Difference Between Microsoft Wireless Display Adapter and Chromecast (With Table)

The field of entertainment has improved a lot. Many new devices have entered the market to enhance our entertainment experience. Microsoft’s Wireless Display Adapter and Google’s Chromecast are two devices that can display content from our devices to widescreen digital TVs. Both have the same function so if you are looking for the better one, then know the difference between them.

Microsoft Wireless Display Adapter vs Chromecast

The Difference Between Microsoft Wireless Display Adapter and Chromecast is that Microsoft Wireless Display Adapter uses Miracast technology, which makes it more popular, and Chromecast, on the other hand, uses proprietary technology, which means they use of it is not boundless. But if we compare the prices, then Chromecast happens to be cheaper than Microsoft Wireless Display Adapter.

Microsoft Wireless Display Adapter is one of the many available options for streaming device content on TV. Any type of app can be compatible with this adapter as it uses Miracast technology. However, this adapter might not be the best fit for iOS users.

Chromecast is another device that lets you stream any type of content to the TV from devices. When compared with Microsoft Wireless Display Adapter, Chromecast is cheaper in expense. Also, it is fit to run on any version of Windows.

Comparison Table Between Microsoft Wireless Display Adapter and Chromecast

Parameters of ComparisonMicrosoft Wireless Display AdapterChromecast
What can be streamed Microsoft’s Wireless Display Adapter is capable of reflecting the screen of the device.Chromecast stream select Internet media streams and local media or web browser tabs.
Technology usedMiracast technology gets used by Microsoft wireless display adapter. Chromecast utilises proprietary technology.
ExpenseMicrosoft Wireless Display Adapter is more expensive.Comparatively, Google’s Chromecast is less expensive.
FunctionalOperating systems that are preliminary to Windows 8.1 can not use Microsoft wireless display adapter.Chromecast can work on all the versions of the Windows system.
Required ConnectionMicrosoft wireless display adapter has Wi-Fi Direct so it does not need a separate Wi-Fi router.Chromecast needs a separately connected Wi-Fi router.

What is Microsoft Wireless Display Adapter?

Microsoft Wireless Display Adapter enables you to stream content or even apps from your device to HDTV or monitor. Through the use of the adapter, the apps will not be only limited to your smartphone. This is a wireless facility whose utilisation will let you view photos from your device or stream movies. You can also show presentations on a big screen, and everything will be wireless.

It uses Miracast technology which means you are free to use any app and content. You are not bound to certain types of files or be limited to a few kinds of apps. It can hold up to 32 GB. The facility of Direct Wi-Fi let Microsoft wireless display adapter work without any Wi-Fi router.

Even after all the benefits, it has a few drawbacks. It can not operate in the Windows versions that were created before the 8.1 version. In addition to that, for iOS users, Microsoft wireless display adapter is not the best fit. This is due to the fact that apps to support this system is not available here.

What is Chromecast?

Chromecast is presented by Google, and it is a streaming media adapter. Users can play any content on TV through a mobile app. Your devices can work as a TV remote and change your experience of watching your favourite shows and personal pictures. Chromecast has proprietary technology, which does not let it get compatible with all the available options of apps. Chromecast faces few limitations there.

Google’s Chromecast offers you the facility to stream from your device to your TV. You can effortlessly enjoy numerous Android and iPhone apps to play your videos. Surfing the web on a big screen will also be attainable through this device. You can also mirror your laptop screen on the TV. By using Chromecast, one can stream content from various sources, for instance, Netflix, YouTube, Hulu, and Google Play music. You can also browse content from Chrome.

Main Differences Between Microsoft Wireless Display Adapter and Chromecast

  1. Miracast technology is used by Microsoft wireless display adapter whereas Google’s Chromecast utilises the technology of proprietary which means the compatibility with the apps is limited In case of Chromecast.
  2. Microsoft wireless display adapter has Wi-Fi Direct, and as a result that, it does not need a separate Wi-Fi router. But Chromecast does not have Direct Wi-Fi, so it requires to have a separate Wi-Fi router.
  3. Microsoft wireless display adapter is younger than Chromecast, so it does not work in any Windows system that came before 8.1. But Chromecast is capable of working on all the versions of the Windows system.
  4. Microsoft Wireless Display Adapter costs more than Chromecast. And when Chromecast is compared to Microsoft Wireless Display Adapter, it seems cheaper.
  5. People with Android can enjoy Microsoft wireless display adapter better than the users of iOS as the apps supporting this function is not very much available. Chromecast as well largely supports Android applications.


If you are looking for a streaming dongle and are interested to know which one is better between the two, then you must keep on some points in mind. The functionality is same for the both. Both get the same job done in the same process. But their compatibility with the required apps and price are different.

If you are a user of iOS, then it is better for you to opt for Chromecast. Also, if you use a prior version of Windows 8.1, then also Chromecast is the right option for you. But if your requirements include your adapter to be compatible with every available streaming app, then you must choose Microsoft’s wireless display adapter. Chromecast faces hurdles in this particular area.


  1. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/LHT-04-2017-0070/full/html
  2. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2839313
2D vs 3D