- In Rhetoric, argumentative skills are not used, while on the other hand, in Dialectic, argumentative skills are used.
- Rhetoric is used where a large gathering needs to be addressed, while on the other hand, Dialectic is used when there are few people to communicate with.
I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️
Emma Smith holds an MA degree in English from Irvine Valley College. She has been a Journalist since 2002, writing articles on the English language, Sports, and Law. Read more about me on her bio page.
