In the contemporary world, it is easy to find out several cars with completely different styles. Some of them are Coupes, station wagons, sports cars, convertibles, minivans, sport utility vehicles, pickup trucks, and many more. They all are amazing in their own right, as well as they are really good choices.
Many manufacturers are dropping their hatchbacks and sedans. But Toyota Corolla and Mazda 3 continue to stand out. They are available in a range of sizes. In this article, the main focus is the comparison between Toyota Corolla and Mazda 3.
Key Takeaways
- The Toyota Corolla is known for its reliability, fuel efficiency, and lower cost of ownership, while the Mazda 3 offers sportier handling, a more upscale interior, and advanced technology features.
- The Corolla has a reputation for long-lasting quality, whereas the Mazda 3 focuses on driving dynamics and a more engaging experience.
- Both vehicles provide various safety and convenience features, but the Mazda 3 receives higher ratings for its overall driving experience and design aesthetics.
Toyota Corolla vs Mazda 3
The Toyota Corolla is a compact sedan that has been in production since the 1960s, is one of the best-selling cars of all time, and is known for its reliability and fuel efficiency. The Mazda 3 is a compact car that is known for its sporty performance, stylish design, and advanced features.
The Toyota Corolla can captivate the hearts of fervent riders due to its futuristic and sleek design. When it comes to exterior and interior, it has been a perfect design. To enhance the right quality, it is equipped with the latest features. The seat quality of the Corolla is also terrific.
Mazda 3 looks great, not for just the class or hatchback, but genuinely great. The four-cylinder of Mazda 3 has lots of low-end torque and gives plenty of power off the line. It has a well-weighted steering combination and a responsive suspension which helps its corner exceptionally good for the class.
Comparison Table
| Parameters of Comparison | Toyota Corolla | Mazda 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | 1.8-liter 14 | 2.0-liter 14 |
| Base curb weight (lbs.) | 2910 | 3071 |
| Horsepower | 139 hp @ 6,100 rpm | 155 hp @ 6,000 rpm |
| Transmission | CVT | 6-spd automatic |
| Trunk volume (cu. ft.) | 13.1 | 13.2 |
What is Toyota Corolla?
Over the variety of roads, the right quality of Corolla is smooth, and the front seats are comfortable. There are enough sufficient adjustments range within those adjustments for a preferred position.
Cloth seats are preferred since they better the availability of simulated leather on hot days.
The controls of Corolla are grouped logically. With regard to headroom, the rear passenger seat is tight. The head of adult occupants might be close to the roof.
In comparison to its primary competition, it has a slightly smaller trunk.
On the highway, it gets so loud that a stereo crank is required to overcome it. Under hard acceleration, the engine sounds laboured, but the continuous variable of simulated gear transmission changes and helps to reduce the sound of drowning, which is otherwise typical for CVT.
It comes with lane centring, automatic emergency brake with forwarding collision warning, adaptive cruise controls with go/top and lane-keeping assistance. Red Cross-traffic alert and blind-spot monitoring are also available on upper trims.
What is Mazda 3?
Excellent driving characteristics are always the priority of Mazda. When the straight road stops, it delivers confidence-inspiring and comfortable handling.
It feels balanced and stays controlled around turns, and changes directions readily. Mazda 3 steering is precise and quick too.
Without sacrificing its comfort, it delivered a sporty, premium experience. The credit goes to the quiet cabin and supportive front seats at highway speeds.
When it comes to the air conditioning system, Mazda 3 does not seem sufficiently powerful as well as its seat’s head restraint is too intrusive.
The steering wheel might be telescoped out more for taller drivers, but the space for front passengers is enjoyable.
Rear headroom and legroom are below average if the front occupants’ seat slides back, then the rear seating area can feel snug. In the name of sleek styling, the space and rearward visibility has been sacrificed.
The audio system of Mazda 3 sounds great, and its infotainment screen of 8.8 inches looks vibrant and with both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto Works well.
Adaptive cruise control in heavy traffic can stop abruptly, even if it is not strictly necessary. In the case of small children, then it is a bad choice.
Main Differences Between Toyota Corolla and Mazda 3
- When it comes to handling, Toyota Corolla offers a larger turning radius in comparison to Mazda 3. That’s why Toyota Corolla fails to provide more easily manoeuvre out and in of tight spots, but Mazda 3 provides it.
- In terms of fuel economy, Toyota Corolla uses 30 MPG in the city and 38 MPG on the highway. On the other hand, Mazda 3 uses 28 MPG in the city, and on the highway, it uses 36 MPG.
- The exterior dimensions of Toyota Corolla are in such a way that its length is 182.3 in, maximum width is 70.1 in, and 56.5 in is Corolla height. Mazda 3 has a length of 183.5 in, the maximum width is 70.7, and at last, its height is 56.9 in.
- Toyota Corolla provides features like auto high-beam headlights, adaptive cruise control, and speed sign recognition. Meanwhile, lane-keeping assistance, blind-spot monitoring, and front and rear airbag coverage are a few of the Mazda 3 safety features.
- Toyota Corolla offers a torque of 126 lb-ft @ 3,900 rpm, whereas Mazda 3 offers 150 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm as its torque. This is the reason Toyota Corolla fails to provide a better job in power transmission to the wheels in comparison to Mazda 3.
I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️
After reading this article, I firmly believe that both vehicles have different features and qualities. I like how this post focused on the comparison details of both cars.
The write-up is quite engaging and appeals to those who are interested in a thorough side-by-side comparison of these two vehicles.
This article lacks depth in discussing the interior and comfort features of both vehicles. A more detailed analysis in these aspects would be beneficial.
I find it comical how the article subtly tries to favor Mazda 3 over Toyota Corolla by pointing out the latter’s drawbacks.
That’s a valid observation. The comparison seems somewhat biased in favor of the Mazda 3.
The highlights of the key takeaways make it clear which areas Toyota Corolla and Mazda 3 excel in. I think this post is informative and unbiased.
I completely disagree, as this article doesn’t compare the price range of each car, which is a crucial factor.
The detailed comparison table is helpful to understand the differences between Corolla and Mazda 3. It’s easy to compare the technical aspects side by side.