A family ride is very important when it comes to weekends.
People who are planning to travel with their family around the city can consider Toyota Wigo as it provides good support for people who want to travel with their family.
People who are looking for good fuel economy cars with low prices can consider the Mitsubishi Mirage as it meets their requirements.
Key Takeaways
- Toyota Wigo is a compact city car with a 1.0-liter engine, while Mitsubishi Mirage is a slightly larger subcompact hatchback with a 1.2-liter engine.
- Wigo offers a more affordable price point and lower fuel consumption, while Mirage provides more interior space and advanced safety features.
- Both vehicles are fuel-efficient and ideal for urban driving, but Wigo is more suited for budget-conscious buyers, while Mirage targets those seeking additional space and features.
Toyota Wigo vs Mitsubishi Mirage
The Toyota Wigo is a five-seater hatchback that has been produced by Toyota since 2013. The Mitsubishi Mirage is a five-seater hatchback that has been produced by Mitsubishi since 1978. The Wigo is a newer model known for its small size and manoeuvrability, while the Mirage has a longer history.
Toyota wigo is one of the best-selling mini hatchback cars. It is best for people who are looking for personal rides with their close ones.
It has a good backup camera and sensors, which makes your drive easier and more fun, especially when you are struggling to park your car somewhere. Unlike other cars, it is not priced unreasonably. It is one of the reasonably priced cars.
Mitsubishi Mirage is a subcompact sedan. It has got a rating of 4.0 out of 5, which makes it rank in the 6th position. This car’s average annual repair cost will be higher than the above ownership costs.
So, maintaining it would be expensive. According to the reviews from people, it is not considered a good subcompact car because of its lack of features.
Comparison Table
| Parameters of Comparison | Toyota Wigo | Mitsubishi Mirage |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | It has a 3660 * 1600 * 1520 range. | It has a 3795 * 1665 * 1510 range. |
| Air conditioning system | It uses a manual system. | It uses an automatic system. |
| Sensor back | It provides a good sensor back. | It has no sensor back. |
| Electronic brake force | It has no electronic brake force. | It has an electronic brake force. |
| Review | It is both agile and practical. | It is only practical. |
What is Toyota Wigo?
It is an entry-level hatchback. This is very good for people who want to travel every day in traffic. It will work best as a daily car. It has responsive steering, making travelling around the city comfortable.
It uses a 1.2-litre four-litre engine, making driving very convenient. The engine comes with modified pistons and a new turbocharger.
Travelling in a city will provide a good average speed of 40 km/ hr.
For people who are travelling on the highway, it offers an average speed of 90 km/ hr. If you handle the manoeuvre properly, then it would be best to go for long drives.
Because it is not a car which is recommended for long drives, after travelling it for more than 150 kilometres, you might start to feel a little tired, but it is not because of the car. It is one of the safest cars to travel.
Once you are seated inside the car, you will be able to see the features by yourself as it comes with front airbags and antilock brakes.
It comes with two options, automatic and manual. It is available in 7 colours, and the best part is it has 4 variants. It has a gasoline engine with a ground clearance of 180 mm.
Its back seats are very spacious enough for full-grown adults to sit easily. People who are planning to buy a family car can invest in this option. It also offers a generous warranty period of 3 years which is very good when compared with other brands.
What is Mitsubishi Mirage?
It is a subcompact hatchback. In the international markets, it comes with 1.2-litre engines.
This car has been developed by keeping some factors in mind, such as cost-effectiveness and affordability, so that it would fit best for the Indian market. Because of its unpowered engine, it has a very bad market rating.
Apart from that, it has below average base price. It has also got good fuel economy estimates. But these things still couldn’t overcome any negativity.
Many better options are available in the subcompact class because the Mitsubishi Mirage has an excessively lean body around its corners.
So, people started to consider some other options. Without these things, it will look good as it looks outside. It is not that much worse, but when you think of having a comfortable ride with your family members, then it is gonna disappoint you.
The interior of the car will be very poor.
One of the best things about buying this car is its warranty period. They offer a 10-year warranty period which is good, and people can’t find this in other subcompact brands.
If you want to invest in a good fuel economy class, then the Mitsubishi Mirage is good to go with. It can go up to 105 mph. That is so far the fastest speed in the Mitsubishi Mirage. It was first launched as a three-door hatchback and a five-door hatchback.
Main Differences Between Toyota Wigo and Mitsubishi Mirage
- The air conditioning system used in Toyota Wigo is manual. On the other hand, the air conditioning system used in the Mitsubishi Mirage is automatic.
- Toyota Wigo has a good sensor back which is very convenient for parking. On the other hand, in the Mitsubishi mirage, there is no sensor used.
- Toyota Wigo does not offer electronic brake force. On the other hand, the Mitsubishi Mirage offers electronic brake force.
- Toyota Wigo is both agile and practical based on user reviews. On the other hand, the Mitsubishi Mirage is only practical.
- Toyota Wigo was first launched in 2014. On the other hand, the Mitsubishi Mirage was first launched in 1978.
- Toyota Wigo offers a 3-year warranty. On the other hand, Mitsubishi Mirage offers a 10-year warranty.
- https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-76620-7_12
- https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=u7AzEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA137&dq=Toyota+Wigo+&ots=kyByJOovhZ&sig=EkKXl2tLe01an6z704kaFnSkBC8
I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️
This article provides valuable information, yet a hint of satire can be sensed in the tone.
It’s important for the writer to maintain a serious tone given the technical nature of the content.
There’s no satirical tone at all. The content is serious and informative.
Toyota Wigo’s fuel efficiency and affordability make it a practical choice for people who live within urban areas. However, the article should have discussed the driving experience more thoroughly.
One of the most comprehensive comparisons. Both of these cars are fully described including their pros and cons. The author needs to be complimented for the in-depth research.
Great detailed article but the writer has missed out on how maintenance costs will affect the buyer. This is a huge part in making a decision on which car to buy.
The detailed comparison makes the decision process a lot easier to make. The features of both cars are very clearly explained.
Good simple comparison with a lot of important details
This is very helpful. The article has given a detailed comparison. It’s good to know that Toyota Wigo also offers a generous warranty period of 3 years. Great job!
I would not rely on this article – the details have some factual inaccuracies, specifically about the Mitsubishi Mirage. I prefer to look at the company’s official website for more accurate information.
The opinions expressed here are based on experiences, giving a more insightful view rather than generic information.
The comparison is a great read, but it doesn’t show the real flaws in the cars like the advantages are shown. Nevertheless, the comparison is very good
Authors seem to be biased towards Toyota Wigo. They should have remained neutral towards both vehicles.
I disagree with your view. The author has presented a balanced comparison between the two cars. There is no bias observed.
There is a good focus on the differences. It would be better if it highlighted which situations either of the cars would suit better.
The writer is very knowledgeable about the features of each car.
This comparison brings out the real qualities of the cars, very simplistically put but lacks the history of the companies.
The characteristics of both cars are well balanced and reflected in the comparison. The history of the companies involved would make a great addition to the comparison.