Cisco Quad Camera vs SpeakerTrack: Difference and Comparison

Cisco has been a pioneer in the industry of networking software, hardware and various other technical services and products for many years. The company has launched video conferencing systems that have proven to be advantageous for numerous businesses. Cisco Quad Camera and SpeakerTrack are cameras that are installed in these video systems.

Key Takeaways

  1. Cisco Quad Camera features four integrated cameras, enabling wide-angle and close-up views, while SpeakerTrack uses two separate cameras that track active speakers.
  2. Cisco Quad Camera relies on advanced image processing for speaker tracking, whereas SpeakerTrack employs audio triangulation and facial recognition.
  3. Cisco Quad Camera is compatible with the Cisco Webex Room Panorama, while SpeakerTrack is designed for use with the Cisco TelePresence MX700 and MX800 systems.

Cisco Quad Camera vs SpeakerTrack

The difference between Cisco Quad Camera and SpeakerTrack is that Cisco Quad Camera is a relatively smaller and lightweight device that facilitates a resolution of 5120 X 2880 pixels, whereas SpeakerTrack is a large and heavyweight camera that only facilitates a resolution of 1080 pixels. While Quad Camera is ultra-high definition, SpeakerTrack is only high definition.

Cisco Quad Camera vs SpeakerTrack

Cisco Quad Camera comes with the WebEx Room Kit Plus conference system. It is a 5k Ultra HD camera with 5x digital zoom. The camera has the excellent panning capability and a substantial field of view for medium to large-sized conference rooms. It even has a built-in microphone and speaker.

Meanwhile, SpeakerTrack is a dual-camera device that is compatible with various video systems. It is a high-definition camera with 2x digital zoom. The field of view is not as scalable as the Quad Camera but is still good enough for large rooms. SpeakerTrack has a built-in microphone and speaker as well.

Comparison Table

Parameters of ComparisonCisco Quad CameraSpeakerTrack
DimensionsCisco Quad Camera is smaller with 120mm height, 95mm width and 103mm depth.SpeakerTrack is larger with 292mm height, 800mm width and 210mm depth.
WeightIt is lighter, weighing 4.8 kg.It is heavier, weighing 11.5 kg.
ResolutionIt has a 5k ultra-HD resolution.It has 1080p60 high-definition resolution.
ZoomIt has 5x digital zoom.It has 2x digital zoom.
Field of ViewIt has 83 degrees horizontal and 51.5 degrees field of view.It has 80 degrees horizontal and 48.8 degrees vertical field of view.
Manual FocusIt does not have a manual focus.It has a manual focus.
HDMI ConnectionIt has 2 HDMI connections.It has only 1 HDMI connection.
F-ValueIt has an F-Value of 2.0.It has an F-Value of 1.5.
CompatibilityIt is compatible with Cisco WebEx Codec Pro, Codec Plus, and Telepresence SX80 codec.It is compatible with all devices such as the former along with Telepresence C90, C60 and C40.

What is Cisco Quad Camera?

Cisco Quad Camera is a device that comes with the WebEx Room Kit Plus. It comes with 5k ultra-HD resolution and 5x digital zoom. A microphone and speaker are integrated into the system, providing a high-quality audio experience. The camera is perfect for medium to large-sized conference rooms that seat up to 14 people. It even comes with a Room Navigator control panel.

Also Read:  Cisco ISE vs ACS: Difference and Comparison

The device is lightweight and small, making it easy to move and install. It has a height of 120mm, a width of 95mm and a depth of 103mm. The weight of the camera is 4.8 kg. There are 2 HDMI connections available in its system. However, Cisco Quad Camera is only compatible with Cisco WebEx Codec Pro, Codec Plus, and Telepresence SX80 codec.

Regardless, it has 83 degrees horizontal and 51.5 degrees field of view. This facilitates a good view and panning capability. The camera automatically detects all the participants in the meeting, thereby framing them in a manner that is comfortable to the eye.

The camera even has a noise-suppressing ability. This feature reduces all the unwanted and grainy noises that are made in the background. Moreover, the software of the video system updates on its own.

What is SpeakerTrack?

The Cisco Telepresence SpeakerTrack 60 is a dual-camera system that facilitates a rich video and audio experience for users. The cameras have a 1080p60 resolution and 2x digital zoom. Like Quad Camera, this device also has a built-in speaker and microphone. This is one of its unique selling points.

An active speaker is installed into this system, enabling the camera to display a realistic view without resizing any element. With this, the meetings can flow smoothly as the dual camera instantly tracks all the participants and switches its use. Moreover, there is no delay in video transmission, which allows the people at the other end to watch everything in real-time.

The device is compatible with Cisco WebEx Codec Pro, WebEx Plus, Cisco Telepresence SX80 codec, Telepresence C90 codec, Telepresence C60 Codec and Telepresence C40 Codec. It has 80 degrees horizontal and 48.8 degrees vertical field of view. Furthermore, it has a height of 292mm, a width of 800mm, and a depth of 210mm. The device weighs 11.5 kg.

Also Read:  Verizon vs Comcast: Difference and Comparison

The design of the camera is heavyweight but still well-mounted. Its industrial architecture allows it to blend into the room without looking too quirky. Moreover, the hardware can even withstand low temperatures and high humidity.

Main differences Between Cisco Quad Camera and SpeakerTrack

  1. Cisco Quad Camera is smaller, with 120mm height, 95mm width and 103mm depth, whereas SpeakerTrack is relatively larger, with 292mm height, 800mm width and 210mm depth.
  2. Cisco Quad Camera is lighter, weighing 4.8 kg, whereas SpeakerTrack is lightweight, weighing 11.5 kg.
  3. Cisco Quad Camera has 5k ultra-HD resolution whereas SpeakerTrack has 1080p60 high-definition resolution.
  4. Cisco Quad Camera has  5x digital zoom, whereas SpeakerTrack only has 2x digital zoom.
  5. Cisco Quad Camera has 83 degrees horizontal and 51.5 degrees field of view, whereas SpeakerTrack has 80 degrees horizontal and 48.8 degrees vertical field of view.
  6. Cisco Quad Camera does not have manual focus, whereas SpeakerTrack has manual focus.
  7. Cisco Quad Camera has 2 HDMI connections, whereas SpeakerTrack only has one.
  8. Cisco Quad Camera has an F-Value of 2.0, whereas SpeakerTrack has an F-Value of 1.5.
  9. Cisco Quad Camera is compatible with Cisco WebEx Codec Pro, Codec Plus, and Telepresence SX80 codec, whereas SpeakerTrack is compatible with more devices.
References
  1. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=1fKoJX40KtYC&oi=fnd&pg=PR20&dq=Cisco+quad+camera&ots=oUukJNGhUh&sig=0tmbbOfdERmY624xNIk9rD7bA3U
  2. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9053171/

Last Updated : 13 July, 2023

dot 1
One request?

I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️

12 thoughts on “Cisco Quad Camera vs SpeakerTrack: Difference and Comparison”

  1. The detailed comparison between the Cisco Quad Camera and SpeakerTrack provides a clear understanding of their technical aspects and functionalities. Overall, it’s a well-structured and informative article.

    Reply
    • I completely agree. The article sheds light on the nuances of these video systems, making it an excellent resource for businesses seeking to invest in high-quality conferencing technology.

      Reply
  2. The detailed specifications and unique functionalities of the Cisco Quad Camera and SpeakerTrack are clearly explained in the article. This in-depth analysis is beneficial for businesses seeking advanced video conferencing solutions.

    Reply
    • I agree that the detailed comparison is invaluable in understanding the distinct benefits and applications of these video systems, allowing companies to make informed choices based on their specific requirements.

      Reply
    • Absolutely, the detailed insights into the technical specifications and differences between the Quad Camera and SpeakerTrack provide a comprehensive understanding of their capabilities, aiding companies in assessing their conferencing needs.

      Reply
  3. The comprehensive overview of Cisco Quad Camera and SpeakerTrack, along with their comparisons, is highly educational. It offers detailed insights into the unique features and compatibility of these advanced conferencing systems.

    Reply
  4. The comparison table is particularly helpful in illustrating the distinctions between the two camera systems. It’s clear that both have unique advantages and capabilities catering to different business needs.

    Reply
  5. The information about Cisco Quad Camera and SpeakerTrack is comprehensive and thoroughly detailed. The article effectively highlights the key features and specifications of each system.

    Reply
  6. The detailed descriptions of the technical specifications, dimensions, and resolutions of the Cisco Quad Camera and SpeakerTrack are impressive. This article is a valuable resource for organizations exploring video conferencing solutions.

    Reply
    • Absolutely, the nuanced details and comparative analysis provide an insightful overview of the capabilities and compatibility of these systems, helping businesses make informed decisions.

      Reply
  7. The thorough explanation of Cisco Quad Camera and SpeakerTrack, along with their unique features, enables readers to gain a deep understanding of these advanced video conferencing technologies. The article is highly informative.

    Reply
  8. The technical specifications provided in this article are very in-depth and helpful in understanding the differences between the Quad Camera and SpeakerTrack. The article is well-researched and provides valuable insights.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Want to save this article for later? Click the heart in the bottom right corner to save to your own articles box!