Difference Between Seagate Firecuda and Samsung 970 Evo Plus (With Table)

A drive is often used to have more storage space and better-accessing quality. There are two types of dives in the market. One is a traditional hard disk drive, and the other one is a solid storage device that is faster than Hard disk drives and used to store data in instantly accessible memory chips.

Such two types of Drive are Seagate firecuda by Seagate and Samsung 970 Evo by Samsung.

Seagate Firecuda vs Samsung 970 Evo Plus

The difference between Seagate Firecuda and Samsung 970 Evo is that they have different speeds, sequential read/write, and consistency. When it comes to speed, Seagate firecuda is the fastest drive in the market. The memory storage is better in Samsung 970 and also is cheaper than Seagate firecuda. They both come with smart support and trim support.

Seagate firecuda is an SSD that is faster than Samsung 970 Evo and has a better benchmark in terms of accessing data. In Seagate fire, the flash memory type is a 3D tri-level cell. Meld with NAND flash technology, these drives have a good capacity and are also backed up with 5 years of warranty.

Samsung 970 Evo is an SSD that is popular for its best-in-class reliability, having a broad range of capacity of 2TB. It has equipped with Intelligent TurboWrite technology that enhances graphics editing and high-end gaming. It is meld with the latest V-NAND technology and a new Phoenix controller.

Comparison Table Between Seagate Firecuda and Samsung 970 Evo Plus

Parameters of ComparisonSeagate FirecudaSamsung 970 Evo Plus
Flash memory typeIt has a 3D Tri-level cell.It has V-NAND, 3 bit, multi-level cell.
Max Sequential WriteThe maximum sequential write is up to 4400 MB/sThe maximum sequential write is up to 3300 MB/s
Max Sequential ReadThe maximum sequential read is up to 5000 MB/sThe maximum sequential read is up to 3500 MB/s.
Endurance The total bytes written is 850 TBThe total bytes written is 300 TB
Storage CapacityThe storage comes with 500GBThe storage capacity is up to 2000GB

What is Seagate Firecuda?

Seagate Firecude is a hybrid drive that can be a great replacement for the traditional hard drives used in PC. These drives come with the features of a small amount of NAND flash storage with the combination of HDD-style magnetic tape. The combination of both speed of SSDs and the mass volume of HDDs makes it very popular because of its faster operation than a standard HDD.

This 2.5-inch drive comes with a capacity of 500GB, 1TB, AND 2TB with a SATA interface and sequential read up to 140MB/s. Apart from it, the average power consumption is 1.8W, and durability is 600,000 loads/reload cycles. It is generally recommended for Gamers and for those who want faster loading time without sacrificing the capacity and giving them the best performances.

With high endurance ratings, up to 5 years of warranty, and these also come with a three years warranty of Rescue Data Recovery services that will let the users protect the precious data against unexpected data loss where traditional usually fails. Also, there is less power consumption and less heat generation that helps increase the system performance and improves durability, especially when it comes to run multiple applications.

What is Samsung 970 Evo Plus?

Samsung 970 Evo is the fastest SSDs that is developed by Samsung and recommended mainly for tech enthusiasts, professionals, and hardcore gamers. Equipped with V5 flash, this SSD gets its high performance bumped up to 3.5 GB/s, and there is an endurance capacity of 1,200 TBW with a five-year warranty. This SSD comes with a feature that it boasts hardware encryption support and comes with a budget-friendly price.

These Samsung drivers are best in reliability, speed and come with a wide range of capacity options up to 2TB. The enhanced high-eng gaming with 3D graphic editing has the latest V-NAND, Intelligent TurboWrite technology, and a new Phoenix controller. These all give it a sequential read/write speed of 3500/2500 MB/s*, and that makes it 32% faster than the previous ones.

With a great expanding storage capacity, Samsung has unveiled innovative technology that will help in empowering and accomplishing more. Its latest V-NAND technology makes it exceptional in terms of endurance, and it is 50% more efficient than the previous generation that also has a feature of superior heat dissipation. The performance drops are minimized by maintaining the optimal operating temperatures.

Main Differences Between Seagate Firecuda and Samsung 970 Evo Plus

  1. Seagate Firecuda is comprised of 3D Tri-level cells, whereas Samsung Evo is comprised of V-NAND, 3 bit, multi-level cells.
  2. Seagate Firecuda has the maximum sequential write up to 4400 MB/s, whereas Samsung Evo has the maximum sequential write is up to 3300 MB/s.
  3. Seagate Firecuda the maximum sequential read is up to 5000 MB/s, whereas Samsung Evo has The maximum sequential read is up to 3500 MB/s.
  4. The storage comes with 500GB in Seagate firecuda, whereas the storage capacity comes with 2000 GB in Samsung 970 Evo.
  5. Seagate Firecuda is a faster drive than Samsung Evo.
  6. Seagate SSDs have a better delivery improvement in bandwidth than Samsun 970 Evo.
  7. Samsung Evo is better in transfer rates and supports higher maximum transfer rates than Seagate fire Cuda.

Conclusion

Both these drives have their pros and cons. They both are used for professional purposes and for gamers. They provide large storage capacity, have good sequential read and write, and give high performance.

Both these drives are good, but there are a lot of factors that are taken into account to buy one of them. It all depends on the use and purpose. Seagate fire gives better performance and is faster than Samsung 970 Evo. Samsung Evo, on the other hand, has more storage capacity and is also a high contender in features like sequential read and random read. Moreover, the better the features, the easier is it to decide. 

References

  1. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/1315112/
  2. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/1376616.1376723
x
2D vs 3D