Remote Desktop Technology is very important and useful in today,s world. By this process, we can connect to another computer over a network, which is not possible to access physically.
We can remotely access as well as manage other computers from a single location.
In this article, we shall look after their common features and differences. This will help us choose the better fit for our use.
Microsoft Remote Desktop vs Teamviewer
The main difference between Microsoft Remote Desktop and Teamviewer is their compatibility with devices. Microsoft Remote can work with only Windows devices and it is considered a con.
In this system, a user can seek access or grant permission to multiple other computers from a distance. It uses its remote server which is considered a great advantage. It makes the working simple and can work on a low-speed internet.
The users work with RDP client software. It is a well-developed software and has a simple operation. It does not support IoT devices. It is comparatively expensive.
On the other hand, Teamviewer solely focuses on the security of the user and their system. It even makes room for the user to know what is happening in the process. It starts directly after the installation.
It does not require any kind of firewall configuration or port forwarding. It does support a wide range IoT devices. It is totally free for commercial purposes.
Comparison Table Between Microsoft Remote Desktop and Teamviewer
|Parameters of Difference||Microsoft Remote Desktop||Teamviewer|
|Compatibility||Can only work with Windows devices.||Can work on a wide variety of platforms which include Windows, OS, iOS, Android, macOS, etc.|
|Cost||It is expensive and complicated.||For non-commercial purposes, it is free of cost.|
|Internet speed||A fast internet connection is not mandatory since it uses the remote server||It requires a constant, fast network connection.|
|Files||Very easy to access and deal with files and folders.||Sharing large files is not allowed.|
|Connection||We can connect it to any device.||Both the connection requires the same version of Teamviewer.|
What is Microsoft Remote Desktop?
However, there are certain drawbacks of Microsoft Remote Desktop that are needed to be discussed. The security system of Microsoft Remote Desktop is not very strong.
First of all, it does not have two-factor authentication by default. Hence the RDP ports are open.
Thus we can see, there is a great risk and prone to hacking. Hence we need to use VPN whenever we are using Microsoft Remote Desktop technology. It also promotes monitoring and controlling the devices.
It is only compatible with devices with windows. Although it is very easy to update, during runtime, the whole system remains inaccessible. This causes delay or difficulty in our work. It does not allow remote reboot which is yet another limitation.
It is as well expensive and a bit complicated for multi-users. In some cases, it might need a third party for the operation. Considering the security purpose, many users might not be comfortable with this access.
What is Teamviewer?
Teamviewer is probably the most compatible technology. It has the facility to communicate through chats, video calls, and voice calls. It is free of cost for non-commercial purposes and thus less expensive.
The best part is that it is compatible with a wide range of devices from Windows to Android.
One of the main responsibilities of Teamviewer is to provide security. It provides high standard security with two-factor authentication. Moreover, it uses AES 256 bit encryption to provide the user with end-to-end security.
In case of any suspicious event, it directs the user to reset the password. When it senses a weak password, it recommends the user change it. It furthermore offers screen locks and other physical facilities to keep our data protected.
Although it provides all the easy and safe features a user needs, there are certain drawbacks too. First of all, sharing of large files is not allowed.
This type of restriction might be problematic in emergency conditions where we have no other way to access it. Secondly, it requires a constant high-speed internet connection. It might hamper the process since the connections are distant.
Main Differences Between Microsoft Remote Desktop and Teamviewer
- The main difference between Microsoft Remote Desktop and Teamviewer is the advantage of the former one over the latter one on the basis of compatibility. Microsoft Remote Desktop can only work with Windows devices whereas Teamviewer can work with Windows, OS, iOS, Android, macOS, etc.
- Next is the internet speed, which is an important point while accessing something over a distance. Microsoft Remote Desktop requires a fast internet connection since it uses a remote server. On the other hand, requires a constant, fast network connection.
- Coming to the connection between two networks. Microsoft Remote Desktop can be connected to any device. In the case of Teamviewer, Both the connection requires the same version of Teamviewer.
- Microsoft Remote Desktop is expensive and complicated. Teamviewer is free of cost for non-commercial purposes.
- In Microsoft Remote Desktop, it is very easy to access and deal with files and folders. In Teamviewer, sharing large files is not allowed.
A computer contains personal files and encrypted details. Hence to make use of this technology we need the right tools. Hence, good research is necessary.
We need to choose the process that ensures the maximum protection and least chances for hacking.
Microsoft Remote Desktop and Teamviewer are two very popular RDP. They have their pros and cons but aims for the same function. Hence we need to go through their features and decide which shall suit our system.
However, considering all the points, Teamviewer has a lot more advantages over Microsoft Remote Desktop. It does provide a wide range of facilities.
|AskAnyDifference Home||Click here|
I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️
Table of Contents