When the world was free of technology, the best way to keep memories was to click a simple photograph and keep a hard copy of that forever or paint the memory with actual colours.
But as the grasp of technology has increased on the lives of humans, multiple formats of keeping images, particularly memories, have come into play. Two such formats are JPEG and RAW. A lot of differences lie between these two.
Key Takeaways
- JPEG files are compressed, resulting in smaller file sizes but potentially losing image quality.
- RAW files preserve all image data captured by the camera, offering greater flexibility in post-processing.
- Photographers use JPEG for sharing and web display, while RAW is preferred for professional editing and archival purposes.
JPEG vs RAW
JPEG is a compressed image format that uses lossy compression to reduce file size but can lead to a loss of image quality. RAW files are more significant than JPEG files but contain more information and can be edited with greater flexibility, but require specialized software and are not supported by all devices.
JPEG refers to a complete form that refers to a particular group named a joint photographic experts group. This format is widely prevalent worldwide because it allows all users, no matter what kind of device they use, to open the image and edit it as per their own choice.
While on the other hand, RAW, in terms of photography, refers to a particular image format that is not processed yet by any of the devices, and to edit an image in this specific format, it is necessary at the person should only use software that has been manufactured by the company by whose camera the actual picture was taken.
Comparison Table
| Parameters of Comparison | JPEG | RAW |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning | Victim refers to another image format popular in a limited variety of people. | Joint photographic experts group is the complete form of the term. |
| Full form | No such complete form is available. | Colour yielding |
| Space occupied | This particular format occupies less space. | This particular format occupies a lot of space in the device in which it is stored. |
| 256 colours | 16 million colours | The images are compressed to a vast extent and hence less space is occupied. |
| Information stored | Very little information about the image is stored in this format | Almost all kinds of possible information about the image are stored in this format. |
| Capability of compression | The images are not compressed, and the original file stays in place. | The images are not compressed and the original file stays in place. |
What is JPEG?
JPEG is known to be the most standard form of image format all across the world, and no matter what kind of device a person is using, accessing this particular format is quite simple in all of them, and this is what makes this format a universally accepted one.
The term itself refers to a joint photographic experts’ group and entails certain qualities of an image format for any digitally created or stored image.
The first quality that this particular format entails is that it allows the user to not only store or open this in any device belonging to any company but also allows the user to edit the image as per his liking.
Another very important quality of this image format is that it compresses the images to a very significant extent and thereby occupies very little space on any device, so it can be said that it is very feasible to use this particular format for almost all the images.
However, one downside of this format is that it contains limited information about the image in question and does not tell all about it.
What is RAW?
The term is raw in photography represents a very significant image format unknown to many due to its rare qualities and the strange accessibility technique it entails.
The fundamental nature of this format is that it is an unprocessed one and refers to an image that has just been clicked and has not been processed in a fully developed image; therefore, in other words, it can also be called a negative that exists not in the hard copy but in the soft copy.
A significant advantage of this particular format is that when an image belongs to this format, the user may know all about the idea because the form contains all the information that is even remotely related to the image.
But this advantage also brings a downside: due to containing all the information about the images, this format occupies a lot of space in any device.
The particular reason behind this format being less popular than other formats is that it can only be accessed in software that has been manufactured by the same company that manufactured the original camera by which the photo was taken. Due to this abnormal condition, many people tend to ignore this format.
Main Differences Between JPEG and RAW
- JPEG refers to a joint photographic experts group, while on the other hand, RAW does not have a definite full form.
- JPEG stores very less information about the image while on the other hand, RAW stores a lot of information about the image and contains almost everything.
- JPEG compresses the images so much and alters the size a lot, while on the other hand, RAW does not compress the image at all and retains the original size.
- JPEG can be accessed on all platforms, while on the other hand, RAW contains certain limitations as to accessibility.
- JPEG stores very little space on the device while on the other hand, RAW stores a lot of space on the device.
References
- https://www.cv-foundation.org/openaccess/content_cvpr_2016/html/Nguyen_RAW_Image_Reconstruction_CVPR_2016_paper.html
- https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6126492/
I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️
The information presented here is extremely important and has helped me greatly. It is articles like this one that will help us understand how much photography has evolved.
The format of the article was very organized, unfortunately, I still have some doubts.
I found the article quite informative in detailing the advantages and drawbacks of both formats. Great job!
I second that. It’s rare to find such well-explained information.
The details about the two formats are very enlightening, the article is written in a very clear and understandable way.
Exactly Bennett, it is great to find such valuable information easily accessible.
This article seems to slightly favour jpeg over raw, I would like to see a more balanced view.
I completely agree Oliver, the author’s opinion seems biased in that regard.
The article is just presenting the facts Oliver. It’s up to us to draw our conclusions.
Sarcasm is sometimes lost in writing, so I am unsure if the article is being sarcastic or not.
I get what you’re saying. It’s like the comment about RAW being less popular because of its ‘strange accessibility technique’ and ‘abnormal condition’. It was odd to me.