In scientific methods, theorizing and formulating laws are two important steps. Law and Theory are two words which are interrelated and used when it comes to Science.
People think they can be used alternatively. However, they have very different meanings and understanding the differences is necessary to understand Science better.
Key Takeaways
- The law refers to a statement describing a phenomenon observed repeatedly and proven true.
- The theory is an explanation that attempts to describe why a phenomenon occurs based on available evidence and observations.
- Laws are more specific and narrow in scope, while theories are more comprehensive and wide-ranging.
Law vs Theory
The difference between Law and Theory is that a law is based on facts; it is a detailed explanation of how some part of the natural world works and is based on mathematics. On the other hand, a theory is a hypothesis that seeks to explain something which may be based on a coincidence or a fact that hasn’t been completely explained.
Laws are universally recognised and are the foundations of science. They must never make a mistake.
If a law is proven inaccurate, all science based on it is also incorrect.
When a law is written, it contains no explanations; it is a fact based on observations. Science believes all scientific laws and theories to be valid.
When new evidence arises, however, theories may be disproven.
The theory is a proposed explanation based on rigorous studies and interpretation. Theories can be used to generate hypotheses and allow for error and, as a result, allow for change as discoveries either strengthen or radically change them.
Comparison Table
Parameters of comparison | Law | Theory |
---|---|---|
Definition | A law is a universally accepted fact or equation that can be used to make accurate predictions. | A theory is a comprehensive explanation based on well-documented data from experiments that observe natural processes. |
Requirement | A law must be factual and should be unchanging. | A theory must be substantiated, explanatory, predictive, and testable to be valid. |
Changes | A law cannot be changed with time. A law is always constant. | A theory can be changed or replaced after extensive research and over time. |
Example | Mendel’s Law of Independent Assortment. | The theory of the Big Bang or Darwin’s theory of Evolution. |
What is Law?
Law is a verbal or mathematical statement summarising many experimental scientific findings. It explains or forecasts those aspects of the natural world that never change under the same circumstances.
Law is any scientific theory that has been proven valid repeatedly and is thus accepted without doubt by most people.
The law of gravity is a prime example of this. It has been noted that an apple falls to the Earth’s surface.
It’s a truth that can’t be denied. There are no exceptions to this rule.
No one has ever seen a phenomenon in the reverse or the opposite direction. As a consequence, it is considered a law.
It has been proven to be true over time but has no real explanation for why it occurs. Hooke’s law, for example, does not explain why a spring works and Newton’s law of gravity does not explain why gravity exists.
Put another way; a law explains how something works but not why.
Laws help you predict what will happen in specific situations. Newton’s third rule, for example, states that the harder a softball is struck with a bat, the faster and further the ball will fly away from the bat.
What is Theory?
In common usage, the term “theory” implies mere speculation, but in science, a theory is not considered a theory until several independent experiments have validated it.
\A theory is a well-supported interpretation of any aspect of the natural world based on evidence, assumptions, and laws.
A theory is a formalised interpretation of observational evidence in the form of a law. In simple terms, a theory is a logic that underpins a law.
A theory, as described by the scientific community, describes how nature acts under some circumstances. Theories appear to be as large as the empirical evidence that supports them allows.
A theory begins with a hypothesis, which is a proposed explanation for a natural phenomenon. Researchers develop scientific experiments to test their theories under natural conditions to transform a hypothesis into an established theory.
Scientists collect enough evidence to prove their hypothesis, making it a theory with predictive ability by following the scientific method and paying close attention to detail.
Theories are the basis for advancing scientific understanding and putting the knowledge to practical use. Scientists use theories to create new inventions or find a cure for a disease.
Theories can evolve, but it’s a long process. Many findings or evidence that the theory cannot explain are required for a theory to alter.
Main Differences Between Law and Theory
- Theories are scientifically supported explanations of observations that make valid predictions and have been scientifically tested in various ways. At the same time, laws are widely accepted facts or equations capable of making true predictions.
- Theories describe nature’s functions, while laws describe what happens when those conditions are met.
- Laws compile many facts, while theory is complicated and descriptive.
- A better theory may substitute a theory; however, a law cannot be replaced.
- According to the amount of evidence available, a theory may be strong or weak, whereas law is a truth that is uniformly observed.
The post about Law and Theory is very well written and covers the topic extensively.
The post sheds light on an important scientific topic and provides valuable insights.
The depth and detail of the content are impressive, Donna96. I value the insights provided in the post.
The explanations are quite thorough and leave no ambiguity. Very well done!
I completely agree with your assessment, Aclarke. The article is thorough and informative.
Absolutely, Aclarke. The depth of explanation in the article is commendable.
Although the explanations are accurate, I find the post to be a bit too serious and lacking some humor.
I see your point, Joe Jackson. Maybe a bit of humor could make it more engaging.
I prefer the serious tone, Joe Jackson. I think it maintains the scientific integrity of the post.
The post has a great level of scientific detail and really explores the topic of Law and Theory.
I agree, Yrose. The detailed explanations offer a comprehensive understanding.
This post makes the distinction between Law and Theory crystal clear. Great job with the explanations!
The post is incredibly informative and well-structured. I learned a lot from it.
I completely agree, Chris49. The content of the article provides a clear and concise explanation.
I’m not fully convinced about the content and believe it oversimplified the topic.
I have to disagree, Gordon93. I think the content provides a comprehensive overview in a concise way.
I understand your point, Gordon93, but I found the post very informative and easy to understand.
The explanation of the Law vs Theory comparison is very insightful.
Absolutely! This post does a great job in illustrating the differences between laws and theories.
I do think it is interesting to compare the concept of Law and Theory, and the post does a good job explaining it.
Great content! It’s important to understand and differentiate between laws and theories. It’s also important to remember that scientific progress is based on both. So interesting!
I agree, Lmitchell. The post provides a very clear explanation of the distinction between laws and theories.
Yes, definitely! The post’s content can help a lot of people understand this concept better.