Cisco Firepower vs Fortinet: Difference and Comparison

A firewall is the basis of the network security of any organization. The job of any firewall is to build a security boundary between the networks and analyze internal and external traffic.

The two dominant companies in the security domain are Cisco and Fortinet. Both companies offer different features in their products.

Key Takeaways

  1. Cisco Firepower is a network security platform that provides intrusion prevention, URL filtering, and other security features. At the same time, Fortinet is a unified threat management system with a firewall, VPN, antivirus, and other security features.
  2. Cisco Firepower uses a next-generation firewall (NGFW) architecture, which allows it to analyze traffic at the application level, while Fortinet uses a traditional firewall architecture.
  3. Cisco Firepower is more suitable for large enterprise networks, while Fortinet is more suitable for small to medium-sized businesses.

Cisco Firepower vs Fortinet

The difference between Cisco Firepower and Fortinet is that Cisco Firepower offers consistent security policies and visibility and has a flexible approach, while Fortinet offers scalable performance in next-generation firewalls and can address the latest threats and trends.

Cisco Firepower vs Fortinet

Cisco firepower provides a good connection in Site-to-Site VPN.

It provides a detailed track of all the active and inactive users on the site and helps in understanding the traffic of the site by analysts. It has higher pricing.

On the other hand, Fortinet is available with a 100+ Gbps interface and over 1 Tbps. It has an affordable pricing rate and is cost-effective.

Fortinet has a FortiGate series and can meet the requirements of the present threats. It can address IPS signature matching, SSL key exchange, and Suite B cryptography without any penalty for performance.

It has the potential to stop around 35,000 malicious files per minute.

Comparison Table

Parameters of ComparisonCisco FirepowerFortinet
Founder Martin RoeschKen Xie and Michael Xie
Year of establishment In the year 2001 In the year 2000
FeaturesThe most valuable features in Cisco firepower are AMP and next-gen features like intrusion protection and application awareness. The most valuable features in Fortinet are advanced routings like RIP, PBR, BGP, and OSPF and easy integration into larger networks.
AdvantagesA simple user interface gives detailed track of active as well as inactive users. It has high visibility and easy communication among the connected devices in the network.It has virtual firewalls, can detect zero-day vulnerabilities, and has SSL-VPN and VDOMs (Virtual Domains)
DisadvantagesPerformance and recovery can be improved as it affects the CPU, and the downtime is long. The content checking is done in a field processing manner, and that causes a delay in the network. Improvement on the restriction of users with allocated quota, the user interface is complex and confusing, and it does not have CASB and Zero trust solution.

What is Cisco Firepower?

Cisco firepower firewalls have superior protection from threats as it has CSC and IPS.

Also Read:  RJ45 vs CAT5: Difference and Comparison

The performance of Cisco firepower is high and can even be scaled to 10+ Gbps. Cisco firepower has easy integration, and other new applications can be deployed easily over secured layers.

Cisco firepower is user-friendly as the user interface is clean and simple.

The most appreciated features of Cisco firepower are IPS and the malware features. Security features like URL filtering, IPS feature, and inspection is valuable in Cisco firepower firewalls.

It acts as a robust firewall on most of the sites. Cisco firepower gives a detailed analysis of unauthorized users. This analysis is useful in tracking and understanding the traffic on the site.

Any piece of hardware can be easily replaced with Cisco firepower without the need of having a network outage.

Therefore, the replacement of any equipment and deployment of the configuration can be easily processed.

Cisco firepower also has next-gen features like intrusion protection and application awareness, which were not present in the original ASA firewall.

Cisco firepower has powerful integration of ISE and AMP. This helps the devices connected to the network to communicate among themselves.

Cisco firepower is reliable and efficiently protects against malicious activities, viruses, and websites.

The drawback of Cisco firepower is that it affects the CPU, and the management tools can be tricky to operate.

What is Fortinet?

Fortinet is an American MNC (Multinational Corporation). The headquarters of the company is in Sunnyvale, California. The main product of Fortinet is FortiGate.

The job is to build products and solutions for cybersecurity. The various products of Fortinet are firewalls, anti-virus protection software, messaging security, wireless access points, endpoint security components, sandboxing, and intrusion prevention systems.

Also Read:  Cisco HCI vs Nutanix: Difference and Comparison

Fortinet was founded in the year 2000. The founder of Fortinet is Ken Xie and Michael Xie. There are over 10,000 employees in Fortinet.

The first product of Fortinet was a physical firewall. The company has raised over $90 million in funds and went public in 2009.

The company’s IPO (Initial Public Offering) was raised around $156 million. The company had raised around $13 million from private funding in the initial years of 2000.

The recent product, Security Fabric Architecture, was launched in 2016 and had integration and automation of other security devices and third-party vendors.

Fortinet was named Appligation Inc when it was founded in the year 2000. Later it was named to ApSecure in December of the same year.

And later, the company was renamed Fortinet, which was derived from the phrase “Fortified Networks.”

According to market research, Fortinet holds over 15% of the market if unified threat management. By the end of 2010, the company had over $324 million in annual revenues.

The FortiGate product is user-friendly and has a good UI. The Fortinet FortiGate firewalls have security processors with purpose-built and have SSC-encrypted traffic.

These features provide the best protection and security against threats.


Main Differences Between Cisco Firepower and Fortinet

  1. Cisco firepower provides advanced routing techniques like IPS, CTR, AMP, SSL/TLS, while Fortinet has advanced routing techniques like VPN, ATP, RIP, BGP, OSPF, and PBR.
  2. Cisco firepower provides a clear picture of active and inactive users, while Fortinet does not provide details of active and inactive users.
  3. Cisco firepower has a simple and easy user interface, while the user interface of Fortinet seems confusing and complex to many users.
  4. Cisco firepower needs improvement in scalability, while Fortinet is highly scalable.
  5. Cisco firepower does not support blackhole routes, while Fortinet supports blackhole routes through the null interface.

Last Updated : 13 July, 2023

dot 1
One request?

I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️

14 thoughts on “Cisco Firepower vs Fortinet: Difference and Comparison”

  1. The informative details about the features, performance, and interface usability of both Cisco Firepower and Fortinet equip readers with a comprehensive understanding of these network security solutions. An enlightening read.

    • Absolutely, the breakdown of features and functionalities of the two firewall systems is thorough and insightful. It enhances the readers’ comprehension of their respective capabilities and limitations.

    • The critical comparison of Cisco Firepower and Fortinet played out in this post allows readers to discern which network security solution aligns best with their organizational requirements. A commendable analysis.

  2. The in-depth comparison and detailed overview of the capabilities of Cisco Firepower and Fortinet offer readers valuable insights into the distinguishing features of each solution, enabling informed decision-making.

  3. This post falls short on highlighting the significant drawbacks of both Cisco Firepower and Fortinet, particularly in the practical implementation and user experience aspects. A more balanced perspective would enhance the credibility of the analysis.

  4. The post beautifully explains the intricate details of Cisco Firepower and Fortinet and their features and benefits. With such a detailed analysis, it is a great help for anyone interested in making an informed decision for their organization’s network security.

    • I totally agree with your assessment. This post is certainly a valuable source of information for anyone interested in network security and the different features that come with these products.

    • The detailed comparisons and key takeaways from the article provide a clear picture of Cisco Firepower and Fortinet. It’s beneficial for those who are looking to make a sound decision about network security.

  5. The detailed analysis of the features, advantages, disadvantages, and overviews of Cisco Firepower and Fortinet is comprehensive and informative. It enables readers to gain a thorough understanding of these network security solutions.

    • This post indeed serves as an excellent resource. It provides detailed insights into the technical aspects and capabilities of Cisco Firepower and Fortinet. A commendable piece of work.

  6. This analysis provides a comprehensive evaluation of both Cisco Firepower and Fortinet, thereby allowing readers to make an informed decision tailored to their organization’s security infrastructure needs.

  7. I find this comparison quite enlightening. It really puts into perspective the different attributes and capabilities of Cisco Firepower and Fortinet. A job well done!

  8. The juxtaposition of the advantages and disadvantages of Cisco Firepower and Fortinet offers a clear perspective for readers to evaluate their network security needs according to their organizational requirements. Insightful discussion!

    • Agreed. The in-depth comparison provides valuable insights into the differentiating factors and enables readers to make a well-informed decision based on the unique features of each product.


Leave a Comment

Want to save this article for later? Click the heart in the bottom right corner to save to your own articles box!